Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 06/26/2008 10:00 am

Message to All Whining Female Democrats: Hillary's Out. Get Over It, by Barbara Goldsmith

By Barbara Goldsmith
© iStock

Editor’s Note: Barbara Goldsmith is a prize-winning bestselling author and historian. She served on the Presidential Commission for the Celebration of Women in America History during President Clinton’s administration.

"Whoever is set up to be president of the United States is just set up to have his character torn off from his back in shreds and to be mauled, pummeled and covered with dirt by every filthy paper all over the country. And no woman that was not willing to be dragged through every kennel, and slopped into every dirty pail of water like an old mop, would ever consent to run as a candidate. Why, it’s an ordeal that kills a man. It killed General Harrison and it killed old Zach [Taylor]. And what sort of … a woman would it be that could stand it and come out of it without being killed?"

So commented Harriet Beecher Stowe when Victoria Woodhull announced her bid for the presidency in 1872.

The place: a distinguished publisher’s Park Avenue apartment. The date: Wednesday, June 18. The time: 8:45 AM. The occasion: a breakfast hosted by Gloria Steinem. The stated objective: to bring the Women for Barack Obama and the Hillary Clinton supporters into one cohesive group.

These emotional outbursts ... are just what male chauvinists say about woman's incapacity to coolly assess a situation.

The little blonde stood, arms akimbo, and vented her wrath: "I am a good friend of Hillary’s," she declared. "I’ve had her at my home, and I have always been there for her. I am here to tell you how angry and hurt I am and how hurt all Hillary supporters are by the sexist, disgusting way Hillary was attacked and pilloried by the media in this campaign. Until some acknowledgment of that is made, I am full of anger. I know the Democratic Party could have stopped it. I know Obama could have stopped it. But, everyone was silent and just let it happen and …"

Next up: a professor who took a full six minutes announcing her credentials and then said, "I used up my entire pension supporting Hillary. I went to 13 states and knocked on doors. I want everyone in this room to write in the name of Hillary Clinton on the ballot when they go to vote and …"

Another woman announced that she intended to launch a boycott of MSNBC. "I want all of you to sign my petition."

The chairperson of "Women for Obama," Becky Carroll, had flown in from Chicago and said she was tired. You’d be tired too with all that invective flying around the room. But Ms. Carroll couldn’t very well intervene, if catharsis was what was needed to unite Democratic women. Ms. Carroll was in a tough position – too tough to point out that Hillary Clinton had announced that her supporters should "take our energy, our passion, our strength and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama …" These emotional outbursts — and there were several more — are just what male chauvinists say about woman’s incapacity to coolly assess a situation.

Please note that so far there’s been no "I" word in my comments. The "I did this, I did that, I am hurt, I may not vote, I may vote for McCain," and so forth that have been heard lately may be what’s holding Democratic women back from fulfilling their potential to become a powerful coalition that could help guide this country back to safer ground.

