Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Cynthia McFadden | 06/04/2008 11:36 am

Hillary Clinton Exhausted and in Mourning

Editor’s Note: A report from our newest wOwer (soon to be officially announced) from the field.

He did it. He won. Barack Obama hit the magic number and Hillary Clinton did not — can not — now. But so far she hasn’t been able to bring herself to say so. One can only imagine what it feels like to have worked this hard for this long and to come to the end; to be surrounded by the faithful who have pinned their hopes and dreams on you — contributing time, money and heart to make it happen and then, gone. I know a lot of the people in the center of Clinton’s historic run for the White House and, this morning, they sound dazed. Then there are the 17 to 18 million people (depends on whether and how you count Florida and Michigan voters) who went to the polls and said they wanted her to be the next president of these United States.

Insiders say that Clinton herself is both exhausted and uncertain how she wants to proceed. She has told some close to her that the pressure on her is intense and that she has "earned" a moment of reflection before deciding whether to quit the race and how. Those arguing that she should stay in the race seem to have the slimmest of points this morning. Does challenging the way the Michigan delegation was seated really seem to have any legs at this point? I don’t think so. The party is moving on with Obama to the general election. In the hours to come — I would argue by Friday at the latest — she will have no choice but to congratulate him as the winner or seem terribly ungracious and divisive.

So why didn’t she do it last night? She probably should have. But she is exhausted. She is in mourning. She doesn’t want to make a mistake and there is much to consider. Not the least of which is money. Clinton has loaned her campaign $11.4 million dollars. No doubt she’d like to see some of that money again. What is the party — what is Obama willing to do to help her with this? It seems Obama is willing to help her on this front. He has asked her to meet with him. But so far she seems reluctant. They most likely saw each other today when both addressed AIPAC in Washington. But don’t look for any announcement from that.

Perhaps it is the other looming question she needs more time to consider: Does she want to be Obama’s vice president? Signals on this score are mixed. Many believe the duo would be better equipped to beat McCain in the fall, but most political analysts say nobody ever won (or lost) the presidency over his pick of vice president. And that is probably true. From Obama’s point of view there is also the "Bill" factor. It is one thing to have Hillary Clinton as your V.P. It is another to have a former president as her spouse. As Princess Diana once famously said about her marriage, "There were three of us in this marriage and it was rather crowded in there." You get the point.

Over the past year and a half I have interviewed Hillary Clinton five times, in depth, on the campaign trail — first in September of 2006 as she campaigned for re-election to her Senate seat and then from Iowa, Little Rock, Ohio and last month in Indiana.

Our conversations have been wide-ranging and extensive. And during the course of this time I feel I have had a chance to see Hillary Clinton in a unique way — in various situations, including alone with the cameras off. It gave me a more complex portrait of her, a woman who is disciplined, vulnerable, suspicious, passionate, reflective, funny and wise; someone you’d like to be able to take your shoes off with and have a nice long chat.

