lolololol

And there will always be people who claim that 2 + 2 = 5. Progressive = communist in those same people’s minds. Mr. Sosa I recommend therapy as soon as possible for you.

This is definintely a case of putting a political agenda before science. There is no actual scientific evidence to show man-made global warming—the evidence to support that there is even global warming at all is also under question. The temperature of the earth supposedly increased by a degree or half a degree—first of all, this is within the margin of error and the readings supporting this are suspect—now it is believed that a cooling cycle is underway. The cooling and warming cycles that have occurred throughout time on this planet have correlated to sun surface activity and there have been concomittant observable changes on the earth’s surface—-ie evidence for grape growing on greenland that coincides with a particular warming period in history. As to man made global warming, there are actually no scientific experiments or data proving that CO2 increases cause global warming. The entire theory (or lie), is based on computer modelling studies— computer models—no real scientific data—no actual science has been done. The only “data” ever presented to uphold this “theory” is computer modelling of CO2 changes over time. This data is theoretical and only looks at increase in CO2. The entire global warming lie is based on these computer models. The theory holds that with increases in CO2, you get increased greenhouse effect, and therefore trap heat in the atomosphere. Unfortunately, CO2 accounts for a tiny percentage of this effect, there are several other factors involved, most importantly water vapor and these are not accounted for in these models. You cannot look at one variable in such a complex system and extrapolate any scientific conclusions—especially when the conclusions are not based on actual data, but modelling. Furthermore, all kinds of anecdotal observations have been made linking some environmental change to man-made global warming without one bit of science applied to them. The people who want to further this lie claim the “debate” is over because “global warming” is a fact. These type of proclamations by supposed experts—ie algore are very reckless. He is not a scientist and he and the left have used this issue politically, trying to convince people of something that just is not true. The media is complicit and therefore, the lie is not uncovered. There is no scientific evidence to prove global warming and there is certainly no scientific evidence to show so-called “man-made climate change”. This is the gimick of the left, to make the pronouncement “the debate is over, global warming is a fact, so just accept it”. They are politicizing this issue to further their own agenda and the public is not educated enough in the actual science to understand this. This is irresponsible, but the left does not care, as long as everyone goes along with this ridiculous idea of “global warming” or “climate change” so they can implement absurd restrictions on our freedoms in the name of “saving the planet”. There are many scientists out there who know this is an agenda driven canard. Just a cursory understanding of the carbon cycle makes these claims laughable. But unfortunately, most of the public is not scientifically educated, so they believe this lie.

You speak almost entirely in rhetoric, which does nothing to support your point and paints you as a parrot. How exactly would you propose we “defend ourselves from the UN and these politicians?” Overthrow the government? Vote in the next election? Refuse to pay our taxes? Drive on Spare the Air days? Build a giant bonfire with Gore’s books? What? Use your own thoughts and words, if you have any.