Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Money | 09/23/2008 9:50 am

Financial Crisis: Main Street Pushes Back as Fed Chief Warns 'Serious Consequences' for U.S. Economy Without $700B Bailout

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson © USTreas.gov

Congress needs to act quickly on the Bush administration’s proposed bank bailout in order to avoid “serious consequences” for the economy, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told lawmakers Tuesday morning.

Admitting that the extraordinary government measures taken so far — bailout of Freddie and Fannie Mac, for example — have failed to stabilize global financial markets, Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee that “global financial markets remain under extraordinary stress."  

Action by Congress is urgently required to stabilize the situation and avert what otherwise could be very serious consequences for our financial markets and for our economy,” he said.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said “the very health of our economy” is at risk.

“We saw market turmoil reach a new level last week, and spill over into the rest of the economy,” he added. “We must now take further, decisive action to fundamentally and comprehensively address the root cause of this turmoil.”

That root cause, he said, is the housing “correction” which has resulted in illiquid mortgage-related assets choking off the flow of credit.

Main Street: Why Should We Pay for Sins of Others?

Although the dirty details of the financial crisis are still hard for many people to follow, the central fact of the matter is clear to many: The taxpayers are on the hook for the bad judgment of others — those who bought houses they couldn’t really afford, the banks that urged them on and the people and institutions who spent more than they made.

"I’ve been financially responsible with my own money. Why should I now be responsible for the fact that you were not?" Ed Merkle, a 58-year-old defense contractor in Virginia who lives within his means and didn’t take on a huge loan even when his bank encouraged him to, told The Washington Post.

Many on Main Street are telling their representatives in Congress they don’t want taxpayer money to be used on the $700 bailout for those who should have known better.

The Post also reports that many lawmakers, after spending the weekend in their districts, are angry that average Americans are being forced to pay for the excesses of Wall Street and that Congress was being prodded to rubber-stamp the biggest federal intervention in the private market since the Great Depression.

"I walked down LaSalle Street on Friday, a great street in Chicago lined with banks and big office buildings," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-IL. "A lot of people came up and said, ‘Hi.’ But a lot of them came up and said: ‘Are you really going to do this? Seven hundred billion dollars bailing out the banks?’ And I said: ‘I don’t know. At the end of the day, I just don’t know.’"

A growing minority of lawmakers — including some Republicans — were starting to question the very premise of the Treasury Department’s proposal.

"In my judgment, it would be foolish to waste massive sums of taxpayer funds testing an idea that has been hastily crafted, and may actually cause the government to revert to an inadequate strategy of ad hoc bailouts," said Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the Senate banking committee. He urged Congress to "immediately undertake a comprehensive, public examination of the problem and alternative solutions rather than swiftly pass the current plan with minimal changes or discussion."

But Bernanke — and some other Republican leaders — tried to stress that there’s no time for broader regulatory changes now; they can be looked at later, after the crisis has been dealt with.

“When there’s a fire in your kitchen threatening to burn down your home, you don’t want someone stopping the firefighters on the way and demanding they hand out smoke detectors first or lecturing you about the hazards of keeping paint in the basement,” said Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY. “You want them to put out the fire before it burns down your home and everything you’ve saved for your whole life.”

Acknowledging that the GOP has "many serious questions," McConnell — who is trying to recast the bailout as a "Main Street Rescue Plan" — said the plan would give Americans "the security of knowing that the problems on Wall Street are not going to spread to Main Street."

In other financial news:

-The New York Times reports that congressional leaders and Treasury officials are close to an agreement over a proposal by some Democrats in which taxpayers could receive an ownership stake, in the form of warrants to buy stock, from firms seeking to sell distressed debt as part of the $700 bailout package. One Treasury official said lawmakers want to require an equity stake, while the administration wants flexibility on that matter.

-The turmoil on Wall Street is also hitting the $2.5 trillion hedge-fund industry, threatening the viability of some of the massive investment pools that have become increasingly critical for pension funds and endowments and a source of financing for consumer loans. Industry groups say they are responsible for more than a third of stock trades, while some analysts worry that a collapse of a major fund could shake confidence in the fragile system.

-A sale of Lehman Brothers’ European arm may be in the works, reports Reuters, while Japanese firms are leading the rush to acquire U.S. investment banking assets after top bank Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group said on Monday it would buy up to 20 percent of Morgan Stanley for as much as $8.5 billion and Nomura Holdings bought Lehman’s franchise in Japan and Australia and 3,000 staff. 