122 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Linda Mason
I just want to respond to the many comments about the perceived journalistic bias in favor of one candidate or the other. Personally, I believe that Senator Clinton got the better of the deal, but let’s be honest and admit that our perceptions are, themselves, biased. But I would like to add a point that I have not seen elsewhere, and which is directed to most who posted on this subject, not just Carol L. Media bias cannot be judged based on one-on-one comparisons, such as how a single outlet treats one story (e.g., photo coverage of the PA. Primary) on a single day. You can only assess bias — or lack thereof — by viewing coverage over time. Furthermore, the real issue is not whether the media outlet or commentator is tough on a candidate (one function of press scrutiny is to demonstrate a candidate’s ability to withstand the spotlight of the White House), but whether it is equally tough on all candidates. And in our society the press is free to be biased, and it is up to us to perceive those biases and to judge the press’s credibility accordingly. Well, I have gone on too long, and notwithstanding everything I just said, I firmly believe in the public’s right to call a media outlet and complain about their treatment of a story if they want. I believe that the real legacy of these two historic campaigns is the level of engagement that we see in the supporters of Senators Obama and Clinton, and it is wonderful.
By Linda Mason on 06/05/2008 10:55 am
Maggi D
How ever Hillary ends this she will have a well deserved place in history. She fought hard and lost. Both Hillary and Obama have taken slams from the media and still stood tall. I supported Obama from the first time I heard him speak but I still have great admiration for Hillary.
By Maggi D on 06/05/2008 12:04 am
Maggi D
By the way welcome to this melting pot of ideas and comments. Sounds like your voice will be a great addition.
By Maggi D on 06/05/2008 12:08 am
mary lou s
since everybody is worried about hillary conceding, she will do it on saturday.
By mary lou s on 06/05/2008 5:27 am
Buh- Bye
Who the heck is advising her to lay down like this? She should run as an Independent. I truly believe she would win.
By Buh- Bye on 06/05/2008 11:28 am
Marjorie C.
My Alias, The way I understand it, her closest Democratic friends, SDs no doubt, gathered around to convince her to save (sacrifice herself for) the party. She’s probably confused and stunned at the host of turncoats she counted as friends — the SDs who swarmed to endorse Obama so he’d reach the 2118 delegates early on Tuesday. After all, he had a victory party planned. For her to run as an Independent, she’d have to get started immediately to organize. She has no money. By the time she qualified for federal funds, the momentum might be gone. I sincerely hope all the Clintons just walk away from the whole mess. Retire. Maybe organize a third party. This country really needs an alternative to what we have. Obama will not make changes in the Democratic Party, he will only create turmoil.
By Marjorie C. on 06/05/2008 12:41 pm
Barbara
This is a very thoughtful piece and I appreciate the insights into Hillary Clinton. Then reading the string of comments I wonder how open minded many people are. It is very interesting to reflect that there are many women who feel Hillary Clinton was denied the nomination because she is a woman…and don’t see anything remarkable in the fact that it is a person of color who they feel had the press and “the machine” behind him. Perhaps, just perhaps, people are truly looking at other qualities than gender and race at this point. Looking at the total package. The leadership style, the thoughtfulness, the openness. And judging on those qualities. Isn’t that a wonderful place to be in. Where we might finally be deciding based on the content of character rather than on race and gender?
By Barbara on 06/05/2008 6:48 am
Anne B.
Barbara - was relieved to see your thoughts at the end of the comments when I checked in this morning! Not only do I agree and appreciate with what you wrote (!)…… I am so happy to see an intelligent and kind response. The sniping in the earlier comments is unfortunate and unneccesary….. we need to be our better selves and discuss without rudeness and attacking others. I do believe that we are all here to learn and share and grow.
By Anne B. on 06/05/2008 7:02 am
Ulla
Anne - I second this - seem to be agreeing much with you today (see another thread at QOTD) or I just like your sunflower … Anyway, after trying a compassionate comment earlier in this thread I was astonished how it went on … these topics - the Clintons (!), the media, sexism etc. - just bring out some really ‘passionate’ commentary …
By Ulla on 06/05/2008 8:13 am
Randa P
This is an excellent piece about HC. It feels genuine and personal. Please write more.
By Randa P on 06/05/2008 8:35 am
Chrome Toe
Really well written piece and one I agree with whole heartedly. Clinton’s campaigning had some real flaws. When she first announced I was ready to be swayed into supporting her. I had to swayed as I’d always felt she was to strong of a charachter, to much baggage, to devisive in her persona to get elected. I had a belief from the outset that were she to win we’d end up wiht another republican president. But I WANTED to support her. So I watched and listened to everything. And she irritated the hell out of me. instead of answering direct questions every other word out of her mouth in the beginning was how the republicans are demons and screwed up our country. I had to actually turn her off at one point it was so annoying. Then… like the piece stated.. the more support Obama got, the more shrill and whiny she appeared (for awhile), which also annoyed me. She didn’t find herself for a long time. By that time I also felt the country had decided she couldn’t beat McCain. I mean come on… I’m a 44 year old woman that’s never voted republican in my life. I’m pro choice, anti war, pro gay marriage… all the things that should have meant I would support Hillary out of the gate and I was never there and neither were my same thinking girlfriends. She was the almost candidate as far as I was concerned from day one.
By Chrome Toe on 06/05/2008 9:13 am
K O
Welcome, Cynthia, and thank you for giving words to a feeling I’ve had since the primaries wound down. I am deeply, deeply saddened over this loss. Seeing this feeling so eloquently stated has helped lift my mood. I even feel that I’m regaining my sense of humor…e.g., Renata works for McCain and is a surreptitious web plant, and Mark Klein is an inmate with access to a computer. Ah, to laugh again. Thanks so very much.
By K O on 06/05/2008 9:37 am
Buh- Bye
Is that true? Creepy.
By Buh- Bye on 06/05/2008 11:05 am
K O
No, it’s not technically true, but it IS the picture I have of them in my head. (smile)
By K O on 06/05/2008 12:13 pm
Susan B
Renata, you’ve been served.
By Susan B on 06/05/2008 11:05 am