Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Etceterist | 10/22/2008 2:30 pm

The Etceterist: Go For It, Sarah Palin!

Revelations that the Republican National Committee has spent some $150,000 on dressing up the governor of Alaska for the campaign trail could be a wonderful thing for the world of fashion, specifically American fashion, especially at a time when consumer confidence is waning.

Compared to the French (no one in Paris is giving Carla Bruni a hard time for dressing the role of First Lady in the local couture) or even the British, Americans maintain a very ambiguous relationship to fashion. We want it, we revere it on reality shows, we insist our celebrities dress well — hence the success we are reminded of this week in the obituaries of Richard Blackwell and his annual Worst-Dressed List — but if you are found out to actually spend money on fashion, style or grooming, such as John Edwards’s pricey haircuts or Cindy McCain’s earrings or way back to Jackie Kennedy’s Cassini frocks, we attack the person for being wasteful and superficial. Basically, you are vilified.

Now how the hell are retailers expected to move the merch with this attitude? This is a very tired point of view, hypocritical to its roots in a capitalistic system where, at least in Manhattan, the fashion business is the No. 2 revenue producer for the city, second only to finance. (Probably, now No. 1 given the failures of finance.)

So, go Sarah, go! Instead of shrinking, lying, deflecting, come out of the closet and, yes, yes, yes, declare it: "I am a fashionista in a recessionista world! I am a proud wearer of good clothing! I wake up thinking of shoes. I get my hair done, my nails, my makeup … I read Vogue! I was in Vogue

"Clothes make the man and fashion the woman. And I do this for you, America! Anymore than I would wave a threadbare flag on the campaign trail would I shake it in a muumuu from Mervyn’s."

And better dress departments from sea to shining sea will thank you, Sarah Palin, for coming, so to speak, out of the closet.

 

More from wowOwow’s The Etceterist

The Down Index: How the Other Half Lives (Now)

Who Is Dressing Sarah Palin? wowOwow’s Etceterist Hears … 

10 Ways to Make a Bad Wall Street Guy Look Good

 

99 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

f p
The 400 came out of his pocket—the 150K came out of public donations to the RNC who are pissed off about it. Hillary is a dead issue.
By f p on 10/23/2008 10:09 am
Irish Eyes NY
fp: It doesn’t bother me at all what the RNC spent on Sarah. What bothers me is all the millions of dollars that are being donated to BO. Where is all that money coming from, will we ever find out? Your little $50 donations just don’t cut it, ladies.
By Irish Eyes NY on 10/28/2008 6:10 pm
Amelie Poulain
I still don’t know why they couldn’t find any designers to give her FREE clothes. Most of the famous folks I know get boxes of free stuff from designers around the world that want to see their stuff in the rag magazines without paying the huge advertising costs. Am I the only one that finds it odd that she had to pay AT ALL?
By Amelie Poulain on 10/29/2008 1:18 pm
Irish Eyes NY
Amelie: I agree. Those Hollywood types make demands for free stuff and they get it, and those bums can surely afford to buy whatever they need. How ‘bout those gift bags they get from “In Style” & “Vanity Fair”. They finally now have to claim them on their income taxes as earned income. Can you believe those bags contained items like expensive designer watches, and other goodies valued at more than $4000.00?
By Irish Eyes NY on 10/29/2008 1:59 pm
Amelie Poulain
That’s what I am saying. The ones I know are just nice, and don’t even demand it. Wouldn’t it be cool to have Gaultier just send a huge box to your door in your size and say, “Take what you want and send back the rest!”
By Amelie Poulain on 10/29/2008 2:40 pm
DeBúrca obj
It’s about the hypocrisy of the amount of money dressing and putting make-up on the shill who is going around calling Obama “elitist” and talking about “real Americans”.
By DeBúrca obj on 10/23/2008 11:17 am
f p
Yup De, how many “real” Americans out there buy 150K in clothes in less than a month? Especially in the current econ crisis the world is in? No many I’ll bet.
By f p on 10/23/2008 12:13 pm
DeBúrca obj
Well now Frank, be fair… it wasn’t ALL spent on clothing. A pretty good chunk was spent on make-up. Lipstick for pitbulls much be expensive!
By DeBúrca obj on 10/23/2008 12:31 pm
f p
7-13K on makeup and hair—that’s a lotta pitbull lip gloss
By f p on 10/23/2008 12:49 pm
Irish Eyes NY
Ahhhhh, Frank: They are keeping the economy going,don’t ya think?
By Irish Eyes NY on 10/29/2008 4:28 pm
Rita T
i giggled out loud when I read the “Old Cranky’s” comment! Thanks!
By Rita T on 10/23/2008 9:11 am
f p
The concept of a “hockey mom” in Monolo Blahnks is hilarious.—of yes that goes for soccer moms, baseball moms, basketball moms, chess moms, lacrosse moms, debate moms, etc etc etc.
By f p on 10/23/2008 12:11 pm
Marjorie C.
Elaine: All candidates should wear American designer labels. LOL. For a long time, Obama wouldn’t even wear a teeny, tiny American lapel flag. Let’s not get all American Pie here. I don’t think your candidate believes in it.
By Marjorie C. on 10/22/2008 2:53 pm
sibelle daubigne
At least Palin is a nice doll to dress up, i wish Hillary could have had that side too!
By sibelle daubigne on 10/22/2008 3:38 pm
Marjorie C.
sibelle: At least Palin is a nice doll to dress up… Yes she is; she wears pretty clothes well. And her children, they are such an attractive family why not let them look their best. The only ones complaining about this is the Democrats. They seem to forget the price tag for their candidate’s rock concert in Germany — his foreign mission, so to speak.
By Marjorie C. on 10/23/2008 5:54 am