Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Cynthia McFadden | 06/04/2008 11:36 am

Hillary Clinton Exhausted and in Mourning

Editor’s Note: A report from our newest wOwer (soon to be officially announced) from the field.

He did it. He won. Barack Obama hit the magic number and Hillary Clinton did not — can not — now. But so far she hasn’t been able to bring herself to say so. One can only imagine what it feels like to have worked this hard for this long and to come to the end; to be surrounded by the faithful who have pinned their hopes and dreams on you — contributing time, money and heart to make it happen and then, gone. I know a lot of the people in the center of Clinton’s historic run for the White House and, this morning, they sound dazed. Then there are the 17 to 18 million people (depends on whether and how you count Florida and Michigan voters) who went to the polls and said they wanted her to be the next president of these United States.

Insiders say that Clinton herself is both exhausted and uncertain how she wants to proceed. She has told some close to her that the pressure on her is intense and that she has "earned" a moment of reflection before deciding whether to quit the race and how. Those arguing that she should stay in the race seem to have the slimmest of points this morning. Does challenging the way the Michigan delegation was seated really seem to have any legs at this point? I don’t think so. The party is moving on with Obama to the general election. In the hours to come — I would argue by Friday at the latest — she will have no choice but to congratulate him as the winner or seem terribly ungracious and divisive.

So why didn’t she do it last night? She probably should have. But she is exhausted. She is in mourning. She doesn’t want to make a mistake and there is much to consider. Not the least of which is money. Clinton has loaned her campaign $11.4 million dollars. No doubt she’d like to see some of that money again. What is the party — what is Obama willing to do to help her with this? It seems Obama is willing to help her on this front. He has asked her to meet with him. But so far she seems reluctant. They most likely saw each other today when both addressed AIPAC in Washington. But don’t look for any announcement from that.

Perhaps it is the other looming question she needs more time to consider: Does she want to be Obama’s vice president? Signals on this score are mixed. Many believe the duo would be better equipped to beat McCain in the fall, but most political analysts say nobody ever won (or lost) the presidency over his pick of vice president. And that is probably true. From Obama’s point of view there is also the "Bill" factor. It is one thing to have Hillary Clinton as your V.P. It is another to have a former president as her spouse. As Princess Diana once famously said about her marriage, "There were three of us in this marriage and it was rather crowded in there." You get the point.

Over the past year and a half I have interviewed Hillary Clinton five times, in depth, on the campaign trail — first in September of 2006 as she campaigned for re-election to her Senate seat and then from Iowa, Little Rock, Ohio and last month in Indiana.

Our conversations have been wide-ranging and extensive. And during the course of this time I feel I have had a chance to see Hillary Clinton in a unique way — in various situations, including alone with the cameras off. It gave me a more complex portrait of her, a woman who is disciplined, vulnerable, suspicious, passionate, reflective, funny and wise; someone you’d like to be able to take your shoes off with and have a nice long chat.

