Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Etceterist | 10/31/2008 12:00 am

Emily Post: Libertarian? Liberationist? Lesbian?

A new biography says everything you thought you knew about Emily Post is wrong
By Billy Norwich

The Etceterist sits down with Laura Claridge, author of Emily Post: Daughter of the Gilded Age, Mistress of American Manners. See Joni Evans’s welcome to Billy Norwich on our site by clicking here.

THE ETCETERIST: Everything I presumed I knew to be true about Emily Post was wrong. She wasn’t a prim, little old lady who dispatched rules about cocked baby fingers and teacups and elbows off the table.

LAURA CLARIDGE: Hardly.

ETC: In fact, when she was asked about elbows on the table, she basically said, “Who cares?” Her message, dispatched through the more than ten editions of her etiquette bible first published in 1922, which she revised regularly until 1955, was the golden rule: Treat others as you would wish them to treat you. This well-born Social Register debutante daughter from Baltimore helped Americans welcome rapid innovations — from electricity, the automobile, the telephone, the radio — and she was an outspoken populist who encouraged people to not isolate behind social conventions and rules, but open their doors literally and figuratively to new ideas and new people celebrating the great American ideal of diversity and “the melting pot.”

LC: She was extraordinarily modern.

ETC: Plus, she was an architect, she designed the apartment building at 39 East 79th Street for instance, and a literary woman, a protégé of Mark Twain, a brilliant businesswoman who created the template for careers like Martha Stewart’s and Oprah Winfrey’s. All of this was a revelation as well as her shocking, painful divorce in 1905 when her husband’s infidelities were made public after he refused to be blackmailed by a newspaper editor to keep them secret.

LC: Yes, Emily Post was democratic in the best sense of the word, striking down form in the name of substance any time she could. Appearing in court daily at her husband’s side as he sought to bring down his blackmailer, the publisher of the gossip sheet “Town Topics,” she handled herself with real dignity masking great sorrow. After her divorce she had to work — she was the mother of two young sons. She also wanted to work for her self-esteem, and she had written and published several novels and short stories, some of them very well reviewed. Then the idea came for her, in the early 1920s, age 50, to write an etiquette book, encouraged by Vanity Fair editor Frank Crowninshield. And the success of the book enabled her to have the incredibly busy professional life she chose over everything. In this regard, she was very emancipated for her age.

ETC: She never married again. Never even dated, it seemed. In fact, reading the book and your descriptions of the close relationship that developed over time with her secretary and companion Hilda Ogren I kept waiting for the big news: Emily Post was a lesbian? “What needs the gruff servant with a heart of gold … fulfilled through her relationship with her employer are unclear,” you write.

LC: (Laughs.) Every month as I progressed with the book, my husband would ask, “Well, is she?” I kept hoping — it would be such big news — and I kept going back to her grandson and asking, “Don’t you think, just maybe?” I expected him to be outraged but not at all. “You know,” he said, “we kind of wondered that too because of her relationship with Hilda but we don’t think that, after the divorce, there ever was another man, or a woman. Sex was just gone.”

ETC: Because of her entrepreneurial agility, combined with the invention of the radio and her syndicated newspaper columns, Emily Post and her golden rule of enlightened manners and kindness, really was an oracle. Writing in The Year of Magical Thinking, Joan Didion describes how, after her husband died, how much the enlightened, kindly chapter on funerals in the 1922 edition of Emily’s book on etiquette helped her. Do you think she was the Oprah of her day?

21 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Buh- Bye
I highly recommend Didion’s “Year of Magical Thinking” to any who have experienced recent loss. She captures the vastness of the moments.
By Buh- Bye on 10/31/2008 8:51 pm
Chris Broersma
Was she “A-sexual,” I wonder? It’s an interesting idea, that’s for sure!
By Chris Broersma on 11/01/2008 12:17 am
Garden Goddess
I think it is fair to opine that many women, as they grow older, become more asexual, outgrow old roles (wife, mother, community chest), experience hormonal shifts that are normal, and look for ways to self-actualize, become the potential with which we were born. For myself, I find this tremendously liberating. And if a few of my relationships with other women, with whom I have a much stronger identity in my later years than I did in earlier ones, are more deep, emotional, affectionate and even intimate (do not read sexual, though I have no objection to that - what others do sexually is simply none of my business, along with any number of other bodily functions, so long as it does not become a public or political cause) in a way that is often difficult to impossible with a male of any age, I think this bodes well for my vision of women everywhere uniting with one another, for bringing the female perspective to issues that males have dominated (and messed up) and for restoring a balance in every aspect of life in every corner of the globe. I suspect that the competition and emphasis we put on physical appearance are appropriate in a biological sense when we are of childbearing age. For myself, age and the gift of many conversations with many women in many parts of the US as well as in many stations in life have led me to have an admiration and respect for women that is unshakable and my whole focus in life is to be a facilitator of female empowerment and unity, leading by example of course. So, role models like Emily’s, Eleanor Roosevelt, Susan B. Anthony, Oprah and many, many others - many of whom we never have nor ever will learn - are encouraging and inspire me to be among their kind. We can’t all have a national stage, or even a terribly public life, but we can all give to each other the gift of appreciation for the womanliness we share, with all its power, potential and gifts. And, lest I be accused of denigrating the role of man, let’s just view this in the complementary paradigm that is everywhere evident in our physical world. Oppressed women are not able to be a full complement, not to mention the invaluable and irretrievable loss that represents. I like to believe that enlightened men would want nothing less in the females of this world.
By Garden Goddess on 11/01/2008 11:38 am
Maurine H
Garden Goddess - Beautifully, insightfully put. We women are ever evolving and in our middle and older years, I think we see beyond roles and stereotypes because we are finally able to look inward. The resultant discoveries allow us to embrace the whole world community and not just its various components.
By Maurine H on 11/01/2008 9:57 pm
Ms. Dee
I am so glad to hear about Ms. Claridge’s effort. Thank you, Mr. Etceterist.
By Ms. Dee on 11/02/2008 10:52 am
sibelle daubigne
By sibelle daubigne on 11/02/2008 6:37 pm