Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 06/26/2008 10:00 am

Message to All Whining Female Democrats: Hillary's Out. Get Over It, by Barbara Goldsmith

By Barbara Goldsmith
© iStock

Editor’s Note: Barbara Goldsmith is a prize-winning bestselling author and historian. She served on the Presidential Commission for the Celebration of Women in America History during President Clinton’s administration.

"Whoever is set up to be president of the United States is just set up to have his character torn off from his back in shreds and to be mauled, pummeled and covered with dirt by every filthy paper all over the country. And no woman that was not willing to be dragged through every kennel, and slopped into every dirty pail of water like an old mop, would ever consent to run as a candidate. Why, it’s an ordeal that kills a man. It killed General Harrison and it killed old Zach [Taylor]. And what sort of … a woman would it be that could stand it and come out of it without being killed?"

So commented Harriet Beecher Stowe when Victoria Woodhull announced her bid for the presidency in 1872.

The place: a distinguished publisher’s Park Avenue apartment. The date: Wednesday, June 18. The time: 8:45 AM. The occasion: a breakfast hosted by Gloria Steinem. The stated objective: to bring the Women for Barack Obama and the Hillary Clinton supporters into one cohesive group.

These emotional outbursts ... are just what male chauvinists say about woman's incapacity to coolly assess a situation.

The little blonde stood, arms akimbo, and vented her wrath: "I am a good friend of Hillary’s," she declared. "I’ve had her at my home, and I have always been there for her. I am here to tell you how angry and hurt I am and how hurt all Hillary supporters are by the sexist, disgusting way Hillary was attacked and pilloried by the media in this campaign. Until some acknowledgment of that is made, I am full of anger. I know the Democratic Party could have stopped it. I know Obama could have stopped it. But, everyone was silent and just let it happen and …"

Next up: a professor who took a full six minutes announcing her credentials and then said, "I used up my entire pension supporting Hillary. I went to 13 states and knocked on doors. I want everyone in this room to write in the name of Hillary Clinton on the ballot when they go to vote and …"

Another woman announced that she intended to launch a boycott of MSNBC. "I want all of you to sign my petition."

The chairperson of "Women for Obama," Becky Carroll, had flown in from Chicago and said she was tired. You’d be tired too with all that invective flying around the room. But Ms. Carroll couldn’t very well intervene, if catharsis was what was needed to unite Democratic women. Ms. Carroll was in a tough position – too tough to point out that Hillary Clinton had announced that her supporters should "take our energy, our passion, our strength and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama …" These emotional outbursts — and there were several more — are just what male chauvinists say about woman’s incapacity to coolly assess a situation.

Please note that so far there’s been no "I" word in my comments. The "I did this, I did that, I am hurt, I may not vote, I may vote for McCain," and so forth that have been heard lately may be what’s holding Democratic women back from fulfilling their potential to become a powerful coalition that could help guide this country back to safer ground.

