Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 06/26/2008 10:00 am

Message to All Whining Female Democrats: Hillary's Out. Get Over It, by Barbara Goldsmith

By Barbara Goldsmith
© iStock

Editor’s Note: Barbara Goldsmith is a prize-winning bestselling author and historian. She served on the Presidential Commission for the Celebration of Women in America History during President Clinton’s administration.

"Whoever is set up to be president of the United States is just set up to have his character torn off from his back in shreds and to be mauled, pummeled and covered with dirt by every filthy paper all over the country. And no woman that was not willing to be dragged through every kennel, and slopped into every dirty pail of water like an old mop, would ever consent to run as a candidate. Why, it’s an ordeal that kills a man. It killed General Harrison and it killed old Zach [Taylor]. And what sort of … a woman would it be that could stand it and come out of it without being killed?"

So commented Harriet Beecher Stowe when Victoria Woodhull announced her bid for the presidency in 1872.

The place: a distinguished publisher’s Park Avenue apartment. The date: Wednesday, June 18. The time: 8:45 AM. The occasion: a breakfast hosted by Gloria Steinem. The stated objective: to bring the Women for Barack Obama and the Hillary Clinton supporters into one cohesive group.

These emotional outbursts ... are just what male chauvinists say about woman's incapacity to coolly assess a situation.

The little blonde stood, arms akimbo, and vented her wrath: "I am a good friend of Hillary’s," she declared. "I’ve had her at my home, and I have always been there for her. I am here to tell you how angry and hurt I am and how hurt all Hillary supporters are by the sexist, disgusting way Hillary was attacked and pilloried by the media in this campaign. Until some acknowledgment of that is made, I am full of anger. I know the Democratic Party could have stopped it. I know Obama could have stopped it. But, everyone was silent and just let it happen and …"

Next up: a professor who took a full six minutes announcing her credentials and then said, "I used up my entire pension supporting Hillary. I went to 13 states and knocked on doors. I want everyone in this room to write in the name of Hillary Clinton on the ballot when they go to vote and …"

Another woman announced that she intended to launch a boycott of MSNBC. "I want all of you to sign my petition."

The chairperson of "Women for Obama," Becky Carroll, had flown in from Chicago and said she was tired. You’d be tired too with all that invective flying around the room. But Ms. Carroll couldn’t very well intervene, if catharsis was what was needed to unite Democratic women. Ms. Carroll was in a tough position – too tough to point out that Hillary Clinton had announced that her supporters should "take our energy, our passion, our strength and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama …" These emotional outbursts — and there were several more — are just what male chauvinists say about woman’s incapacity to coolly assess a situation.

Please note that so far there’s been no "I" word in my comments. The "I did this, I did that, I am hurt, I may not vote, I may vote for McCain," and so forth that have been heard lately may be what’s holding Democratic women back from fulfilling their potential to become a powerful coalition that could help guide this country back to safer ground.

