Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 01/09/2009 12:55 pm

Huffington's Hang-up: Get to the Bottom of the Bailout, Not Blago

By The staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Arianna Huffington has a bone to pick with the media.

The cable news outlets, she says, are focusing too much on the "Blago/Burris/Reid and Kennedy/Paterson/Cuomo soap operas," and not enough time investigating how we’re spending the government’s multibillion-dollar bailout.

"Why have the media shown such relatively little interest in the utter lack of transparency about the bailout? Is it because they are still in campaign mode - addicted to small bore, quick burn-out stories?" she writes in a column on her site, the Huffington Post. "The time has come to recalibrate. … Admittedly, governing stories aren’t usually as sexy as campaign stories … [But] this mystery is unfolding right in front of us, and the size of the victim pool could very well depend on whether we unravel the mystery in flashback or while it’s still in progress."

Huffington’s not the only person calling for an explanation. A congressional oversight panel will today release a report accusing the Treasury Department of not telling its strategy for getting the financial system back on track, of having done nothing to help troubled homeowners and of having "significant gaps" in its ability to track the hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer money, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Incoming Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and other members of Barack Obama’s economic team are trying to overhaul the program and expand it to help more than just Wall Street.

Sources told The Washington Post:

Geithner has been working night and day on the eighth floor of the transition team office in downtown Washington with Lawrence H. Summers and other senior economic advisers to hash out a new approach that would expand the program’s aid to municipalities, small businesses, homeowners and other consumers. With lawmakers stewing over how Bush administration officials spent the first $350 billion, Geithner has little chance of winning congressional approval for the second half without retooling the program."

Word has it the new plan would use more bailout money to help homeowners avoid foreclosure and unclog the credit markets that finance loans to consumers, small businesses and municipalities that rely on credit to pay public employees like police. That should be good news to Main Street and beyond – the real ones who have suffered from Wall Street’s misdeeds.

80 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

f p
She’s right—apparently there is very little oversight by the Fed on how OUR money is being spent—we can blame Paulson for this one. I want to know how that money is being spent down to the last damned penny. and frankly I don’t trust BushCo one little bit to do anything about this. There needs to be oversight on this —so where is it?
By f p on 01/09/2009 1:06 pm
Tee Zee
Oh lets throw Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi under that bus for passing that piece of junk without the necessary oversight included, or can’t they read either.
By Tee Zee on 01/09/2009 8:59 pm
f p
I’d drink to that. lol
By f p on 01/10/2009 7:37 am
C jay
I think we can blame both Paulson and “The Hedge,” fp, but more likely the roving-architect. Bush just does what he’s told. In fact, I believe that the Blago “thing” was released by “whomever” controls the FBI, as a smoke screen to take our eyes and minds off the Bail-Out Mystery, and tracking the funds siphoning off to Texas. Who controls the FBI? The chief exec. There is no other reason that this would “go down” when it did, and worse, manipulate our FBI by having them release the chain of evidence to the media (the recordings) making them no longer submissable in court - thus, it was never intended to have Blago tried! It did get our attention, but not quite enough, and Blago called it!
By C jay on 01/12/2009 1:39 am
f p
Blago is just a smoke screen; the real issue is the big bucks and where have they gone. Transparency my ass.
By f p on 01/12/2009 7:50 am
S.J. Morgan
She just wants to deflect anything controversial that might associate with Obama.
By S.J. Morgan on 01/09/2009 1:33 pm
Kathrine Gluvna
SJ, I disagree. If you read her columns, you’ll find that she is critical of Obama when she thinks he is not holding up his part of the election bargain. Yes, she supported him during the election, but now she is holding him accountable for his promises.
By Kathrine Gluvna on 01/09/2009 2:03 pm
Frannie Em
Katherine Which promises and to which political outlook?
By Frannie Em on 01/09/2009 7:16 pm
Linda Mason
Happy Obama Year, SJ! Any relation to PJ Morgan, the Banker? Just askin’! As for Ms. Huffington’s motives, of course I don’t know what they are (and I doubt that you are clairvoyant), but it seems that SHE IS LOOKING OUT FOR YOU! and me, and all of us!!!! What’s wrong with that??? You might be grateful!!! In fact, maybe — (admittedly, I doubt it) — if we investigate we will learn that the administration of the WORST PRESIDENT EVER (ie, GWB) has done an admirable job allocating the $700 billion of OUR $$$$!!!! So shining a spotlight on it would be doing a kindness to his reputation — don’t you agree? Or do you think that we would learn that GWB and his cronies spent the money injudiciously? I mean — what’s the harm in asking, SJ???
By Linda Mason on 01/10/2009 8:38 pm
Maurine H
Huffington is right and we all know it. But the media feeds the insatiable greed of the public for sensationalism. Blago is a bizarre character who is clever about manipulating the media and the government. Money issues aren’t sexy topics. Using wOw as a bellweather, just count the number of posts on Coulter or Palin topics vis a vis posts on any of those relating to the economy. Either we’re easily fascinated by a spicy scandal or we’re living in denial- or both.
By Maurine H on 01/09/2009 2:18 pm
f p
WEll said Maurine—this is exactly it.
By f p on 01/09/2009 2:26 pm
Frannie Em
Mo and Frank Have you gone over to Liz Peek’s thread and read or posted anything about the economy, or the decisions being made about it? To be honest, I haven’t done much posting on the economic threads either, but I am starting. I believe Ms Huffington makes a strong point about the focus of the media. They were so focused for the last two years when the Hillary and Obama started the big race that they took their eye off of the ball. Where was her focus at that time? Seems like many journalists are having remorse over not going for the big important stories, the election took everyone’s attention away. The whole financial mess is such a morass of intertwined problems that it is almost beyond comprehension. De-regulation and the problems with Fannie and Freddie are way up at the top, but there is a whole wild west scenario played out incestuously between Washington and Wall Street. Yee Haw!, while the U.S. taxpayer is ending up D.O.A.
By Frannie Em on 01/09/2009 7:27 pm
Maurine H
Hi Frannie - I don’t have much to say on Liz Peek’s threads because I’m usually on the other side of her opinions. Both Liz and her husband, Jeff Peek, are conservative Republicans who contributed the maximum amounts to the McCain campaign. Liz also supported Elizabeth Dole. Consequently, her opinions on the Obama administration are probably going to be negative. I’m not saying she’s not smart (obviously her career proves otherwise), but I don’t think she’s going to view the problems with the economy from the vantage point of middle class Americans like me.
By Maurine H on 01/09/2009 8:52 pm
Frannie Em
Hi Mo I understand. You know, sometimes she reports and it is informational and sometimes from her economic background, and other times those mixed in with more opinion. Well, a middle class american like me reads a couple of them. I don’t always agree with Huffpo, but pick up on the links at times because I read both sides. Step back, leave it alone, and then read it again. If I leave a post that is full of why why why, lol, it just means I only read it once, or had been thinking about the same thing for a while. I am glad Liz Peek is here. She will come on and answer questions and that can be helpful.
By Frannie Em on 01/09/2009 11:00 pm
f p
I agree Mo—she’s not able I think to see where we are in relation to the rich and her opinions on Obama are somewhat negative.
By f p on 01/10/2009 7:46 am