122 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

rocky rocky
You did it again. Amazing.
By rocky rocky on 06/04/2008 5:16 pm
rocky rocky
Second thought: I think I can see your point. Sen. Obama hasn’t been around for very long, not nearly as long as Sens. Clinton and McCain. And I see that it can concern some that Sen. Obama seems to be sweeping people off their feet; they worry that he may be sweeping people off their reason as well. Is that something like what you meant?
By rocky rocky on 06/04/2008 6:06 pm
Renata
…yes, he KNOWS how to use the Internet, how to MANAGE a nationwide ground game to enroll millions of NEW voters to get active in civic engagement and PAYS HIS BILLS. He is FOR something instead of against and believes in E pluribis unum. Terrible!
By Renata on 06/04/2008 7:52 pm
rocky rocky
Renata, do you think Sen. Clinton’s folks will need some time to come around? I was surprised to see Majorie’s comparison to say the least, but if she can open her mind to who Sen. Obama is, maybe she can make a decision as a voter that is at least not based on fear. Frankly, I did not believe Sen. Obama either, until I talked to people who know him. They told me “he’s the real thing.” It wasn’t until then that I really started listening, went to his website to read his position papers, and finally borrowed his books from the library. And it wasn’t long before I jumped on the bandwagon, too. I just hoped to encourage Marjorie and others who “fear” his “charisma” to do the same.
By rocky rocky on 06/04/2008 9:27 pm
Marjorie C.
Anne, I own the first book Obama wrote. My daughter gave it to me as a Christmas gift several years ago. I read it and found it interesting. I don’t hate Obama, but I see a charlatan where you see a hero. However, it’s the the Rev. Wright thing that clinched it for me. How could Obama expose his children to that environment? How could he listen to it for twenty years? Why would you want to wrap yourself up in that kind of hate? Particularly when your mother was white. It all kind of left a bad taste in my mouth which will probably not go away.
By Marjorie C. on 06/05/2008 8:30 am
Karl Clark
Marjorie C: You should be ashamed. First you compared Obama to Hitler. Then you sullied Obama’s character to that of a church’s pastor. There is so much here that I should respond to, but I won’t. However allow me to say this. Obama won the nomination fair and square. He did not receive a free ride. I guess you are not aware that one of Bill Clinton’s pastor was recently jailed for child molestation. The press did not report that on a daily basis. Also, you would not have known so much about Rev Wright if the media and the internet did not show it over and over again. I understand your disappointment because Hillary lost. But look at the real reason for her lost. She listened to a bunch of hardnosed advisors giving her bad advise. And leave Obama’s children out of it. You should know to never comment on a family’s member or religion.
By Karl Clark on 06/08/2008 6:51 pm
rocky rocky
Hi Marjorie — First, I’m “anne.” I changed my Wow name to Rocky. (another story) I want to thank you for “corresponding.” I do so prefer a give and take on these topics. Just talking at folks is kind of boring at times. Now, to the subject: It’s so interesting that we see Sen Obama in such different ways — charlatan vs hero. I’m guessing that it has less to do with the “truth” than it has to do with our own life experiences. After all, neither of us knows him and therefore must surmise, guess, parse … Life experiences: For example, the Rev. Wright thing was unfortunate, I agree. But I never reacted the way most people seem to have. That is, I was not horrified. The “d___ America” business was said in the days after September 11, 2001, when everyone was looking through a glass darkly (me, too). I didn’t think he spoke like that every Sunday; the thought never occurred to me. How could he be the pastor of a mainstream Christian church with many hundreds of parishioners if he had? Of course, I would fully expect to see/hear the same kind of hyperbole and dramatic presentation if I were ever to hear one of his sermons. But that’s style, not substance. One can like that or not to no one’s detriment. (Of course, it never would happen in the Catholic church of my girlhood or the Unitarian fellowship I went to later in life — lots of yawns in those places.) I’m not black so I can’t really address “that kind of hate.” Again, though, I don’t think of it as “hate,” but instead as a reaction to racism. Very different. For example, if a rapist were to say to the woman he raped many years ago, “Hey, it’s in the past. Get over it,” it would take an army to stop that woman from killing him. Doesn’t mean she hates, I would imagine; it means she’s enraged. Don’t you think? With respect — Rocky (anne)
By rocky rocky on 06/11/2008 9:49 pm
sibelle daubigne
Marjorie I am late in the conversation, just to say, think deeply a charlatan is a hero and a hero is a charlatan! Just different culture, time and space, that is what keeps conversations going! Obama is a charlatan and a hero! lol just politics!
By sibelle daubigne on 06/14/2008 8:30 am
Alessan O
The campaign staff knew how to handle the internet, they were the same people who ran the Kerry campaign they had the internet also, the participation was less, but by interacting with Facebook and MySpace, more of the youth got involved, and every one knows he bused in college children from out of state in Iowa, that’s how he won Iowa. Slick, slick, a very slick politican.
By Alessan O on 06/04/2008 11:08 pm
Marjorie C.
anne, “And I see that it can concern some that Sen. Obama seems to be sweeping people off their feet; they worry that he may be sweeping people off their reason as well. Is that something like what you meant?” Exactly. However, I do believe people came to their senses and Hillary started to win the popular votes in big states like Texas, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and then small states like KY, WV and SD. Voters took a step back. The Democratic Party big whigs made the final choice. Now this is what we’re left with: a old man who in on the verge of being too old to govern or a young man with no diplomatic experience. Flip a coin and pray for America.
By Marjorie C. on 06/05/2008 8:45 am
Karl Clark
Wow! Marjorie C. You really possess hard feelings for Obama. Right now he’s 46. Check this out: Age of Presidents when taking the office: 11 James Polk 49 14 Frankling Pierce 48 - Barbara Bush is a decendent 18 Ulysses S Grant 46 20 James Garfield 49 22 Grover Cleveland 47 26 Theodore Roosevelt 42 36 John F Kennedy 43 42 Bill Clinton 46 - No Foriegn or Diplomatic experience Enough said!
By Karl Clark on 06/08/2008 7:21 pm
Buh- Bye
Recently 60 Minutes did a segment on the Millenials generation… born between 1980 and 1995… who want (in 60 Minutes words) “to roll into work with their iPods and flip flops around noon, but still be CEO by Friday.” The Millenials are overwhelmingly the primary supporters of Barack Obama and the reason why a relatively inexperienced, newbie Senator is now Democratic nominee for leader of the free world. How things will play out in the days ahead should be very interesting. The documentary StartUp Dot Com on this phenomena of ambitious newbies launching a multimillion dollar enterprise based on big PR and minimal business experience was a cautionary tale. Punchy slogans and aggressive PR no doubt can cause a stir, but it doesn’t get job one done. PR bubbles burst when there is a cocksure suit behind the hype. To view the 60 Minutes Video Report on Millenials click here: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/08/60minutes/main3475200.shtml To view the trailer for Startup.com click here: http://www.blockbuster.com/browse/catalog/movie/trailer/185315
By Buh- Bye on 06/05/2008 2:42 pm
Marjorie C.
I saw the 60-Minute segment and smiled because I know some kids like that. Children of successfull baby-boomers, they are professional students. Nice kids. These kids could send Obama $100 a week of Daddy’s money for as long as he needed it. And probably did. I kind of figured this was Obama’s constituency. No harm. As for the trailer you pointed me to, that is more scary. When the bubble on those kind of operations burst it splatters all over the place, an inkling of which is the current foreclosure crisis and the major financial institution we recently had to bail out to keep the economy afloat. Serious enough and you have 1929 all over again. Yup, ya gotta keep a wary eye out for the fox in the tailored suit who wants so badly to guard the chicken coop. Gotta know who he is and what he’s up to.
By Marjorie C. on 06/05/2008 5:21 pm
Lorraine Bates
Thank you for clarifying. I’ll come down off the ceiling now! I don’t think the meaning of charisma is changed by someone evil, but it definitely takes charisma to do either good on a tremendous scale, or evil on a tremendous scale.
By Lorraine Bates on 06/05/2008 4:29 pm
~ countrywoman ~
Marjorie C. - 6/4/2008 1:07 PM I posted something in another thread about your voice of reason, I take it back.
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 06/04/2008 3:32 pm