Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 06/26/2008 10:00 am

Message to All Whining Female Democrats: Hillary's Out. Get Over It, by Barbara Goldsmith

By Barbara Goldsmith
© iStock

Editor’s Note: Barbara Goldsmith is a prize-winning bestselling author and historian. She served on the Presidential Commission for the Celebration of Women in America History during President Clinton’s administration.

"Whoever is set up to be president of the United States is just set up to have his character torn off from his back in shreds and to be mauled, pummeled and covered with dirt by every filthy paper all over the country. And no woman that was not willing to be dragged through every kennel, and slopped into every dirty pail of water like an old mop, would ever consent to run as a candidate. Why, it’s an ordeal that kills a man. It killed General Harrison and it killed old Zach [Taylor]. And what sort of … a woman would it be that could stand it and come out of it without being killed?"

So commented Harriet Beecher Stowe when Victoria Woodhull announced her bid for the presidency in 1872.

The place: a distinguished publisher’s Park Avenue apartment. The date: Wednesday, June 18. The time: 8:45 AM. The occasion: a breakfast hosted by Gloria Steinem. The stated objective: to bring the Women for Barack Obama and the Hillary Clinton supporters into one cohesive group.

These emotional outbursts ... are just what male chauvinists say about woman's incapacity to coolly assess a situation.

The little blonde stood, arms akimbo, and vented her wrath: "I am a good friend of Hillary’s," she declared. "I’ve had her at my home, and I have always been there for her. I am here to tell you how angry and hurt I am and how hurt all Hillary supporters are by the sexist, disgusting way Hillary was attacked and pilloried by the media in this campaign. Until some acknowledgment of that is made, I am full of anger. I know the Democratic Party could have stopped it. I know Obama could have stopped it. But, everyone was silent and just let it happen and …"

Next up: a professor who took a full six minutes announcing her credentials and then said, "I used up my entire pension supporting Hillary. I went to 13 states and knocked on doors. I want everyone in this room to write in the name of Hillary Clinton on the ballot when they go to vote and …"

Another woman announced that she intended to launch a boycott of MSNBC. "I want all of you to sign my petition."

The chairperson of "Women for Obama," Becky Carroll, had flown in from Chicago and said she was tired. You’d be tired too with all that invective flying around the room. But Ms. Carroll couldn’t very well intervene, if catharsis was what was needed to unite Democratic women. Ms. Carroll was in a tough position – too tough to point out that Hillary Clinton had announced that her supporters should "take our energy, our passion, our strength and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama …" These emotional outbursts — and there were several more — are just what male chauvinists say about woman’s incapacity to coolly assess a situation.

Please note that so far there’s been no "I" word in my comments. The "I did this, I did that, I am hurt, I may not vote, I may vote for McCain," and so forth that have been heard lately may be what’s holding Democratic women back from fulfilling their potential to become a powerful coalition that could help guide this country back to safer ground.

