Politics | 03/03/2009 8:10 am
GOP Sen. Corker Calls AIG Bailout 'Tar Baby'

Sen. Bob Corker used some questionable language while discussing failing insurance giant AIG. The government has pumped AIG full of cash — yet they still posted a $61 billion loss yesterday.
Obviously many lawmakers are angry over the Treasury’s insistence that they must prop up AIG, but Corker’s phrasing has some people scratching their heads. Said the Tennessee Republican to Politico: "It’s a tar baby. It’s not going to go away.”
"Tar baby," of course, can refer to a "sticky situation," but it has also been used as a pejorative term for African Americans. We can’t be sure what Corker meant when he used the term. He did, however, continue to explain his position:
Economists estimated AIG may need another $60 billion to survive. The company, meanwhile, says they used their original bailout to pay off bad debts. A new handout would help them keep things together until they can sell off profitable businesses. CEO Edward Liddy also insists American taxpayers will be paid back once the markets settle. Either then or when hell freezes over. Whichever comes first …This amount of money that’s going into AIG, there is no upside now. This is all just like gone money.
The TARP was sold in that we were going to use the $700 billion to buy things of value and the American taxpayer was actually going to receive that money back. Putting TARP money into AIG is an absolute departure from the whole notion of what TARP was set up to do.























18 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
"This amount of money that’s going into AIG, there is no upside now. This is all just like gone money."
Can’t figure out where the money went. The banks are trying to correct so many wrong things. This economy debt were in is deep and wide. Yes the banks are going to need more money. Banks may have to change the way they do things or we may see some improvements. Still I don’t think we’ll get out of this mess quickly.
I loved Uncle Remus as a kid. But this is no time to invoke his wisdom. And the metaphor is not altogether apt. It’d be great if a piece of the squandered wealth got stuck to the taxpayer with each injection, and by propping up these institutions, we’re not exactly punching them in the nose. Some reference to quicksand or pete bogs might have been more illustrative of Senator Corker’s point of view, but any way you look at, it seems to be money down the drain.
There may still be room to see the TARP as a sound speculative investment, especially given the international consequences of the alternative. Only time will tell.
Oh, I hear it, rocky. Just trying to elevate the discussion a bit…or at least keep an inflammatory little idiot from sparking a bonfire.
Y’gotta wonder how many people in Tennessee are proud of their representative.
Is saving AIG even possible? We might be better off letting them fail. I argue this point in my most recent post on my blog: http://www.ricoexplainsitall.com/politcs-economy/2009/3/4/the-irrational…
Regardless of what Mr. Corker thinks, it is NOT alright to air his negative, slurs in public. Excuse me… isn’t he a southerner? And, don’tcha just betcha he knows exactly what the words mean? And, I hope someone will nail him for it, as well.
If most of us are aware of the terminology, don’tcha just s’pose it is exactly how he intended the words to come out?
Jerk-0ff!