29 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Barbara Taylor
I’m concerned about rushing into this proposal. Government on both sides got us in this mess, along with Wall Street greed. One or two weeks more of serious discussiong should not make a difference. First we bail out Bear Sterns - they say it will be ok now. Then we bail out Freddie and Fannie - they said all is right with the world now Then AIG, it seems to keep going. It does not appear they know what to do.
By Barbara Taylor on 09/23/2008 10:02 am
Ms. Dee
Well, then, Japan may just end up owning Lehman Brothers (wouldn’t that be something) or any other stock that’s way down. We either buy it or let it go.
By Ms. Dee on 09/23/2008 9:58 pm
Kathrine Gluvna
There are several things about this bailout that scare me. The fact that it is being pushed though so quickly and with so much fear talk makes me want to stop and think. The fact that the Powers that Be want no discussion raises a huge red flag. Also - the fact that some members of Congress want salary caps and limits is a good thing. Why are Bush and his croneys fighting on that? Why should the CEOs who had a huge part in causing this crisis walk away with large serverence packages and large salaries? Why should they be rewarded for their greed?
By Kathrine Gluvna on 09/23/2008 10:08 am
Deni G
I am trying to figure why they should be trusted to fix this mess. What about anything they have done, engenders trust, vision, innovation, foresight, or ability? We should take all the power and put it in the hands of the Executive and give them a key to the Treasury, with no oversight, no consultation, no review and exempt them from all laws. Why? The Executive, who walked us right into this mess? The Executive who said over and over and over the foundations of our economy are strong and we’re just whiners, it’s all in our heads? The Executive who have f*cked up every single thing they have touched that involved we, the people. Yet they seem to take very good care of the Billionaire Boys. Isn’t that what got us into this mess, times ten? Isn’t that, in effect, a dictatorship? It’s our godd*mn money. And they’re not going to use any of it to help us. Once more with the trickle down theory. They don’t even feel like they have to make their case in front of the American people. They just say ‘give us the power, give us the money and really we won’t screw you, this time’. Like hell they won’t.