581 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Dan Sarazen
Very well said. What we should be concerned with is the cost of the Iraq war. Notice our taxes didn’t go up? That was the first time in US history that we didn’t raise taxes to pay for a war. Where did the money come from? We’ve borrowed anywhere from $600,000,000,000 to $1,000,000,000,000 to fund the war. This has been one by way of issuing bonds to be repaid by another generation, at a later date (Read my 18 month old son and his generation). Who holds these bonds? China holds about 28% and Japan holds about 23%. This is causing inflation and is dragging down the middle class. And the GOP is supposed to stand for National Security? Sounds to me like they’ve sold the farm to our world competitors. Fight for America. Obama 08’
By Dan Sarazen on 06/27/2008 9:42 am
Star Lawrence
So you’re saying Obama will raise taxes big time?
By Star Lawrence on 06/27/2008 12:02 pm
Dan Sarazen
It’s either raise taxes or cut spending. Take your pick. Would you prefer that we cripple our children’s future the rest of the way by ignoring the debt? Choose, raise taxes or cut spending. I really don’t care which one we choose so long as we get the debt back to a manageable figure. Are should we continue to borrow to pay off the debt? Or maybe tax cuts will somehow generate surpluses? But isn’t that a definition for insanity? Doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results? So, what do YOU want to do?
By Dan Sarazen on 06/27/2008 1:18 pm
Bonnie Oliver
If taxes are raised without qualification as to their intent, people will no longer wonder if this country is in a recession. The monthly GNP will drop which it has not yet done thought growth has been minimal. Once the GNP drops, everyone had better run for cover and that means the whole world.
By Bonnie Oliver on 06/27/2008 9:19 pm
K O
Thanks for your opinion, MaryJane. I’ve asked this before of our participants who intend to vote for John McCain, and like Bonnie, feel you support your position very rationally. I don’t agree with your conclusion, but certainly appreciate you sharing your opinions.
By K O on 06/27/2008 9:57 am
Frannie Em
Kitty, Some justices have come out and stated that it is a waste of time. They are not interested in and won’t overturn it. I am not trying to get a vote for McCain. I may sit this one out to tell you the truth. It would cause social unrest. They won it on the 14th amendment, the right to privacy. I believe the importance of it is keeping the government out of my medical choices. They do not have a right to decide for me. I do not believe in abortion, that is my choice, but I do not believe that I have the right to tell other women what to do with their bodies.
By Frannie Em on 06/27/2008 10:25 am
K O
Thanks, Frannie. I value your opinion.
By K O on 06/27/2008 12:21 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Frannie Em - Exactly.
By Bonnie Oliver on 06/27/2008 4:01 pm
Elisabeth S
Frannie Em, Thanks for that. That is and always has been how I feel, since before Roe vs.Wade. W e can’t go back to the days of backroom abortions, but we have to do more to reduce the need for them. Seems as if accountability is what is lacking is so many segments of our society; government, corporations, individuals?
By Elisabeth S on 06/27/2008 8:46 pm
Frannie Em
Elizabeth S. The abortion rate has fallen pretty consistently since 1981. It wasn’t long after that the safe sex campaign began because of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. I have always wondered why abortion isn’t less than it is because of the safe sex issue all of campaigns in this country to educate people. I think the abortion rate is about 1 in 5 pregnancies. THat seems too high. They teach safe sex in Jr Hi and middle school, that is pretty early, so even is a teenager isn’t sexually active, they know the dangers of unsafe sex. You are right. We need to reduce the need for them.
By Frannie Em on 06/28/2008 4:59 pm
beverly linens
Frannie Em, I’m told that abstinence is taught, rather than safe sex in most schools. I’m many years past having to deal with this myself, it’s been about 42 years since I sat my son and his best friend down to tell them about passion, self control, self respect and respect for the girl. I discussed safe sex as well. Because my daughter who was15 months younger wouldn’t go away, she got it too. She tells me today that the thing I said to her that stuck in her mind was, “Don’t do anything unless you are ready to deal with the consequence’s”. Considering the Supreme Courts decision Friday on Guns, I think we should be concerned about Roe v Wade. As a Republican I will not vote for McCain for that reason alone. I don’t believe we can afford to have him replace any more liberal justices with conservatives. I’m afraid I was probably the first person to being that up here weeks ago, I believe it is very important. Makes me kinda sad, I like McCain and voted for him in the primaries 8 years ago. The push against government involvement in the support of birth control started under Reagan, he even with-held funding for the UN over the issue.
By beverly linens on 06/29/2008 10:34 am
Frannie Em
Beverly, Have you read Dorothy’s posts about Roe V Wade? She answers a lot of questions. They can’t overturn it because it was a Supreme court ruling.
By Frannie Em on 06/29/2008 4:02 pm
Frannie Em
Mary Jane I agree. Since it has been law for 35 years it is considered a precedent, or a law that our society accepts as valid and part of our social make up. The justices don’t want to waste time on it. It is already an established law. There is no going back on it at this point, and it would be a waste of time.
By Frannie Em on 06/27/2008 10:16 am
Potus I
The Roberts court overturned over 70 years of settled law yesterday with their decision on the 2d Amendment. Moreover, these “original intent” guys decided that the first clause wasn’t relevant…
By Potus I on 06/28/2008 2:28 am
rocky rocky
If you mean that we shouldn’t be complacent about what the SC will or won’t do, you’re correct, in my opinion. No telling what another one, two, or three “conservatives” like Scalia and Thomas would do — old established law or not.
By rocky rocky on 06/28/2008 11:58 am