581 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Dan Sarazen
OK, I watched it, in it’s entirety, and the basic message is that Hillary was running for public office and was brutalized by the media. Know what? That happens all the time, see Mike Dukakis. It goes with running for office. She couldn’t overcome it and you wanted Obama to come to her rescue? No. The First Woman President will take this issue head on, ala Anne Richards, and will turn the attacks to her advantage. But cry victim? That won’t do. And I didn’t see her jumping into Obama’s defense when Jeremiah Wright was being in the limelight. My GOP friends are far far nastier to her. They refer to her as “Shillary.” The things I’ve heard from Rush and the rest of the GOP talking machine are much worse, so you’ll find nothing but opportunistic “friends” there.
By Dan Sarazen on 06/27/2008 8:30 pm
Ava Taylor
Mmmm, I can just feel the hope and change emanating from you. Si se puede!
By Ava Taylor on 06/28/2008 11:51 am
beverly linens
Hey guys, Hillary handled the attacks on her just fine, It was Bill who didn’t.
By beverly linens on 06/28/2008 3:35 pm
Ava Taylor
I think boh the Clintons handled the attacks fine. Only the media claimed otherwise, but they are so biased toward Obama they might as well get paid by his campaign. Which is why they’ve lost all credibility with moderates.
By Ava Taylor on 06/29/2008 3:13 pm
Frannie Em
Dan, As I recall, the joke doesn’t necessarily include Senators. It is just a Catch-22 situation. If someone asks you “when did you stop beating your wife?” or “are you still beating your wife” - point is that by answering no, you are implying that you used to beat your wife, when you didn’t beat your wife. Right? There is no way to answer the question without compromising yourself. Isn’t that what McCain was trying to imply? I am not a great fan of McCains, but I get so tired when dumb situations like that are twisted and made into a talking point. It is just an intellectual displeasure, and so forced and on the surface. It always amazes me when people get so angry over something that has nothing to do with a solution for the upcoming social security and medicare problem, or getting our guys out of the Middle East. Politicians position themselves best they can. The interviewer new the answer before he asked, okay, so what? That’s all he’s got?
By Frannie Em on 06/27/2008 4:22 pm
Count Snarkula
Well, when it is all said and done, I think it comes down to character. And I just could never allow myself to vote for a man who would call a woman (his own wife yet) the “c” word. I just can’t get past that, and hopefully, never will. Senator McCain is not a gentleman. That still matters to some of us.
By Count Snarkula on 06/27/2008 12:32 pm
Star Lawrence
I agree—character. Why I am not for Obama. Aren’t politics fun?
By Star Lawrence on 06/27/2008 12:43 pm
Marjorie C.
Couldn’t resist this one from PolitickerNH.com “Two well-known New Hampshire Democrats have endorsed the Republican Party’s presumptive presidential nominee. Jim McConaha and Valery Mitchell, who have pledged their support to U.S. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), will serve as co-chairs of ‘New Hampshire Democrats for McCain.’ … “‘It was not easy to step away from my party in the McCain-Obama race, but I want a president whose judgment we know and trust, and a leader who will do what is in the best interest of our country without regard to politics or ideology,’ Mitchell said in a campaign press release.” More whiners?
By Marjorie C. on 06/27/2008 1:01 pm
Dan Sarazen
We know John McCain’s judgment and character? He’s flip-flopped on every position he’s ever had. Do we chalk all of his previous positions to “Youthful indiscretion?” Also, only 2? That’s it? Of the 30,000,000 votes Hillary gained, only two from New Hampshire are voting for McCain? Sounds like a Obama win to me. I’ll chalk it up to anecdotal evidence.
By Dan Sarazen on 06/27/2008 1:06 pm
Marjorie C.
Dan, they will serve as co-chairs of “New Hampshire Democrats for McCain.” My guess is they have a following of Democrats in NH who are voting for McCain. Don’t be surprised if we see NY Dems for McCain and California Dems for McCain, etc. etc. Not everyone is drinking the Kool Aid. Obama’s star has been falling for quite some time, you just haven’t noticed. Hillary didn’t rack up popular vote victories in OH, TX, PA, IND, WV, KY and SD towards the end of the primaries because Obama was an overwhelming choice. Get real.
By Marjorie C. on 06/27/2008 1:32 pm
Dan Sarazen
And we will also see Republicans for Obama. It’s a non-story as it happens every election year. As for “get real” how is the continuation of the disastrous track we are on “real?” We are in huge debt because of the war (Which we’ve borrowed to finance because the President doesn’t have the guts to ask the American people to pay for it during his term). The dollar is falling because of the debt. It’s actually quiet simple. :)
By Dan Sarazen on 06/27/2008 1:38 pm
K O
Hi Dan, Actually, it’s not quite that simple. I concur that much of the current national debt is attributable to allocations to the defense budget. However, making a corollation between national debt and the value of the dollar is a stretch. Interest rates were lowered by the Fed in order to stimulate a weak economy by lowering the cost of money. Investors searching for yield found higher yields in Europe, causing the value of the Euro to increase, and the dollar, to decrease. As the Fed begins to increase short term rates to stave off inflation, the dollar with strengthen against other currencies. With all due respect, your premise is valid, but your conclusion is not.
By K O on 06/27/2008 2:51 pm
Dan Sarazen
I stand corrected. Thanks for taking the time to set me straight!
By Dan Sarazen on 06/27/2008 3:07 pm
Linda Clark
Go, Kitty, Go! I love your conviction, especially because it has “teeth”. forgive the pun, but your “right on the money”………once again!
By Linda Clark on 06/27/2008 9:15 pm
~ countrywoman ~
Reply to Marjorie C. (06/27/2008 1:32 pm)

I am struck by the contradiction of your lovely smiling face, and what flows from your fingers sometimes. I usually speed-scroll your comments, as you probably do mine, but I am going to stop this time and take exception to the “Kool Aid” crack. Contrary to your derogatory assessment, some of us have actually studied the candidates and our informed opinions differ from yours. We are pretty sure we have functioning brains, and haven’t deluded ourselves with your colorful little liquid innuendo.

Re your opinion about the trajectory of Obama’s star, I am so happy that all your wishing and dishing doesn’t make it so. Guess we will all just have to wait for November to know who needs to “get real?”
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 06/29/2008 6:22 pm