By Deni G on 09/23/2008 10:16 am
Obama Biden
you go Deni!! you are absolutly correct!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i got an e-mail and i need to discuss it so i have areply but i dont know that i should post it out here so im going to put my e-mail out here and you send me an e-mail then i will send it to you?
By Obama Biden on 09/23/2008 4:02 pm
Ms. Dee
Deni, this is more like aristocracy without a sovereign of any kind. Privilege run amok. By the time you read this, Congress will have made some progress on the oversight issue…according to The News Hour.
By Ms. Dee on 09/23/2008 10:04 pm
Patty E
Oh I agree with everybody here, so far. Why not put a cap of the CEO salary? If the CEO will be working for the taxpayers? makes sense to me! Why the rush to get a bailout from the taxpayers, instead of going the to the companies and the people, who all in some sort of collusive decision making created the problem to begin with? WHY, oh WHY, did Paulson insist that whatever was done, HE, personally, could not be sued, questioned, records to be sealed, no investigation…all of that? I hear that last night on Rachel Maddow—-if Paulson fails, he is not to be held accountable??!! Why is there now a sneak in line item for credit card debt and some other debt (business debt?) which my senior moment has taken from me, but WHY 2 other ‘problems’ when this was to have been for the purpose of MORTGAGE meltdown and foreclosures? WHY, if the whole world is at risk, is it ONLY the USA that is responsible for correcting it? Just what do we owe the rest of the world, that is so seriously evil, that no other country will help until OUR Congress allows this, minus explanation and transparency. The policies of this administration—-which in my opinion were exptreme as opposed to wise balance—-seems to be turning us into a 3rd world country…..yet the policy-makers are getting off scot-free!!!!! Might explain why the Republicans on the committee are asking some hard questions—must be they want to get re-elected….sorry, that was a hit below the belt—-but without ANYone questioning the lack of regulation of the rules, those rules that were already in place, those rules that were ignored—we not only find ourselves in this mess, but the people elected to govern—-failed to do so—-so why not cut the salaries for a year, of all the legislators, as well? And raise their taxes too? Just like they have done to us?
By Patty E on 09/23/2008 12:46 pm
Ms. Dee
Well, y’know. The taxpayers are always paying for something. Whatever sort of deal they make, a new tax structure could make sure the fat cats get hurt first. It’s not like rich folks don’t pay any taxes at all. Obama’s plan might protect 90% of taxpayers from any involvement in the risk. But oversight is an absolute must. I mean, correct me if I’m wrong, but misrepresenting the value of assetts is, at the very least, tax fraud. Right?
By Ms. Dee on 09/23/2008 10:14 pm
Patty E
Watching the hearings, a thought went thru my head—-(watch out below) haha…why not pull our troops out of Iraq now? to save some money. And while we are at it, why not demand all those OVERpayments to contractors, to be returned to the Federal Budget? How about finding out who was getting the ‘missing oil’ that somehow no one knew where it was going, and to whom? I always wondered about that. What if we salaried the President according to the job he has SUCCESSFULLY completed? We could get about 6 years of his salary returned to the Federal Budget. Add to that, his ‘leisure travel’ around the world, the past year. And the Salaries of those in the SEC who failed to perform THEIR duties? When did Cox take over that position?
By Patty E on 09/23/2008 1:02 pm
Jennifer Dooley
First, Yo! wOw. Are the other post today to cheer us up! This is the first post I have seen that is a discussion that should be taking place. I think we should, The People should be asking the questions!! No Way do they get to Bully us into excepting one of their Fear proposals. Especially one that is a No Fix be their own omissions, just a stop gap! or as they say,’A bridge!” The biggest most expensive “Bridge To No Where” ever and those built in a hurry, collapse. Good Grief..I want to shack the world right now! I will be revisiting Deepak after I write this! But I do appreciate having a place to Let it out, So I can Let It Go…And Politically, the who’s fault has to just stop. WE can take this all the way back to The Revolutionary War and the decision to print more money when we went broke during that war. That is why when it came to setting up our original government that Debit was considered one of the greatest of ills. The Economic and Political systems are broken. Large portions of our Lands and Companies, Banks Housing, Do not even belong to us anymore. It is time to Stop, Breath and quit throwing Oil on our fires!!! We need to remember, that we can get through what ever it takes to survive! We did it after the Great Depression, We did it during World War II. we have a history of Being Able. But We are reacting out of Fear. Logically we know that Good decisions are not made in that mind frame. Getting into the Two Wars in The Middle East, are results of Fear,followed with, Knee Jerk Reactions. Let’s not repeat, “The Writing On The Wall”. “Fool me once, Shame on You. Fool me twice, shame on Me!”. Personally I think that although that have profited from the gains made since 1999, should have their accounts frozen along with those government officials that profited to! Put that money in a bank account and let it gain interest, while the talks that need to take place do! I want more, not just what this Temporary stall is going to do. I want to hear the FIX, in great detail!!! I feel bad for Secretary Paulson, but please it time to step a side immediately!!! You believe in a Broken System, We need a whole new one! I am sure that you mean well, who would want to have their time in history be yours. Of course you want a quick fix, but The Buck , Stop Now!. i also would like those that should be Criminal Charged, Be. I want the little guys to Sue all those othrs that gained off the backs of the people, be found liable for their losses. I am pleased to see so many different Senators, both sides of the Aisel, SAY, NO! NOT SO FAST. I would like both campaigns to stop Politicizing this issue, it HELPS not! How about admitting that we need to forget about the Election right now. The part that is ME, ME, ME,!!! McCain don’t take that public money for your Campaign. Both of you stop with the T.V. adds! No m ore going from town to town, spend the time coming up with Real Plans that have a noticeable Finnish! Give the money to the people that you got it from or to a general fund! It the economics in excess that even our Elections have become! Hillary had 20million Dollars of Debt, and it is Obscene the money that has gone into your campaigns. Think of the Good those funds could have done for the People. Maybe we should have Co Presidents until these serious problems are solved! And While were at it, we no longer need the Electoral College. That was put into place before Modern Transportation and Technology. We could Fix that too!. No Two party stuff and no Electoral College! Question, why do we have huge debt owned by countries such as China. When we supposedly are in Iraq for The Iraqis, that have Billions of Dollars in their Treasury, why at least did we not borrow from them instead of selling it to China?
By Jennifer Dooley on 09/23/2008 2:22 pm
Jennifer Dooley
I Told You I Would Go See Deepak after I Let This out…Today He Brought Music …My American Prayer Dave Stewart http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1QpTMdzGLQ
By Jennifer Dooley on 09/23/2008 6:21 pm
Ms. Dee
First of all, the best thing we can do is adhere as closely as possible to Constitutional procedure. Congress can move with deliberate speed without ripping up the fundamentals of our legal process. These Congressmen who threw up the red flags, and then stuck around to talk
By Ms. Dee on 09/23/2008 10:36 pm
Jennifer Dooley
The Constitution is suppose to be a Living Document, not a Stael Dogma. That is why the Founding Fathers put in , The How To Amend. I for one am always glad to stop and see what Red Flags are trying to say. “Haste makes waste”< if you try to do something quickly, without planning it, you’re likely to end up spending more time, money, etc, doing it.
By Jennifer Dooley on 09/24/2008 11:29 am
Ms. Dee
We certainly could terminate our contracts with Blackwater. And then write an amendment banning the formation of mercenary armies. And a usury amendment…something like, “Nobody gets to charge you admission to your own bank account.”
By Ms. Dee on 09/23/2008 10:23 pm
Deni G
I would like to hear from everybody on this topic. But it is hidden away. Nobody even knows this, the most important topic of the day, is on this site. Remove one of the ‘50 sexiest men’ and put this on the front page. We are women. We are affected by this. I want to know how all the women here feel.
By Deni G on 09/23/2008 2:19 pm