Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 10/29/2008 9:15 am

Conservatives to Hold Secret Post-Election Pow-Wow to Discuss Palin Prospects (Video)

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Sarah Palin’s a rock star.

Not the kind who can jam on a guitar or bang a mean drum, but the kind who has energized the Republican base since she was named John McCain’s running mate. Just watching the morning news shows this morning, we here at wowOwow have heard the Alaska governor called a “rock star” more than once.

She may have had some stumbles – what with saying her foreign policy credentials are good because she can see Russia from her house, and floundering in some national television interviews – but many conservatives agree that whether McCain wins or not, Palin has a bright future in the party. Heck – she could even be the presidential nominee in 2012.

Whether the McCain-Palin ticket wins or loses against Barack Obama and Joe Biden on November 4, a group of prominent conservatives are planning to meet the next day to discuss the way forward.

And Palin is going to be high on the agenda.

The New York Times reports that Palin’s prospects, in or out of government, are the subject of intensive conversations among conservative leaders, including the group that will meet next Wednesday in rural Virginia to weigh social, foreign policy and economic issues, as well as the political landscape and the next presidential election.

If McCain wins, the discussion will feature much talk of, "How do we work with this administration?" one meeting attendee told Politico.

In a McCain White House, Palin would be seen as the conservatives’ conduit to power. “She would be the conservative in the White House,” is how the source put it.

But if McCain loses, next week’s conversation will include who to groom as the next generation of conservative leaders – and Palin will be at or near the top.

Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center, called it a “top order of business” to determine Palin’s future role. “Conservatives have been looking for leadership, and she has proven that she can electrify the grass roots like few people have in the last 20 years,” Bozell told the Times. “No matter what she decides to do, there will be a small mother lode of financial support behind her.”

New AP polls out today show Barack Obama ahead of McCain in six swing states, and running neck-and-neck with his Republican opponent in two others.

MSNBC co-host Mika Brzezinski – herself no big fan of Palin – said “she is amazing, on many levels.” Not least of which that she is a mother of five, a governor and not long ago was just a mayor of a tiny town of 9,000. 

 

