Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Cynthia McFadden | 08/22/2008 2:00 pm

Cynthia McFadden: Rick Warren's 'Army of Compassion' Goes Beyond Presidential Politics

Cynthia McFadden
A couple of weeks ago I posted a story about my trip to Rwanda with Pastor Rick Warren and his wife Kay. My story was supposed to air on "Nightline," but got bumped. The story finally aired this week. Rick Warren, of course, has been very much in the news after hosting both presidential candidates at Saddleback Church in California, a church he and Kay started from scratch almost 30 years ago. Membership now tops 20,000. I was there for the forum and also filed a piece for "Nightline" about that. I came away deeply impressed with the way Rick Warren conducted the sessions. He asked interested and important questions, was respectful to both candidates and brought out important and fresh information about each of the candidates world views. But Rick Warren’s interests extend far beyond presidential politics. He and Kay are working hard to launch an "army of compassion" around the world to help deal with some of the most troubling and enduring of problems: poverty, health care and education. Invited to Rwanda by that country’s President Paul Kagame in the wake of his bestselling book, The Purpose Driven® Life (now topping 30 million copies in sales making it the bestselling hard-covered adult book of all time — excepting the Bible), President Kagame asked Warren to come and help him turn Rwanda into a "purpose-driven nation." Warren and his wife and their colleagues have launched their program — dubbed the PEACE plan — in Rwanda and plan to spread it to other countries around the world. Sixty-seven other countries have already signed up.

Needless to say, Warren made a fortune from the sale of his book. By the way, sales of the book, which was published in 2002, skyrocketed after the forum on Saturday. Well, the Warrens decided to live on ten percent of the money and give 90 percent of it back to the church. A reverse tithe. In Rwanda they have pledged a quarter of a million dollars of their personal funds to help build a new hospital in the country’s desperately poor Western province. The current hospital has no running water. During last Sunday’s church service he said the reason the book became a bestseller was "God knew he could trust me with the money."

Warren is not without critics, some of whom say he has taken Christian doctrine and turned it into a self-help easy-access plan. Such complaints have done nothing it seems to dull his self-confidence or his sense of humor. I hope you’ll watch the story at the link below and let me know your thoughts.

Click here to read the story on "Nightline."

Read more about: News, Nightline, Rick Warren

37 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
I don’t know if I have ever agreed with conservative syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker until she said the following in the Chicago Tribune: “CANDIDATESCHURCH CHAT ERODES U.S. PRINCIPLES Let’s be honest: Forum with Warren was religious test for McCain, Obama At the risk of heresy, let it be said that setting up the two presidential candidates for religious interrogation by an evangelical minister—no matter how beloved—is supremely wrong. It is also un-American.” Here is the link to that article: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped0820parkeraug20,0,…
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 1:32 pm
Frannie Em
De Burca Trust me no-one cares if you are heretical. They agreed to the interview, so it wasn’t interrogation. Did you see the entire two hours? It definitely came from a religious and service viewpoint, but it also showed Obama in a church other than Rev Wright’s. Showed he was open minded. Why is it un-American. I thought in America we had freedom of speech, no matter who you were, even if you believe in God. It seemed to me an easy forum to begin with before the debates. What’s wrong now?
By Frannie Em on 08/22/2008 1:53 pm
DeBúrca obj
There is not supposed to be a religious litmus test for the presidency in the US. I’m not even saying I think that it was bad for Obama to do the interview at Saddleback church politically, I just agree with Parker on this, it’s not a road we want to go down.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 3:23 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
There is not supposed to, but it has been over a hundred years since an atheist could run for President and be taken seriously. Unfortunately more people revere the flag than the Constitution. Even President Bush is reputed to have said, “The Constitution is just a piece of paper.” But I agree with you, there should NOT be a religious test for President. Unfortunately, there is a substantial segment of the population, maybe a third or more, who thinks otherwise.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 08/22/2008 5:27 pm
DeBúrca obj
Well, it’s up to the rest of us to not allow that 3rd to bully us into disregarding the Constitution and chipping away at the separation of church and state which is so important to our liberty in this country.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 5:43 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
I agree, but when we cannot get the major candidates to refuse a debate event sponsored by a religious leader with lots of religious questions, it is an uphill battle.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 08/22/2008 5:59 pm
DeBúrca obj
We can speak out against that type of forum and make it easier for the candidates to bow out.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 6:01 pm
Frannie Em
De Burca I would worry more about lobbyist/special interests than that civil forum held by a pastor. That was out in the open, replayed in it’s entirety, and didn’t hide anything. The special interests have been holding private meetings with our government representatives, and chipping away at the rights of the average citizen for a long long time, and their God is profit.
By Frannie Em on 08/22/2008 7:29 pm
DeBúrca obj
I am equally concerned with both.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 7:47 pm
Frannie Em
Elizabeth B So you think there are 100,000,000 evangelicals? Are you sure? I don’t know how many there are. It would be interesting to know. I believe that number is too high, but if our population is around 300 million, then a third would be 100million.
By Frannie Em on 08/22/2008 7:31 pm
Frannie Em
Elizabeth, I thought that this might interest you. The numbers were much higher in 2000 then they were in 1992 when Pres Bush Senior ran against future Pres Clinton.http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/voting/004986.html
By Frannie Em on 08/22/2008 7:38 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Not evangelicals per se, but the number of voters who require a Presidential candidate to have a religious orientation is larger than I thought: http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=3012
By Elizabeth Bennett on 08/22/2008 8:36 pm
Frannie Em
Elizabeth, That was an interesting article. My question is, we have been a country that began on the premise of separation of church and state and our laws reflect that, but do you believe we can legislate people’s opinions? Wouldn’t you say that just reaches further into destroying civil freedoms? Sometimes I wonder if people prefer that their president has a religious background because they can identify with them better, or believe they may be more honest? I don’t know, just musing. But one thing I know for sure, you can’t legislate opinion, So, I would assume that the campaigns staffers are aware of the info that you linked, and therefore encourage their candidates to participate in the forum. So seems like it was a smart move. The game of politics. What can one say.
By Frannie Em on 08/23/2008 11:26 pm
Frannie Em
De Burca People are people with different criteria of how they evaluate who they want to vote for president. African American churches have, as long as I can remember, had political figures speaking at their churches. I am a firm believer is separation of church and state, but anyone can hold a civil forum and if the candidates agree to go, they go. Everyone is a special interest now.
By Frannie Em on 08/22/2008 7:24 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Thanks, De B for the Parker piece which I totally agree with. Whenever there’s a meshing of religious murmuring, however faint it may be, mixed in with politics, it gives me certain tingles in the backside.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 08/23/2008 10:07 am