Politics | 02/23/2009 9:30 am
Clinton's Diplomatic Style: Breath of Fresh Air or Lightning Rod?

Hillary Clinton isn’t exactly one for beating around the bush.
Last week, she made headlines for speaking publicly about the successor to rogue North Korea leader Kim Jung-il. With tongues wagging, Clinton kept a level head, saying, "I think that to worry about something which is so self-evident is an
impediment to clear thinking … And I don’t think it should be viewed as
particularly extraordinary that someone in my position would say what’s
obvious."
Well, the secretary of state displayed more of that diplomatic style throughout the rest of her Asia trip last week — including touching on topics like sanctions against the junta in Burma, and human rights, particularly those of women, in China.
"In no society are women treated equally yet," she told a group of female academics and other leaders in Beijing. "I believe strongly that if women are not full participants in society, the society does not advance the way that it could. And if women are denied their rights, it affects children, families and the entire social structure."
Speaking so openly — and so publicly — about these latter topics are typically taboo for American officials, but it may be a sign of more to come.
Clinton’s willingness to speak frankly — combined with an extensive effort to get beyond ministerial meetings in order to hold town hall meetings and conduct local television interviews in the countries she visits - suggests she will put a distinctive personal stamp on the Obama administration’s foreign policy. What is emerging is something less rigid, less cautious and more open.
We think Clinton is a breath of fresh air, and no time can be wasted giving offending countries a verbal pass just to avoid raising a ruckus.
Meanwhile, Clinton on Sunday asked the Chinese to continue their economic support for the United States, despite the fact that the economy there has nearly ground to a halt. "We are truly going to rise and fall together," she said, urging China — which is financing part of our $787 billion stimulus package — to continue buying U.S. Treasury bonds. "We are in the same boat and, thankfully, we are rowing in the same direction."























32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Which Bush?
LoLoLoLoLoLoLoLo
China’s economy has virtually ground to a stop. How are they going to support our debt if they are in so much trouble?
I am so gratified to hear that she says what is obvious. Things are changing rapidly, and it is time for the obvious to be spoken. Her assessment that if women don’t have equal rights then a country will lag behind, is so true.
i so agree with you.
LOOK —-AT—-CLINTON… HOW MANY WOMEN ARE THERE OUT THERE THAT COULD COMPARE TO HILLARY?
IF WE HAVE ONE HERE AND ONE THERE DON’T WE FIGURE THAT OVERSEAS THERE ARE SOME WOMEN OUT THERE IN THEIR WORLDS THAT COULD BE COMPARED TO HILLARY? THINK HOW MUYCH BETTER OFF OUR WORLDS COULD BE IF THEY COULD GET THE MEN TO SAY —-OK THERE ARE SOME DAG GONE GOOD WOMEN WORKERS OUT THERE THAT COULD BE HELPING OUR COUNTRIES BETTER THEM SELVES.
GOD STILL LOVES WOMEN JUST AS MUCH AS HE LOVES THE MAN AND THERE IS NOTHIGN ANYONE CAN DO TO CONVINCE GOD THAT THE WOMEN ARE NOT AS GOOD AS MEN.
YES, THE 2 OF THEM I RELY ON —-THE 2 OF THEM. —-THEY ARE GOING TO START DOING SOMETHING W E I R D . ( SO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE JUST SITTING IN THEIR ROCKERS DAY IN AND DAY OUT —-AND—- THE LIGHTS ARE ON BUT NO ONE IS AT HOME.) THERE ARE SOME WHO GOD HAS SPOKEN TO - AND THEY DO SAY -OH WELL ,MOM AND DAD ARE STRICTLY OUT OF ANY CONCLUSION - ABOUT- ANYTHING - AND THEY WANT TO THINK THEY KNOW WHAT THE WORLD IS MADE OUT OF—-) . AND WHEN THE WEIRD THINGS START THEY’LL LIGHT UP BECAUSE THEY ARE SO IN THE BACKWOODS STILL FIRING DOWN THE RABBITS FOR DINNER - THESE ARE THE TIMES WHEN THOSE PEOPLE ARE BEING MOVED AROUND SOME THERE AND SOME THERE - WATCH AND SEE THEY WILL BE THE ONES TO START THE SAYINGS LIKE —- SEE- I TOLD YOU SO!
YES, I DO REALIZE THIS SOUNDS PATHETIC - BUT TO THE RUN OF THE MILL EVERYDAY PEOPLE THEY DO NOT UNSERSTAND THE WHYS AND THE HOWS. SO HILLARY AND BARACK WHEN YOU DO START YOUR WEIRD ACTIONS HIT THEM HARD AND HIT THEM STRAIGHT AND STAY IN THERE AND KNOCK THE PEOPLE IN THE HEAD IF NEED BE BOUT I DO OH I DO SAY —-GET ‘ER DONE N O W!!! HILLARY I BELIEVE STRONGLY YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE VICE PRESIDENT STILL YET . I REALLY DO BELIEV IF THE 2 OF YOU COULD HAVE WORKED IT OUT TO WHERE "GOOD JOE" COULD HAVE BEEN IN HILLARYS PLACE LIKE W O W !!!
Agreed. The job of first lady is indeed different. However (and this is just my opinion) she was the first (first lady) I can recall that was assertive in voicing her opinions and then taking the steps (albeit through Bill Clinton) to see her ideas on health care and reform addressed. She was the first to enter the White House with a clear set of agendas of what she wanted to see accomplished.
I respect her for that and because it was such a glaring difference from every other first lady, all the more apparent. It appears Michelle will follow suit in that regard because she has said she feels strongly about military family rights and benefits as well as education for the nation’s children.
My friends, both Secretary Clinton and international diplomacy are far too complex to be reduced to the dichotomy of either "breath of fresh air" or "lightning rod."
As always, the answer is in the shades of grey in between.
Lily Rose
So true so true