36 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Ky McQueen
Did anyone see her speech this morning???? It suprise me that she was talking about HER plan instead of the “McCain plan”…wow. McCain must be kicking himself in the a—. She isn’t pushing the ticket anymore, she is talking about herself…I thought HE was running for President. Good Grief!
By Ky McQueen on 10/29/2008 9:38 am
gulliver fourmyle
ok, i’ve been published-for-pay, founded and lost (poets are not MBA’s, nor most ‘bootstrap’ entrepreneurs) too many ‘wins’ to be termed ‘nutz’—-but i was raised in what several Very-Good Cognitive Therapist deem not simply a ‘dysfunctional’ family—-but ‘Sadistic’—-and given subsequent deals, 9 children, factories ‘Blown-Up’ Kid sister murdered by old boyfriend, as she refused to go w/him, and compete vs. my incs.——‘Borderline Personality-Mom, Pop, Uncles, etc.’ the upshot is i married one, (I wanta a gal just like the gal…)—-a ‘borderline’—-predictable—-for 25 years i had more wool pulled over my eyes than China has eyes—-yeah, i Was ‘co-dependent’—-why? i always knew it was easy to make $$$, and i was No money-manager—-so i go with an NYC full-math prof’s ‘bright’ daughter—-turns out she’s a total ‘Wastral’—-right under my nose—-so, now? do i know ‘Borderline’s’ yep, but too late for me, not you—-Palin is a classic example—-so do your ‘homework’—-check-out the classic signs—-she’s cursed with every single one—-they ‘gravitate’ to inc. boardrooms, politics—-crushing anyone on their ‘very-destructive’ path. considered the most ‘incurable’ of mental disorders, also the most dangerous—-more than even paranoid schizophrenics—-in the words of my last ‘talk-doc’ ‘They Kill. Look Out!’ and Palin relishes in killing—-hunting—-ordering the massacre of native wild-life—-she’s your problem now—-Crush her—-take no prisoner—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 11/04/2008 10:13 pm
Belinda Joy
The Republican Party has an enormous job ahead of itself. They have to rebuild their credibility and level of respect among Americans. The McCain candidacy was atrocious. I agree with Colin Powell, I don’t even recognize the Republican Party any longer. It has morphed into something that is disjointed, odd and off kilter. I understand 100% what conservatives believe and that was at one time tied to Republicans. In my mind it did not mean racist, it did not mean divisive in terms of splitting the country between “Real Americans” and “Anti Americans.” Conservatives, from my vantage point, didn’t feel they had to stoop to label a fellow American as a Marxist or Communist as a point of comparison to their beliefs. As I said, I don’t recognize the Republican Party. Conservative and Republican are no longer synonymous. I think they should concentrate on cleaning up the enormous amount of damage made over the last few months that have severely tarnished their brand name BEFORE they even start thinking of grooming their next “Party Star.”
By Belinda Joy on 10/29/2008 9:46 am
Joan Brown
Well that’s one way to keep Palin at bay, have McCain babysit her so she don’t mess up anymore. I believe that McCain thinks his ideas are right but Obama’s are much better and will help the average Joe and not the rich. Suck it up rich people, you have been having tax breaks for years and it hasn’t trickled down yet. Give the middle class a break for once. I’m sure that some will trickle up if you give it a chance.
By Joan Brown on 10/29/2008 9:47 am
John G
RICH is in the eyes of the beholder, not the holder. If you have a net worth of $20,000, that’s RICH to someone who’s net worth is $5.00. For anyone to assume that 10% of $1,000,000.00 is any less dear (or more importantly, is up for grabs!) to the holder than 10% of $1,000.00 is truly living up the the joke definition of ASSUME = assuming makes an ass out of you and me! Stop this ridiculous crap notion of sharing the wealth… it’s not realistic. If I have more than you, good for me. If you have more than me, good for you. Let’s look at it this way: Currently, Warren Buffett is worth more than Bill Gates. I doubt that Bill is sitting in his den thinking Warren should hand him a dime.
By John G on 10/29/2008 10:45 am
sibelle daubigne
John, “Radix lecti”!
By sibelle daubigne on 10/30/2008 10:24 am
John G
Dictum sapienti sat est… Radix omnium malorum est cupiditas!
By John G on 10/30/2008 10:52 am
gulliver fourmyle
va znatete po ruuski? vous parle le francais—-speak English—-snobs—-and take the Standford-Binet ‘off-scale’—-personally wish i had learned Spanish—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 11/04/2008 10:52 pm
gulliver fourmyle
i’m tired of this simple example—-‘give you the wealth of this planet—-place you Alone—-no other humans—-what then the value of Any amount of $$$?’ $$$ are simply a Social instrument—-and as such, the property of Any society—-not simply the ‘fat-cats’—-but All—-ya do not see that?????—-simple reasoning?
By gulliver fourmyle on 11/04/2008 10:42 pm
Ms. Dee
I don’t understand this. It appears to me that Palin has caused a big split in the “conservative base”. But I guess, if evangelicals have enough money to keep her afloat, we could see a legitimate third party emerge in time for 2012. But if the republicans are too short-sighted to see how John McCain’s VP pick lost them the election in 2008, who’s can fathom what they’re really trying to accomplish.
By Ms. Dee on 10/29/2008 9:47 am
Diana T
Dee, I think that Sarah Palin was the straw that broke the camel’s back. If you go back a few years, this evangelical split has been going on for quite a while in the party, and also the Atwater/Rove style of campaigning has reached the point where it’s not as effective as it once was. Now that we have Real Issues such as Economics, Environment and Peace, people are seeing the division much more clearly in the republican party. The Republican party is at a crossroads, and they are going to have to repair it from the inside out, and finally decide what planks to keep in their platform and what to discard.
By Diana T on 10/29/2008 11:46 am
Frannie Em
Diana I think you make a good point. They have to redefine and get back to the business of true conservation of the peoples resources. If they cannot do that, the independents may become the new party.
By Frannie Em on 10/29/2008 12:36 pm
Diana T
Frannie, Within the past 2 weeks, I have read a very interesting article with good historical references about how one group of people(the evangelicals) commandeered the whole republican party, why it was the republicans and not the democrats, and what is happening now. I hope I can remember where in the heck I saw it, and when I do, I’ll post it to you.
By Diana T on 10/29/2008 1:29 pm
Frannie Em
Diana I know that after Pres Bush I won the White House, they reviewed demographics and realized that he didn’t win it from the Latino or Black vote, or the female vote necessarily, but the Christians pushed the ticker in his direction. So after that they became a political tool for the repubs. Wouldn’t that also be true for other demographic voters and the democrats?
By Frannie Em on 10/29/2008 3:21 pm
Diana T
I remember Tom Delay and his gerrymandering of Texas, so that they could skew the precincts towards the republicans, Frannie. Gosh, I hope I can remember where in the heck I saw this article I keep rattling on about.
By Diana T on 10/29/2008 4:59 pm