Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Lesley Stahl | 04/08/2008 4:17 pm

I Read the News Today, Oh Boy: Will Obama Prove Them Wrong?

Lesley Stahl

I did a story for “60 Minutes” years ago about Denny’s, the restaurant chain, which was then embroiled in a discrimination lawsuit. As part of the story, my producer, a black woman, and I went into a Denny’s separately, sat at the counter alongside each other, and ordered. She was convinced that the waitress sneered at her, deliberately served her after she served me, and all but threw her food at her. I noticed none of that, even though I was looking for it. But to the producer it was real, and painful.

Fast forward to the current presidential campaign. From the beginning, just about every black friend and reporter I know has said that Obama can’t win the election because, as in the incident at Denny’s, prejudice is subtle, and enduring.

But as the campaign has sputtered along, I’ve been thinking that Obama’s victories are proving them all wrong.

Then today I read a smart column in the Washington Post by Richard Cohen, who points out that in the primaries Obama has done well with white voters in states where there are few blacks. Where there are substantial black populations – Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, New Jersey – the white vote has tipped overwhelmingly to Hillary.

Cohen says the persistence of racism makes Obama especially vulnerable to a Republican image assault like the Willie Horton ads that Bush “41” ran to portray his opponent, Michael Dukakis, as soft on black rapists.

I was in Washington over the weekend where I heard variations on the Cohen theme: Obama can’t win because the Republicans will make him into another liberal George McGovern … or effete Adlai Stevenson. (He should NEVER have bowled in that tie!) But it is the race issue that hovers over everything.

But I keep remembering that many of the same analysts and blacks who say Obama can’t win the election, said he couldn’t win the nomination. Which, I suppose, is still a possibility.

Cohen says we’ll have a better handle on all this by April 22, the night of the Pennsylvania primary. This is a state with lots of blacks.

