Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 02/27/2009 3:30 pm

In Expected Move, Obama Moves to Lift Bush's 'Conscience' Rule

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Getty Images

Women’s groups are hailing the Obama administration’s reported decision to roll back Bush-era protections for health-care workers who refuse to provide services because of moral objections.

"We heartily commend the Obama administration for recognizing this rule for what it is: a targeted attack on women’s health and rights. Rescinding this harmful rule is a step back from the precipice; women across the country will be able to breathe easier once their right to information and needed services has been fully restored," said Marcia D. Greenberger, co-president of the National Women’s Law Center.

The Bush administration regulation allowed federal funding to be cut off to any health-care facility that didn’t let doctors or nurses opt out of procedures — including abortion — to which they objected, or which were against their religious beliefs. Government officials told The Washington Post today that they’re reviewing a proposal to get rid of the regulation. Officials said the way it’s worded now is too broad and could restrict women from getting vital services. Family-planning groups have said it could even stretch to not giving women contraceptives. The Los Angeles Times notes that seven states and two family-planning groups have filed lawsuits against the regulation.

"We support a tightly written conscience clause. We recognize and understand that some providers have objections about abortion, and we want to make sure that current law protects them," a Health and Human Services official told the Post. "We want to be thoughtful about this." 

But the Christian Medical Association argues there’s no confusion about the rule, and that rescinding it is what puts women’s health at risk, "threatens health-care professionals’ freedom to practice medicine according to ethical standards and exposes the myth of moderation in Obama’s abortion policy."

It even goes as far to say that health-care workers serving some of the nation’s poorest populations could be adversely affected by the rule. "Infringing on their right to practice medicine according to these life-affirming ethical standards will force them to leave the profession and to shut down the hospitals and clinics," said the association’s CEO, David Stevens.

The debate over this controversial topic undoubtedly will heat up over the next month or so. We’ll keep you posted on all the developments!

394 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

S.J. Morgan
No doctor should be REQUIRED to perform abortions or give information regarding them.  If the patient requests  it they should be referred to someone who is supportive of it!  There are plenty of programs that provide that assistance.
By S.J. Morgan on 02/27/2009 3:43 pm
C. Aune

Can I ask you…should American Dr.s of Muslim faith be able to refuse to treat women? Should Pharmicists who practice white supremacy be able to refuse to fill a perscription for someone who is Asian?

Where do you draw the line?

If you don’t want to treat ALL patients then change professions. Use your Medical degree for research or work for a drug company. A Dr. takes an Oath that should be as serious to him as his faith…and if he can’t abide by that oath he needs to stop being a medical Dr.

By C. Aune on 02/27/2009 3:51 pm
S.J. Morgan

I do not think there is anything in the oath about taking a life?..their oath is to save lives.

Your speaking of a racial issue not a life & death issue.

By S.J. Morgan on 02/27/2009 5:03 pm
DeBúrca obj
SJ… no doctor is ever forced to perform abortions, they weren’t before the Bush law, and they won’t be after. THIS is about doctors refusing birth control prescriptions, and pharmacists refusing to fill them. Not just the morning after pill… ANY Birth Control. The fact is, in this country anyway, women are FULL citizens who are entitled to any healthcare available and legal. Period.
By DeBúrca obj on 02/27/2009 5:35 pm
f p
Well said. I fully agree.
By f p on 02/28/2009 7:56 am
DeBúrca obj

Even in "holy Catholic Ireland" where abortion isn’t even legal… ALL medical professionals are required to give Irish women full information. That is part of their Constitution.

No doctor is required here to perform abortions. But they are required to give all their patients full information, both men AND women. Also, you are going straight for the sensational with this… the fact is, the Bush rule even allowed pharmacists who were against birth control to refuse to fill a woman’s birth control prescription. That this was allowed showed Bush’s utter contempt for the rights of women to full and proper healthcare in this country.

By DeBúrca obj on 02/27/2009 4:15 pm
Rena Jean

You are 100% correct. The Conscience Rights Act was passed to keep doctors and nurses from being sued if they chose not to peform abortions.

Why would you FORCE someone to do a medical procedure on you that they don’t agree with - only for the pursuit of money and someone to blame other than yourself.

By Rena Jean on 02/28/2009 3:19 am
Libra Lady
Rena…oh so true..
By Libra Lady on 02/28/2009 9:39 am
freda rogers
I sooo agree.  My office doesnt even give the ‘morning after pill’ some people still believe murder is a crime…and I thank God for them!
By freda rogers on 02/28/2009 6:02 pm
mimi reinhard

If your interpretation of your religion keeps you from performing the job you have agreed to do, you should find another job. It’s that simple. Most of us do not believe that abortion, birth control and the morning after pill constitute murder. It’s your belief, not ours and in the United States of America, religion does not constitute law. That’s one of the reasons my ancestors came to this land-to avoid religious persecution. Therefore, I reject your attempt to force your religious belief on me and my body.

By mimi reinhard on 03/01/2009 6:43 am
freda rogers
Mimi..it would just take tooo long to bring you up to speed, but sometimes I wish some peoples job was NOT TO PLAY GOD.  I wonder if the job you wanted to do was to fly a plane, but on each flight you would have to choose one person to toss off the plane to their death and you had no CHOICE in this…how would you feel?
By freda rogers on 03/01/2009 12:47 pm
Courtney *
If you feel this way about peoples’ job being "to play God", then I suppose you do not go to the doctor when you are ill?  I have to agree with Mimi - if you "don’t want to play God" and your chosen profession makes you wonder if you are, you need to find a new profession. 
By Courtney * on 03/05/2009 7:29 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
I applaud your comment, mimi, but be prepared to get bombarded by persons with the earthly proximate of Olympus whose main concern, it seems, is not for women’s rights, but for the protection of all things embryonic.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 03/01/2009 4:32 pm
HA BIBI
So easy for you to say now isn’t it Phyllis, your mother allowed for you to get past that pesky embryonic stage!
By HA BIBI on 03/05/2009 5:09 pm
freda rogers
great comeback Elaine!!!  (HUGGS)
By freda rogers on 03/05/2009 7:38 pm