Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Cynthia McFadden | 06/04/2008 11:36 am

Hillary Clinton Exhausted and in Mourning

Editor’s Note: A report from our newest wOwer (soon to be officially announced) from the field.

He did it. He won. Barack Obama hit the magic number and Hillary Clinton did not — can not — now. But so far she hasn’t been able to bring herself to say so. One can only imagine what it feels like to have worked this hard for this long and to come to the end; to be surrounded by the faithful who have pinned their hopes and dreams on you — contributing time, money and heart to make it happen and then, gone. I know a lot of the people in the center of Clinton’s historic run for the White House and, this morning, they sound dazed. Then there are the 17 to 18 million people (depends on whether and how you count Florida and Michigan voters) who went to the polls and said they wanted her to be the next president of these United States.

Insiders say that Clinton herself is both exhausted and uncertain how she wants to proceed. She has told some close to her that the pressure on her is intense and that she has "earned" a moment of reflection before deciding whether to quit the race and how. Those arguing that she should stay in the race seem to have the slimmest of points this morning. Does challenging the way the Michigan delegation was seated really seem to have any legs at this point? I don’t think so. The party is moving on with Obama to the general election. In the hours to come — I would argue by Friday at the latest — she will have no choice but to congratulate him as the winner or seem terribly ungracious and divisive.

So why didn’t she do it last night? She probably should have. But she is exhausted. She is in mourning. She doesn’t want to make a mistake and there is much to consider. Not the least of which is money. Clinton has loaned her campaign $11.4 million dollars. No doubt she’d like to see some of that money again. What is the party — what is Obama willing to do to help her with this? It seems Obama is willing to help her on this front. He has asked her to meet with him. But so far she seems reluctant. They most likely saw each other today when both addressed AIPAC in Washington. But don’t look for any announcement from that.

Perhaps it is the other looming question she needs more time to consider: Does she want to be Obama’s vice president? Signals on this score are mixed. Many believe the duo would be better equipped to beat McCain in the fall, but most political analysts say nobody ever won (or lost) the presidency over his pick of vice president. And that is probably true. From Obama’s point of view there is also the "Bill" factor. It is one thing to have Hillary Clinton as your V.P. It is another to have a former president as her spouse. As Princess Diana once famously said about her marriage, "There were three of us in this marriage and it was rather crowded in there." You get the point.

Over the past year and a half I have interviewed Hillary Clinton five times, in depth, on the campaign trail — first in September of 2006 as she campaigned for re-election to her Senate seat and then from Iowa, Little Rock, Ohio and last month in Indiana.

Our conversations have been wide-ranging and extensive. And during the course of this time I feel I have had a chance to see Hillary Clinton in a unique way — in various situations, including alone with the cameras off. It gave me a more complex portrait of her, a woman who is disciplined, vulnerable, suspicious, passionate, reflective, funny and wise; someone you’d like to be able to take your shoes off with and have a nice long chat.

122 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Chips AHoey
this is a great analysis - thank you - no need to comment further - you said it all!
By Chips AHoey on 06/04/2008 11:45 am
Taylor Hall
And here we go again giving the 2nd runner up all of the play she and the media strongly believes she deserves. McFadden has admitted something I said in an earlier post…the media has no interest in presenting a story on a subject matter they have not and never wil believe in…cover blacks and other minorities in news stories. I wonder how many times McFadden has interviewed Obama? Has she worked on her exclusive with the wife of our newly elected Presidential candidate? Mrs. Obama is part of history just as her husband and HC are. I challenge you to get that story Cynthia McFadden.
By Taylor Hall on 06/06/2008 1:20 pm
~ countrywoman ~
Reply to Taylor Hall - 6/6/2008 1:20 PM Yours is not the only voice making this request, and puzzling over why we need to do so. Sure hope someone is listening?
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 06/06/2008 3:18 pm
Dona Howlett
I feel very sad that Hillary will not be our first woman President. I had hoped in my lifetime…….????? Now I think it is the time to do as our Forfathers did. George Washington got the largest amount of votes…..John Adams came in second…..Walla! President and Vice President chosen by the people. The Democrats have got to do what ever is necessary to keep the Republicans out of the White House. It will take our Country years to recover from the devastation of George Bush and his cronies.
By Dona Howlett on 06/04/2008 11:57 am
Frank Peterson
Dona: there is still time for her to be president—she young and she has staying power. We can only wait and see. And have patience.
By Frank Peterson on 06/04/2008 12:27 pm
doll lady
Hmmmmmmmmmmm…I prefer she keep her shoes on after all of the running around she has done.
By doll lady on 06/04/2008 11:58 am
Buh- Bye
It isn’t “tempting” to blame the press. It’s ACCURATE to blame the press.
By Buh- Bye on 06/04/2008 12:07 pm
Marjorie C.
My Alias “It isn’t “tempting” to blame the press. It’s ACCURATE to blame the press.” Indeed. Those ugly photos of her run time and time again said it all. The media chose Obama early on and rarely did any of the famous superdelegates come to her defense… until it was safely too late. Eighteen million people saw through it and eighteen million did not. So there it is. The superdelegates have made their choice and we have it.
By Marjorie C. on 06/04/2008 12:33 pm
mary lou s
the press gave obama a pass. they excoriated everything hillary clinton stood for. and now we stand: obama probably selected, hillary probably excoriated. if the press finds something on obama worthy of note, will they now display it? what will the delegates do?
By mary lou s on 06/04/2008 8:16 pm
Marjorie C.
mary lou, The Republicans will publish anything they find, but… will they wait until September or October to put it out there. That has been the risk all along. That is why Hillary felt she was more electable — her baggage has been checked over and over. “…if the press finds something on obama worthy of note, will they now display it? what will the delegates do?” Can you imagine Pelosi admitting she made a bad choice? Or the so many others who were gung-ho for Obama? I think they’d let the Democratic Party go down in flames, first. Maybe someone else has a different opinion, but it’s an interesting premise.
By Marjorie C. on 06/05/2008 8:14 am
Karl Clark
Mary Lou, the press did not give Obama a free pass. I guess you fail to remember how the press gave the nomination to Hillary from the very beginning. Once the American people began to speak and a real race insued, and Hillary - along with others - vetted in the press, did she and others lambasted the press. No one got a pass from the press. No one.
By Karl Clark on 06/08/2008 6:40 pm
Willow K
I think you’re giving the media too much credit. Obama won due to his grass-roots organization and charisma, not because of media bias.
By Willow K on 06/04/2008 12:40 pm
Marjorie C.
Willow, speaking for myself I think the media deserves the full measure of credit for their slanted views. However, I will give credit to Obama’s grass-roots organization (you see he’s just an old-time Chicago-type politician — something some of us knew all along). Charisma, he has. But then again, to some Hitler had charisma. I never could see it myself.
By Marjorie C. on 06/04/2008 1:07 pm
Lorraine Bates
Marjorie - am I smoking crack, or did you just compare Obama to HITLER??? BTW - and “old time Chicago politician” relied on his cronies….like someone in a pantsuit did with superdelegates….
By Lorraine Bates on 06/04/2008 1:38 pm
Marjorie C.
Lorraine: “am I smoking crack, or did you just compare Obama to HITLER???” No, no, no. Let me clarify. Please. The only point I was trying to make is that charisma can be a double-edged sword. A gift used for good or evil. On my worst day, I do not believe that Obama is evil. He is charismatic and sweet and charming. A good politician. Hillary is the same. FDR was wonderful. And on and on and on. But occasionally a Mr. H. comes along and changes the whole world and the meaning of charisma.
By Marjorie C. on 06/04/2008 3:41 pm