Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 12/12/2008 9:35 am

Corruption, Crooks and Cars: What a Week! by Liz Peek

By Liz Peek

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 12/8) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics

wOw readers: Please let me know which companies you think might benefit from the recession; video game sales are up – anything else that you’re spending more money on than usual?

First Blagojevich, Illinois’s foul-mouthed governor accused of trying to sell Obama’s Senate seat. Now Bernie Madoff – a wildly successful trader who helped build NASDAQ – and who has just admitted to scamming friends and clients out of billions. Boy, no wonder this country is ready for a change!

Just as the Clinton crowd spitefully plucked the Ws out of the White House computer terminals, someone seems to have made off with the notions of honor and integrity. These scandals could not have come at a worse time. The country is being asked to have faith – faith that Henry Paulson knows what he is doing, faith that bankers will use taxpayer money responsibly, faith that the Big 3 automakers have responsible plans for paying back the loans they seek.

Americans are skeptical. They’ve seen Paulson jump from program to program, with little to show for the hundreds of billions he has handed out. They’ve seen the auto execs look like idiots as they drive to DC in hybrid cars (which, according to Mapquest, takes eight hours and 52 minutes – not a very intelligent use of their time). They’ve seen Congress bloviate and heckle everyone from Fed Chair Ben Bernanke to GM boss Rick Wagoner to billionaire hedge-fund manager George Soros (though I note that our legislators acquire a gloss of respect in direct proportion to the size of the pocketbook). It’s embarrassing, and worrisome.

No wonder polls show that taxpayers do not favor bailing out Detroit. They do not trust the petitioners, and they do not trust the legislators to honestly tackle the problems facing the automakers. They are right.

The only way that GM, Ford and Chrysler can possibly return to profitability is if they abolish their existing labor contracts – something that will probably happen only if the companies go through bankruptcy. The companies are paying more than $70 an hour for labor, while Toyota and other foreign companies in the U.S. pay only about $40. The more that Congress becomes involved in the salvage operation, the less likely that the labor problem will be addressed. Last year 98% of UAW campaign contributions went to Democrats; 96% of overall labor monies went to Democrats. The Dems are not about to bite the hand that has so richly fed them.

That is the issue. The stock market has been sawing back and forth as the prospects of a Big 3 bailout wax and wane, but the market, too, doesn’t know what it wants. No one can tell what would happen if GM went under. Rick Wagoner has said that no one will buy a car from a bankrupt company. He may be right; I don’t know. I do know that these companies cannot go back to business as usual.

This past week, traders were not only watching the car company travails. They were also watching yet another “once in a lifetime” story unfold. On Tuesday the Treasury issued three-month t-bills that temporarily had a negative yield. That means that investors were actually willing to lose money buying t-bills. If this concept makes you woozy, you’re not alone. Apparently such a circumstance arose back in the 1930s – but I never read about it. What gives?

