Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 09/17/2008 9:45 am

Elizabeth Edwards Talks Health Care, Mum on Affair

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Elizabeth Edwards at the National Constitution Center in

Philadelphia, Sept. 16, 2008 © AP

Elizabeth Edwards came out of hiding Wednesday.

In her first public talk since her husband, two-time Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards publicly admitted having an affair, Edwards attended a talk in Philadelphia on health care. She never mentioned her marital ordeal. Edwards was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2004, which disappeared after treatment but returned in early 2007 in an insurable form.

Saying she’s discouraged that health care is falling on the nation’s list of priorities, Edwards also critiqued the plans of both leading presidential candidates, Sens. John McCain, R-AZ, and Barack Obama, D-IL.

The Philadelphia Enquirer reports that Edwards told the audience of 200 people at the National Constitution Center that the current health-care system is immoral and "fails everyone except the extremely wealthy." She said Wall Street’s financial crisis may demand national attention and money that would otherwise be invested in fixing the health-care system.

"I’m more discouraged than I was before," she said. "Shame on us if we don’t take the momentum — even with all the other things that are happening — and translate it into a policy."

AP reports that Edwards said she fought with Obama over his health-care policy, which mandates insurance for children but doesn’t require coverage for adults. She had few good things to say about McCain’s plan, arguing that it would simply lower costs by forcing limited policies. But the Enquirer said she stayed mostly neutral on politics.

She said McCain "wants to take away the tax incentive for employers to provide insurance." That would drastically increase the number of uninsured and dramatically drive up health-care costs, she said.

"The problem with political rhetoric," she said, according to the Enquirer, "is that everything sounds good."

Edwards said responsibility lies both with individuals, who need to take good preventive care, and insurance companies, which should be concerned with long-term health instead of short-term savings.

John and Elizabeth Edwards have been keeping to themselves after the former North Carolina senator admitted in early August to having an affair with a staffer, Rielle Hunter. Hunter had a child that John Edwards claims is not his, and has volunteered to take a paternity test, but Hunter has refused. There’s also controversy over a $14,000 payment Edwards made to Hunter.

John Edwards has canceled all of his public events until after the November 4 election.

37 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Elizabeth Bennett
http://www.pnhp.org/facts/singlepayer_faq.php http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/etc/synopsis…. Just about every country does it better than ours does. We still have people dying of curable diseases because they do not have health insurance. What a tax that is on the poor! As health premium costs rise, it becomes a tax on the middle class.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/18/2008 12:58 pm
Mary in California
Elizabeth, I have lived in a country that has “universal health care” and my experience is that everyone bought additional coverage so that they do not have to wait for treatment for a serious illness or if surgery is needed. I can also tell you about how the Canadian government would not allow a couple to adopt a orphan from another country because her medical costs to correct her deformity were estimated to be over $500k so an non-profit organization did the surgery in the USA. Yep - the USA to the rescue again. So, until we do something about illegal aliens taxing our system and tort reform, I do not see how nationalizing health care will do anything but lower the standard of my family’s level of care. I do not consider your linked sources to be credible - pnhp is an organization called physicans for a nationalized health program and well all know about PBS.
By Mary in California on 09/19/2008 1:10 pm
Deni G
You don’t consider Elizabeth’s source to be credible? Well so far, you have no credible sources.
By Deni G on 09/19/2008 7:16 pm
Rush L
I hate facts to Mary.
By Rush L on 09/18/2008 2:40 pm
Maggi D
It has been said over and over again - just the cost of all the uninsured that end up in the emergency rooms across the nation that cannot pay would help cover national coverage. The uninsured could go to the doctor when a symptom was first noticed and able to be handled at very little cost rather than waiting until it is life threatening and very costly. I think that even the ones like myself that are living on a very tight budget would willingly pay a small amount monthly to be able to see a doctor when needed. As I have posted before - I had a sinus infection that ended up costing over $3,000.00 in ER visits because I could not afford to go to the doctor when it started. It got so bad they thought I had had a stroke and ordered Cscan and MRI. It was ridiculous. A $150 doctor visit could have saved me many weeks of pain and suffering and thousands of dollars that the taxpayers had to absorb. It isn’t much different than saying food is so expensive that we just have to let some people starve. Not sure what the answer is - just know that something has to be done.
By Maggi D on 09/18/2008 2:55 am
Bonnie D-Z
It’s unfortunate that Elizabeth Edwards did not step up to the plate and endorse Hillary Clinton when Hillary needed it. We know that she supported Hillary’s health care plan. This election, I will vote my wallet. Nearing retirement, I choose to keep my money rather than give it up without my consent. Over the past 30 years, I’ve paid tens of thousands of dollars for local school taxes (I have no children), social programs (I never used), and more. I’ts my turn now. Personal donations to churches and/or other charities of my choice will happily continue.
By Bonnie D-Z on 09/19/2008 10:40 am
Susie Ruth
Not only do I admire Elizabeth for her concerns regarding health care in our country, but the way in which she’s handled her husband’s affair. She’s speaking out for an issue that affects all of us. And keeping quiet about an issue that only concerns her and her family. Nothing is accomplished in this world with discussions on blame or how we go to were we are today, but on finding solutions. Thank you Elizabeth for showing us what we can do inspite of personal battles and continuing the battle for a better health care system in our country.
By Susie Ruth on 09/19/2008 1:28 pm