Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Etceterist | 10/22/2008 2:30 pm

The Etceterist: Go For It, Sarah Palin!

Revelations that the Republican National Committee has spent some $150,000 on dressing up the governor of Alaska for the campaign trail could be a wonderful thing for the world of fashion, specifically American fashion, especially at a time when consumer confidence is waning.

Compared to the French (no one in Paris is giving Carla Bruni a hard time for dressing the role of First Lady in the local couture) or even the British, Americans maintain a very ambiguous relationship to fashion. We want it, we revere it on reality shows, we insist our celebrities dress well — hence the success we are reminded of this week in the obituaries of Richard Blackwell and his annual Worst-Dressed List — but if you are found out to actually spend money on fashion, style or grooming, such as John Edwards’s pricey haircuts or Cindy McCain’s earrings or way back to Jackie Kennedy’s Cassini frocks, we attack the person for being wasteful and superficial. Basically, you are vilified.

Now how the hell are retailers expected to move the merch with this attitude? This is a very tired point of view, hypocritical to its roots in a capitalistic system where, at least in Manhattan, the fashion business is the No. 2 revenue producer for the city, second only to finance. (Probably, now No. 1 given the failures of finance.)

So, go Sarah, go! Instead of shrinking, lying, deflecting, come out of the closet and, yes, yes, yes, declare it: "I am a fashionista in a recessionista world! I am a proud wearer of good clothing! I wake up thinking of shoes. I get my hair done, my nails, my makeup … I read Vogue! I was in Vogue

"Clothes make the man and fashion the woman. And I do this for you, America! Anymore than I would wave a threadbare flag on the campaign trail would I shake it in a muumuu from Mervyn’s."

And better dress departments from sea to shining sea will thank you, Sarah Palin, for coming, so to speak, out of the closet.

 

More from wowOwow’s The Etceterist

The Down Index: How the Other Half Lives (Now)

Who Is Dressing Sarah Palin? wowOwow’s Etceterist Hears … 

10 Ways to Make a Bad Wall Street Guy Look Good

 

99 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Maurine H
If we take a look at the Republican and Democratic campaigns as small economies in themselves, we get an idea of how they deal with budgets. With his campaign funding rapidly diminishing, McCain chooses to place $150,000 of the public’s money on the back of Sarah Palin to create a more “fashionista-like” appearing running mate. Obama’s campaign, on the other hand, with money still pouring in, chooses to purchase a half hour of television network time so that the candidate can discuss his plans and policies with the voters. The priority differences seem obvious as does the money management. I used to send Obama $50 every time Palin or McCain lied or said something absolutely stupid. But that got too expensive. So now I continue to contribute my $50 to Obama whenever I can. Apparently I’m not alone. Millions of us like the way the Obama campaign is managing our contributions. OBAMA/BIDEN 08
By Maurine H on 10/22/2008 2:42 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
I concur, Maurine. And may I add I would like to put this inane article back in the closet where it belongs with the high priced clothes that most people nowadays can only dream about if dream they do.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 10/22/2008 4:34 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
I just wonder how far it goes. If elected, would McCain promise to have Versace design new uniforms for the military—and definitely for the Supreme Court—very drab group they are. I mean, why stop with the Vice Presidential candidate? And if she donates all of her clothes to charity at the end of the race, what on earth is she going to wear to Cabinet meetings? Ready to wear from Coldwater Creek? Makes me wonder if she will donate her hair to locks of love as well. Oh yes, as much as we can afford, donate to Obama, but kick a little cash toward the Senatorial campaigns; they could really use it. Without sixty Senators ready to stop filibusters, Obama is just going to be trapped by the mess left by Bush.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 10/22/2008 5:47 pm
Maurine H
I hear you, Elizabeth! Yesterday I donated another $50 to Michelle Bachman’s opponent, Elwyn Tinklenberg, and I’m not even from Minnesota! After hearing Rep. Bachman’s McCarthyesque charge of anti-Americanism amongst members of Congress and, in particular, Senator Obama, I jumped on my computer and made a donation to Mr. Tinklenberg. I hope he wins and Ms. Bachman gets the message that she needs to give some thought to her words. Seems I’m not alone in my support of her opponent. I read today that he’s raised over a millon dollars in the last few days, small donations from people like me who don’t want the Bachman’s of the world representing us. Go Tinklenberg!
By Maurine H on 10/22/2008 8:11 pm
Rita T
Maurine, could you believe those words came out of Rep. McCarthey … I mean Bachmann’s mouth? Oh, and you will be happy to know that she blamed Chris Matthews today for setting her up. Because he could read her mind and knew she was going to spout out that kind of crap?
By Rita T on 10/22/2008 10:09 pm
Amelie Poulain
Is there a link to this conversation with Bachmann? I missed it. She really scares me.
By Amelie Poulain on 10/29/2008 2:32 pm
Steve R
Elizabeth (one of my favorite names) Supreme Court: I am sure they will be shopping at The Vatican for new robes. I understand that Great Brittan is getting rid of the traditional wigs as a cost-saving measure. We did that long, long ago. “Ready to wear from Coldwater Creek?”: maybe “Lands End”. If she runs the VP office as much like Cheney as she has indicated, she will be wearing alot of camouflage.
By Steve R on 10/23/2008 2:38 pm
Giving Heart
And what do you do, Maurine, for the multiple lies daily from Obama and his cohorts?
By Giving Heart on 10/23/2008 8:58 am
Maurine H
Well, Giving Heart, I consider the source. Most of those “multiple lies” come directly from the McCain campaign. Barack Obama may not be your candidate, but he is not a liar.
By Maurine H on 10/23/2008 10:37 am
f p
And what do you do about the multiple lies coming from McCain and his cohorts?
By f p on 10/23/2008 12:07 pm
Amelie Poulain
OK I am really sorry I looked at that. My eyes are welling up with tears. What the hell is wrong with some people? Dear God help us all.
By Amelie Poulain on 10/29/2008 2:38 pm
elaine s
The article makes a valid point, except that the American voter should care that Palin’s clothes were paid for by the RNC. Barack and Michelle, and Biden pay for their own. Cindy pays for Old Cranky’s, I assume. All candidates should wear American designer labels.
By elaine s on 10/22/2008 2:43 pm
Lucinda Herbert
This is the dumbest discussion. Hillary had a stylist (how about those pants suits?), Edwards had a $400.00 haircut. If they hadn’t spruced Palin up, you all would have said she looked like white trash. And, when it come to wasting money, Hillary may have bought her own clothes (difficult to know who picked up the tab), but she has asked other people to make her whole despite the fact that she wasted millions of dollars on a mismanaged campaign. I think we can find more important topics to discuss than who paid for a female candidate’s wardrobe.
By Lucinda Herbert on 10/22/2008 10:49 pm
Andromeda Jakes
I guess the truth hurts. We are discussing the here and now.
By Andromeda Jakes on 10/23/2008 7:26 am