39 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Liz Peek
Hi Lily- I agree with your view of Madoff. There are probably others like him - but the sheer scale of his deceit is almost unthinkable. I’ll be writing this weekend about how WOW readers can make sure that the people they hand over their money to are genuine. It’s not easy - a lot of very impressive people were conned by this guy. I am so thankful I never met him! Thanks for weighing in- Liz
By Liz Peek on 12/13/2008 9:50 am
Diana T
When this crisis came to light a few months ago, my sister and brother-in-law happened to be visiting me. He is an international economist and a former World Bank Director. We agreed that if the truth were known, our troubles are more towards $2 Trillion than the $700 mil. Congress allotted. I agree with Lily when she says that this is just the tip of the iceberg. I also believe that our Congress has become so entrenched with the special interest groups, the conflict of interest groups and out dated ideology, that they are taking us down and we are letting them. For far too long, Americans have been lulled into the mentality that it doesn’t matter if they participate in government or not. Typically, both houses of Congress will tell you that their phone calls and emails are running overwhelmingly against these bailouts and rescues. Why do you think that is? Could it be because most people are not thinking of the long term consequences of their decisions? The laws of unintended consequences, and we are being drawn into this scenario right now. This attitude started years ago, and we are quickly running out of time to correct it.
By Diana T on 12/12/2008 10:57 am
Agyness O
I agree with both Lily and Diana and think this is the”tip of the iceberg” and we are seeing the results of no transparency in the markets and how to deal with such and the amounts needed to do so. Our troubles are much greater if the truth be known and logically more in the trillions than billions and we may have already run out of time. This is greed and corruption beyond the imagination of anything in our history, not to mention just our lifetimes!. While we were busily playing our fiddles, the clowns seems to have taken us over the edge.
By Agyness O on 12/12/2008 1:29 pm
Liz Peek
Hi Diana- you are so right! I rant on about women not taking an interest in or responsiblity for finance- but there are also so many people who do not concern themselves with politics. I think that one of the silver linings about the current mess is that everyone is waking up and taking notice. Cab drivers, waiters, doormen - everyone has an opinion - and some make a lot of sense. Interesting that you note the $2 trillion figure - that’s the number hedge fund wonderboy John Paulson used many months ago when describing his very correct view of the mortgage disaster. So far, the banks have written off about $1.5 trillion, I think - so at least we’ve passed the half-way mark. The problem that kept Japan in a sinkhole for so long was that the banks wouldn’t acknowledge their losses - and so could never start to lend again. Presumably, we’ve dodged that bullet - but it’s like we’re facing a machine gun this time around! Best - Liz
By Liz Peek on 12/13/2008 9:56 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Liz: Two little items in your article peeked my interest or rather perked up my ears: You mention the Big Three driving all those miles for the congressional hearings and what a waste of time, but they were chastised in the beginning for flying in on their private jets. How would you propose they come and go? Brooms, maybe? The second item was the salary for the American auto workers you cited at $70 per hr. From what I understand that includes pension and health care. The foreign companies which are not union pay less an hour and I don’t know what their pension and health care happen to be. Do you? One of the big contenders in all this has to do with unions , isn’t that so?
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 12/12/2008 12:58 pm
mary lou s
phyllis, it’s piqued your interest. secondly, some number like $18 per hour goes to retiree pensions and health care. it’s different for each company. universal health care and government financed pensions like those in competitor countries further lower competitor’s costs. the uaw has been giving concessions since the contract of 2005, and new hires will be working for wages of $14 per hour. the republican senators demanded that the uaw negotiate with them even though the employers are ford, general motors and chrysler. it is ridiculous to bow and scrape to megabankers and then humiliate the automakers. the senators held union busting as more important than rescuing the economy of our country. liz, the story about the w’s missing from typewriters was made up and later proved not true. aside from that, thanks for raising the topic.
By mary lou s on 12/13/2008 12:47 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Thanks for the info. And I know it’s “piqued”, I was just having a little fun with Liz Peek’s name, but thank you anyway.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 12/13/2008 8:22 am
Liz Peek
HI Phyllis - you raise two good points. First, I think the auto guys should fly on a regular plane - isn’t that what you would do? Though my family is from the midwest and I grew up thinking that the only way to get anywhere was by car, I now get completely antsy if I have to drive more than 3 hours - too much time in New York! So- driving from Detroit to DC just seemed silly to me. Second - you are right - the $70+ per hour rate is “all in” - and does include benefits. Toyota, BMW et al are profitable with a wage rate that does not include pensions etc- becasue in many other countries more of that burden is borne by the government. The problem is - the Big Three have to compete on the same terms or they will never turn a profit. Best - Liz
By Liz Peek on 12/13/2008 10:01 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Thanks, Liz, for responding. Yes, regular planes, much better than brooms at any rate. I have just received some awful news. A close friend of mine has just informed me that she and her husband had their retirement portfolio with Bernie Madoff and have lost 3 million. Why they had all that with him is something I didn’t have the heart to ask. Luckily, their daughter took out her inheritance part of it last spring and has invested it elsewhere, not in the U.S. Tough times in rough waters!
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 12/13/2008 10:14 am
Marilyn Rick
Wait until NY’s hidden political scandals come out. Illinois’ current scandal will pale in comparison. NY’s scandals are the result of a victim (and her sister) not disappearing haplessly and quietly into the night.
By Marilyn Rick on 12/12/2008 1:43 pm
Barbara Taylor
I don’t understand, Americans were calling, emailing, any way we could to our representatives in Washington when the first bail out was up for a vote. Of course, as the public we were ignored, the politicians know better. Yea, right. Why aren’t we all up in arms now? We are just sitting watching while company execs and politicians do whatever they want, with little say from us.
By Barbara Taylor on 12/12/2008 2:59 pm
Lee Harrison
I, for one, have been up in arms for weeks about this. I sent letters to the editors of the Washington Post, USA Today and the Chicago papers but they were not published. I actually responded to specific stories instead of just sending rants, hoping that would help. It seem like a waste of time contacting our congresspersons, since they are politicians. Hey…maybe this calls for some 60s-style civil disobedience;-) But who has time to sit-in someplace…and where, exactly would we sit in? Face it…we’re doomed.
By Lee Harrison on 12/13/2008 6:04 pm
Barbara Taylor
Hi Liz, This is off topic and without much details, maybe you can provide some kind of answer. Good idea or not a good idea? Over the years I’ve rolled over my 401K’s to a IRA retirement. I have 10 years before retirement, trying to be optimistic that I can retire. A financial planner says I should move my money to an “annuity”. The money was in a 500 index and mid-cap fund, until the drop in the market. Recently moved to a Prime Money Market Fund. I also have stocks which I did not sell, but they are good stocks like IBM, Ebay and purchased JNJ when the market dropped. Should I say no to annuities?
By Barbara Taylor on 12/12/2008 3:10 pm
Marilyn Rick
Annuities are not generally considered a good deal. I don’t know your particular financial situation but I’ll bet your financial planner’s own financial picture is not much better, probably suffering even. Don’t help your financial planner by harming yourself. I am sure Suze Orman would tell you to ask him/her how much commission he/she is going to get—get dollar amounts. There are different kinds of annuities so be careful. Why don’t you go to the library and check out some of her books? She gives advice in lay person’s terms. You might want to check out the Suze Orman website.
By Marilyn Rick on 12/12/2008 5:56 pm
Barbara Taylor
Marilyn, Thanks for the advise. My gut feeling is to not listen to him, he is a little to pushy.
By Barbara Taylor on 12/12/2008 9:18 pm