581 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Little Fefe ~ There is nothing wrong with being too idealistic. It is just your dreams sparkling.
Women are hardest on themselves! I’ve never seen such a group inflict such negativity and criticism upon themselves.. it’s so very disappointment and gets sickening. I hope one day soon we can get past this point and center on the important issues.
Chrome Toe
Boy…. no KIDDING
By Chrome Toe on 06/26/2008 10:16 am
Corinne M.
Barbara, do you do everything your kids tell you to do? The Supreme Court argument you present is misleading. In case you haven’t noticed, the 5 votes that could overturn Roe are already on the bench—Kennedy, Scalia, Alito, Roberts & Thomas. (See Gonzales v. Carhart) All it will take is the right case. A Democratic president will have no effect on the make-up of the Supreme Court. The next justice likely to retire will be Justice Stevens and even if a President Obama nominates a raging liberal, it doesn’t change the fact that 5 votes to overturn Roe are already on the bench. And there is no guarantee that a President Obama will nominate a liberal to the Supreme Court. In the fall of 2005, Obama was thinking about voting to confirm John G. Roberts Jr. as chief justice. Talking with his aides, the Illinois Democrat expressed admiration for Roberts’s intellect. Besides, Obama said, if he were president he wouldn’t want his judicial nominees opposed simply on ideological grounds. Fortunately Obama’s chief of staff, Pete Rouse, reminded him that if Obama had any intention to run for president a vote for Roberts would bite him in the ass. Still liking that argument about how we need a Democrat to protect the Supreme Court? How about Obama’s backtracking on FISA? I guess he doesn’t believe in Constitutional rights after all. Doesn’t it bother you that he thinks the death penalty should be imposed for crimes where no death occurs? Or does none of that matter since, hey, it would be a Democrat in the White House! Hooray! But if you’re all for Obama, Barbara, here’s a bumper sticker for your car. Enjoy. Let’s make a deal: I’ll continue to whine and you can just STFU.
By Corinne M. on 06/26/2008 10:26 am
Blue Circle Girl
I don’t understand what is all this STFU business? And SOB …. why? How ugly is this language? Do you need to use such ugly words? It is degrading to all who read it ….. come on people.
By Blue Circle Girl on 06/26/2008 6:08 pm
Frannie Em
Blue Circle Girl I agree wholeheartedly
By Frannie Em on 06/26/2008 10:41 pm
CAT Tastic
Words are just words. It’s YOU who decides to consider them ugly. I consider them necessary to make a point, and there’s not an ugly thing about them.
By CAT Tastic on 06/29/2008 6:44 pm
Mose
I am disappointed in the women of our country, including myself. Why so many women held back in outwardly supporting Hillary (including some women of WOW), I don’t understand. My rant is less female v male and more I have no clue who Obama is and what he is capable of. There are many pointers to his extremism, and we are allowing them to be brushed off by his words (which often adjust to whatever audience he is playing to). While I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt, there are many signposts that Obama’s presidency will be radical (in what ways, time will only tell), and we are ignoring them. As much as I would like to see a change of climate in the White House, I am not interested in bringing on a tsunami of change. Ladies, I think we dropped the ball here.
By Mose on 06/26/2008 10:34 am
Lorraine Bates
I am disappointed in the women of our country, including myself. Why so many women held back in outwardly supporting Hillary (including some women of WOW), I don’t understand. My rant is less female v male and more I have no clue who Obama is and what he is capable of.” Flip it, and that’s how I feel/felt. I’m tired of being told I have to turn in my girl parts because I wasn’t a Hillary supporter. Since when do I have to vote for a woman because I’m a woman?
By Lorraine Bates on 06/26/2008 4:48 pm
Mose
I am not suggesting that because someone is a woman, she should vote for Hillary — not at all. I think women who preferred Hillary were complacent and not vocal enough. I believe each person should support whomever he or she believes in. I just think too many Hillary-ites were not outwardly supportive of her and that did not help her cause. So keep your girl parts and support Obama. He hasn’t convinced me yet, and I don’t think he will.
By Mose on 06/26/2008 5:25 pm
Star Lawrence
OK—as everyone says—here we go again. I amonly saying this once. I am not made about how shabbily the Dem party treated Hillary. Or how badly the media did. Or how crummily many on this list did. I don’t like the other candidate and won’t vote for hm. It’s HIM, not her. And I am not “getting over” squat.
By Star Lawrence on 06/26/2008 10:41 am
Star Lawrence
Typos—passion typos, I call them (above). Sorry. Again, if we are bashing McCain over what he said to Cindy—I refer you to http://www.newsweek.com/id/142650 to learn more about her, our fellow woman.
By Star Lawrence on 06/26/2008 10:46 am
Linda Clark
Aahhhhh! Star………the voice of reason and resources! heehee
By Linda Clark on 06/26/2008 5:52 pm
Frannie Em
Star, THanks for the link, I realized when I was there that I went to school with Cindy McCain. I didn’t know her, but I saw her at times. I think she was a cheerleader at one time, and practiced on the track where I ran. I’d forgotten she went to USC.
By Frannie Em on 06/26/2008 11:28 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
This is America. You can vote for or against anyone who is on the ballot. If you are lucky, the ballots will get counted.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 06/30/2008 7:33 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Tomorrow Hillary and Obama will be campaigning together. I am looking forward to seeing them unite for the good of the party and the election. This is the American political process. But to give up my pension for any candidate??….sorry but too extreme for my taste.
By Brooklyn Gal on 06/26/2008 10:49 am