265 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Bella Mia- Here is Obama’s legislation record: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama And Obama’s voting record by the Washington Post. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/o000167/ Here is President Kennedy’s excellent speech before the American Newspaper Publishers Association in NYC, April 27, 1961 about secret societies and freedom of the press. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yUbPMKRUeU Thomas Sowell, the economist you refer to is called ‘the black conservative.’ He is a fellow at Stanford Hoover Institute, one the the most conservative think-tanks in the country, and on December 17, 1998 in writing called for Clinton’s impeachment for a BJ while also in writing has defended media attacks on GOP congressmen for much worse as “frivolous media.” He and Walter Williams, the other black economist you refer to and who many call ‘radical,’ are friends. Williams has hosted Rush Limbaugh’s show. McCain is all for staying in Iraq for the next 100 years. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000303/votes/ Here’s what the Bush policies that these men support have done to the us: Watch this simple but accurate depiction of the disgraceful ruination of our economy in order to fund an illegal, immoral, phony war to enrich Haliburton and the rest of Bush’s war profiteering amigos with billions in no-bid contracts while we mortgage our future to China. http://www.truemajorityaction.org/oreos/ And the problem with Obama being “Liberal” is? I know that the GOP has set out to make it a dirty word. In fact the Heritage Foundation paid for the printing and mailing of a booklet sent to major Far Right activists around the country wherein Tom Delay as Speaker of the House cited Stalinists tactics “….Not to debate liberals but to wipe them off the face of this Earth.” Every age that sprung from darkness to light: the Golden Age of Greece, the Renaissance, the 18th century Enlightenment values on which America is based was liberal and progressive meaning: advanced, enlightened, high-minded, unprejudiced. Every high performing US economy by government statics going back to Hoover was led by a liberal. President John F. Kennedy on being a liberal… “I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human liberty as the source of national action, in the human heart as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, the faith in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the liberal faith. For liberalism is not so much a party creed or set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith in man’s ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of justice and freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves. I believe also in the United States of America, in the promise that it contains and has contained throughout our history of producing a society so abundant and creative and so free and responsible that it cannot only fulfill the aspirations of its citizens, but serve equally well as a beacon for all mankind. I do not believe in a superstate. I see no magic in tax dollars which are sent to Washington and then returned. I abhor the waste and incompetence of large-scale federal bureaucracies in this administration as well as in others. I do not favor state compulsion when voluntary individual effort can do the job and do it well. But I believe in a government which acts, which exercises its full powers and full responsibilities. Government is an art and a precious obligation; and when it has a job to do, I believe it should do it. And this requires not only great ends but that we propose concrete means of achieving them. Our responsibility is not discharged by announcement of virtuous ends. Our responsibility is to achieve these objectives with social invention, with political skill, and executive vigor. I believe for these reasons that liberalism is our best and only hope in the world today. For the liberal society is a free society, and it is at the same time and for that reason a strong society. Its strength is drawn from the will of free people committed to great ends and peacefully striving to meet them. Only liberalism, in short, can repair our national power, restore our national purpose, and liberate our national energies. What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label “Liberal?” If by “Liberal” they mean, as they want people to believe, someone who is soft in his policies abroad, who is against local government, and who is unconcerned with the taxpayer’s dollar, then the record of this party and its members demonstrate that we are not that kind of “Liberal.” But if by a “Liberal” they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people — their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties — someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a “Liberal,” then I’m proud to say I’m a “Liberal.”
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/08/2008 6:57 pm
Peg O my heart
Suzanne - Amen and Halleleujah! Thank you so much for articulating beautifully what I (and probably so many of us) feel but lack the talent or gumption to express. I truly believe in the man, from the sincerity in his appeals to us, to his determination that NOW is the time for ALL of us to come together and take back this country. And thank you for reminding those who NEED reminding that “Liberal” is NOT a dirty word.
By Peg O my heart on 04/08/2008 8:56 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Peg O my Heart—-LIBERAL is a great word! Though many from BOTH sides of the aisle need to be swept out…and there are GOP members I really admire and am sorry to see go—-like Senator Chuck Hagel.
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/08/2008 10:38 pm
Simmy Sussman
I’m a liberal too. But I do not feel that Obama is at all qualified to be Commander In Chief. Obama served as senator in the Illinois State Assembly . Assembly met for 75 days a year. His backstory in Chicago on all counts is atrocious. He cannot be believed as authentic if we really examine his voting patterns, his mentor Tony Rezko, his Pastor Wright, and friend Ayers. I’m only touching on this lightly, and it is not good. His performance in US Senate was full of absences as he started his incompleted term running for President. As Chairman of Subcommittee on Foreign Relations for Europe, he did not convene ONE meeting. He in fact, did nothing. He has lied about lobbyists. The New York Times featured a story about Obama and the Exelon lobbyist who donated $227,000.00 to Obama, as has David Axelrod, Obama’s campaign manager who has been a lobbyist for Exelon. Exelon is the country’s largest Nuclear Power plant provider and is in Illinois. When the vote l came up last year before the senate to approve loan guarantees for nuclear power providers, Obama voted FOR it. Hillary AGAINST it. I have no doubt the fix is in from Dean and co. to anoint Obama, and have no idea if he can win. He has political skills coupled with gifted oratory that has convinced many of his invincibile purity and ability to right all the wrongs…Presto! Will this work? I don’t know, but I hope not.
