Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 03/03/2009 8:10 am

GOP Sen. Corker Calls AIG Bailout 'Tar Baby'

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Getty Images

Sen. Bob Corker used some questionable language while discussing failing insurance giant AIG. The government has pumped AIG full of cash — yet they still posted a $61 billion loss yesterday.

Obviously many lawmakers are angry over the Treasury’s insistence that they must prop up AIG, but Corker’s phrasing has some people scratching their heads. Said the Tennessee Republican to Politico: "It’s a tar baby. It’s not going to go away.”

"Tar baby," of course, can refer to a "sticky situation," but it has also been used as a pejorative term for African Americans. We can’t be sure what Corker meant when he used the term. He did, however, continue to explain his position:

This amount of money that’s going into AIG, there is no upside now. This is all just like gone money.

The TARP was sold in that we were going to use the $700 billion to buy things of value and the American taxpayer was actually going to receive that money back. Putting TARP money into AIG is an absolute departure from the whole notion of what TARP was set up to do.

Economists estimated AIG may need another $60 billion to survive. The company, meanwhile, says they used their original bailout to pay off bad debts. A new handout would help them keep things together until they can sell off profitable businesses. CEO Edward Liddy also insists American taxpayers will be paid back once the markets settle. Either then or when hell freezes over. Whichever comes first …

18 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Beth Hereth
At this point we are just "throwing pearls before swine".  Let them (not just AIG, but all banks/companies in trouble) fail, because our portfolios are worth now zero anyway.  The fittest and strongest (banks/companies) will survive on their own and new better banks/companies will emerge (if they have the right incentives).
By Beth Hereth on 03/03/2009 8:25 am
f p
RAther tacky of the man to say the least
By f p on 03/03/2009 8:28 am
Al ias
"tacky’ now THAT is funny - I wonder if the writer would have played the race card if Francis Rice had said it or maybe Michael Steele ?  probably….
By Al ias on 03/03/2009 8:50 am
f p
Tacky no matter who said it—-sometimes I think the south should have won the Civil War and we’d be done with it permanently.
By f p on 03/03/2009 12:55 pm
Al ias
I am a decendent of officers who fought in both the revolution and with the 2nd North Carolina Mounted Infantry (Loyalist) during the War of the Rebellion - I am also an officer in the United States Army - I hope your comment about the traitorous states winning the War of the Rebellion was a joke…
By Al ias on 03/05/2009 2:56 pm
Belinda Joy
You know what? I think Republican Tennessee Sen. Corker has been waiting 57 years for the opportunity to use the term “tar baby” in a public forum in a context that he would be able to control the narrative. Well, bully for you Sen. Corker…..you finally got what you wanted.
By Belinda Joy on 03/03/2009 9:53 am
Grande Camper

"This amount of money that’s going into AIG, there is no upside now. This is all just like gone money."

Can’t figure out where the money went.  The banks are trying to correct so many wrong things.  This economy debt were in is deep and wide. Yes the banks are going to need more money.  Banks may have to change the way they do things or we may see some improvements.  Still I don’t think we’ll get out of this mess quickly.

By Grande Camper on 03/03/2009 10:35 am
rocky rocky
As I understand it, AIG has a great international presence, and saving them is a matter of helping to save the other countries/peoples who are tied to this organization. (I wonder of those other countries are contributing to the "bail out" of this organization as well.) Gosh, I was dead set against President Obama doing any of this, but now that he is committed to righting all done wrongs, then he should get on with it and make sure whatever he does is effective!  ~~~ As far as Sen Corker is concerned, I strongly suspect he knows exactly why he chose those words. I believe that the underlying disrespect for the President of the United States is intentional and meant to encourage the same in as many others as possible. I find him and his ilk despicable and loathsome … and fear only that such casual disloyalty to our Flag, our Constitution, and other of our highest ideals will come back to bite us all in the end. He should be brought to the front of Congress and the Senate to denounce his careless and treasonous words and apologize.
By rocky rocky on 03/03/2009 11:15 am
Ms. Dee

I loved Uncle Remus as a kid.  But this is no time to invoke his wisdom.  And the metaphor is not altogether apt.  It’d be great if a piece of the squandered wealth got stuck to the taxpayer with each injection, and by propping up these institutions, we’re not exactly punching them in the nose.  Some reference to quicksand or pete bogs might have been more illustrative of Senator Corker’s point of view, but any way you look at, it seems to be money down the drain.

There may still be room to see the TARP as a sound speculative investment, especially given the international consequences of the alternative.  Only time will tell.

By Ms. Dee on 03/03/2009 11:27 am
rocky rocky
Ms Dee — I implore you not to let the standard definition of that expression mislead you. No one with the least bit of sensitivity or good will would have used that archaic term. I cringe at the sneer and snicker I hear in that man’s words. 
By rocky rocky on 03/03/2009 6:40 pm
Ms. Dee

Oh, I hear it, rocky.  Just trying to elevate the discussion a bit…or at least keep an inflammatory little idiot from sparking a bonfire.

Y’gotta wonder how many people in Tennessee are proud of their representative.

By Ms. Dee on 03/03/2009 9:13 pm
Al ias
yep, has no place, just like "lipstick on a pig" -
By Al ias on 03/05/2009 3:09 pm
rico bernard

Is saving AIG even possible? We might be better off letting them fail.  I argue this point in my most recent post on my blog:  http://www.ricoexplainsitall.com/politcs-economy/2009/3/4/the-irrational…

 

 

By rico bernard on 03/03/2009 9:51 pm
Ro H

Regardless of what Mr. Corker thinks, it is NOT alright to air his negative, slurs in public.  Excuse me… isn’t he a southerner?  And, don’tcha just betcha he knows exactly what the words mean?  And, I hope someone will nail him for it, as well.

If most of us are aware of the terminology, don’tcha just s’pose it is exactly how he intended the words to come out?

Jerk-0ff!

By Ro H on 03/04/2009 5:54 am
Karen R
Mr. Corker seems to have forgotten that Br’er Rabbit escaped despite tangling with the tar baby Br’er Fox and Br’er Bear left to tempt him.
By Karen R on 03/13/2009 9:55 am