581 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

rocky rocky
This shocks me. So did the news that all of the candidates spent what they called “street money” in some areas. Maybe we need to do a better job of nurturing idealism and citizenship in our children. The adults are a lost cause.
By rocky rocky on 06/28/2008 11:21 am
rocky rocky
There should be huge headlines everywhere outing those who have messed with or encouraged or sponsored voting fraud of any kind. Shame on them! Gosh, I keep thinking of those doomed Roman senators who only wanted to bring back the Republic, generation after generation, always defeated by greed and pride until finally …
By rocky rocky on 06/28/2008 11:42 am
Tee Zee
Well said Beverly!
By Tee Zee on 06/28/2008 11:31 am
GEORGE WU, A.I.A.
Now Israel has to change its support from Hillary to McCain in order to get the U.S. troops to continue to stay in Iraq! If not, Obama would keep his promise to withdraw the troops( within 16 months, he said), then it will be too late for Israel to get protection from the U.S.troops. Bloomberg is just to wait for another four years to go to the White House as the V.P. again. Sorry, Everything did not come out as planned!—-dancewu(dot)net
By GEORGE WU, A.I.A. on 06/26/2008 2:04 pm
Gordon Bailey
I don’t really have a comment on the whole Hillary issue, but as far as McCain’s lack of computer expertise, that doesn’t surprise me or dismay me (if it is in fact true). I would put it down to a generational thing more than anything else. It’s certainly not a measure of intelligence; both of my parents are extremely smart but won’t have anything to do with computers. In addition, I think bringing the issue up in the first place demonstrates a kind of naivete on the part of some posters here. Big-time politicians just don’t live like the rest of us. They are assisted and catered to every second of the day, they don’t go grocery shopping, they don’t carry money, they don’t pick up the kids from school. It’s a completely different existence from what most people experience day to day, and I hardly think John McCain is unique in that regard.
By Gordon Bailey on 06/26/2008 2:23 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Gordon - I agree with you but you do realize that the fact that Senator McCain is not computer literate (???) will be a made into a issue by those who oppose him for other issues as well? Each political party has the normal list of accusations: For the GOP, they will claim lack of experience and political associations (Wright etc.) and the Dems will be raising Supreme Court fears and the anti-war mantra. However, the success of the candidacy may well depend on other factors. Cash would be foremost on the list and secondly might be the race issue. Senator Obama has already raised the issue against Senator McCain by stating that the Republican Party will start it’s race baiting campaign by simply bringing up the fact of Obama’s race. Now, John McCain is doing a fairly good job about clamping a lid on a race based political race, but I fear Obama is not. He apparently wants the issue raised and he will raise it himself, as he did last Friday in his speech before a largely African American audience. My comment about the Senator Clinton supporters is twofold. Leave them be and secondly, to deny the sexism charge is absolutely unbelievable. It was not even subtle in many instances. For example, how many comments were made about her “tailored” pant suits? Dozens. I didn’t hear any comments about Senator Obama’s fashion sense or need for it. Did you hear the news commentators chuckling condescendly when the woman was able to drink a shot of whiskey without flinching? Oh yes, sexism was apparent.
By Bonnie Oliver on 06/26/2008 2:47 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Bonnie, Thank you for pointing out the sexism. That, and other comments, offended me too (and I did not support Hillary). I look forward to posts from Wow where they can discuss each candidate’s position on major issues. I liked the McCain of 2000, and hoped he would get the nomination. But, the Republican machine wanted Bush. The McCain I see now doesn’t have the spark he once had. I don’t think it’s age, I just think he is trying too hard with the far-right.
By Brooklyn Gal on 06/26/2008 3:15 pm
Elisabeth S
Carol, i agree; that is what I have been thinking. I liked McCain in 2000; might have voted for him. But he is pandering and changing his positions. i had such respect for him when he stood up for what he believed. It is obviously a problem with all politicians; the closer they get to the “big office”, they just can’t resist the pursuit of the power at all costs!
By Elisabeth S on 06/26/2008 5:55 pm
beverly linens
II voted for McCain in the primaries 8 years ago. We all should know if he was the same man he wouldn’t be the nominated candidate. The powerful in the present Republican party worked hard against him. For now he is the best Republican around but we can’t afford even him making conservative nominations for the supreme court right now. I feel badly that I can’t vote for him, because I like him.
By beverly linens on 06/26/2008 7:13 pm
GEORGE WU, A.I.A.
Carol: Who are the people of the “FAR-RIGHT” you think they are. Do you know the names of any?—-dancewu(dot)net
By GEORGE WU, A.I.A. on 07/04/2008 12:41 am
GEORGE WU, A.I.A.
I think I just asked a stupid question a moment ago! We do not even know the names of the powerful “FAR-RIGHT” who planned the invasion to Iraq to protect Isael , how do we know who is supprting the next president to have the troops to stay in Iraq forever?—-dancewu(dot)net
By GEORGE WU, A.I.A. on 07/04/2008 1:01 am
kat
Absolutely get over it. The die was cast. All of the women who support the Democratic Party must either abide by the choice or vote for Mr. McCain. Hillary is a big girl, she knew what she was getting into and how the media works. Her supporters to rally around her decision to back Mr. Obama.
By kat on 06/26/2008 2:27 pm
Ellen Lincourt
And yet the assumption continues… So, Hillary owns the votes of her supporters?! They lack the ability of independent thought? The problem with your statement and with the Democratic Party is that their is an assumption that either Clinton or the Democratic Party owns the votes of women. Please, women can pick and choose what is in their own best interest. Some of them chose Obama, some chose Clinton and some even chose McCain. Now they can choose between Obama, McCain, a 3rd choice or they can choose not to vote at all. But most of all the vote of each person belongs ONLY to themselves.
By Ellen Lincourt on 06/26/2008 2:51 pm
Michael Miller
All I know is I’m getting a little tired of having to train ethnic minorities and ladies who have now decided to come back to the work place. A problem with the democrats as always been to throw money at problems, I’m tired of working two jobs and having my money spent on people who don’t want to work. I’m sorry your job was sent to India, go to work for Walmart.
By Michael Miller on 06/26/2008 2:47 pm
Star Lawrence
Uh…what?
By Star Lawrence on 06/26/2008 2:54 pm