By Simmy Sussman on 04/08/2008 9:12 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Simmy- I respect what you are saying and listen to this too from my darling mother, who is voting for Hillary. And from my wonderful father, who is voting for McCain. But when I check back in history to the people who changed it and those I most admire; Pericles, Pico della Mirandolla, Kind Rene of Provence, Lafayette, Joan of Arc, Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson (I know, a genuis) they raised armies and changed cultures by spirit. No one running is a saint, none of us are. I repeat myself to quote Einstein that to do the same things and expect a different result is the beginning of insanity. Clinton and McCain are clones of the past. She is a lightening rod and that will be a distraction. We need a whole new change. Someone who can articulate a vision and get people inspired and hoping again. Spirit is what changes the world. In the Depression people spent their last dimes to see movies, their last dollar to see Seabiscuit the ‘milk cart pony’ beat the Eastern establishment elite and unbeatable War Admirable. Joan of Arc was an unschooled 17 year old girl, the greatest person who ever lived according to Mark Twain, she Commanded the Army and saved occupied France during the 100 Year War when no one else could. It took her eight days to make the pivotal move. France is the most visited country on Earth…all of those monuments in Paris, the 18th c Enlightenment on which this country is based. None of it would have happened without the change brought about in France’s darkest hour by that one small, very strategic, brilliantly articulate girl.
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/08/2008 10:23 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Simmy- Here’s a piece from Huffington Post on Mark Penn, Hillary’s adviser until this week making hundreds of thousands from Exelon, etc. And Hillary voted for Bush’s phony war. That’s enough for me.
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/08/2008 10:30 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Mark Penn, Hillary’s advisor, was paid $230,000. by Exelon. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/14/mark-penn-tied-to-controv_n_867…
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/09/2008 12:51 am
Charlotte Royal
Obama is going to win the Presidency. The young people will see to it as well as we older voters. When Kennedy was campaigning, I was young and we worked for him. He had the same magnetic appeal - intellectually,spritually and yes-physically - that Obama possesses. They have in common the gift of inspiring and leading. They share a wit and facility to communicate.The graceful coolness is an asset because all the false ‘declaiming’, tired rhetoric and lame humor of McCain and even Hillary, are off-putting. Hillary is a brilliant and talented woman. She just does not have the gifts that Obama has been blessed with. We are all- young and older- so very fatigued and disallusioned after eight long years of an incompetent,inarticulate, incurious President, who has destroyed so much that is good about America. He has shredded the Constitution , lied and manipulated us into a war that has killed 4000 and more of our beautiful youth, put us at risk financially by reckless spending and debt. The list of possible horribles- as Obama said- goes on and on. We need Barack Obama’s message of hope and reason, and his intelligent assessments. Be hopeful ! He will win. Charlotte R.
By Charlotte Royal on 04/09/2008 8:28 pm
A B
What are we to think of the staggering number of Obama’s “present” votes (voting neither yes nor no), and his stunning number of missed votes since 1991 leading up to his 38% missed votes during the current Congress? What is the Mid-East to think if his public words are just words, and if his US military withdrawal is to Iraq as Nafta is to Canada? Are we to feel relieved that Obama is a blank slate on which we can write our fantasies? He is our “Pericles, Pico della Mirandolla, Kind Rene of Provence, Lafayette, Joan of Arc, Thomas Paine, and Thomas Jefferson” (but without the slaves). If he wants to be “raising armies and changing cultures by spirit” but then giving an anti-war speech at an anti-war rally but then when actually voting, voting with Hillary, but then, but then, but then I suppose Einstein would say everything is relative. If Clinton and McCain are clones of the past, let us hope that Obama is not a clone of his spiritual advisor of twenty years. If Clinton has to battle the Eastern establishment Kennedy / Kerry Obama supporters, let us hope that she is the ‘milk cart pony’ named Seabiscuit who has the tenacity to make it down the final stretch. If Clinton has to be burned at the stake on a daily basis by the sexist press, let us hope this “very strategic, brilliantly articulate” woman is watched over by the spirit of Joan of Arc.
By A B on 04/09/2008 7:56 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Always love reading your posts AB….What would you think if they put the country first and joined together on a ticket?
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/09/2008 11:45 pm
A B
Suzanne de Cornelia , I have no thoughts about them on a ticket but, because you and I have not been purchased by special interests, I have thoughts that we might join on a write-in ticket. I volunteer to be your VP. Grace Zia Chu, one of the first to teach Chinese cooking in America, told me when she was in her 90’s that the reason she is living so long is because she never accepted president but rather always vice president. Also I volunteer to be the Hunter in this Hunter / Gatherer world, for I see you are a great Gatherer of words and of people.
By A B on 04/10/2008 12:31 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
AB—Ha! Grace Zia Chu sounds like a great lady. With my shattered foot and 80% bedrest til May 18…I’m not running for much of anything….
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/11/2008 4:27 am
A B
The world better get ready for May 18th. I know everything is going to be fine.
By A B on 04/11/2008 12:11 pm
Rita S
Simmy, I agree. Those who support Obama are taken in by his rhetoric and don’t really know who he is. What we do know, however, is who his friends are. I just read this on another website and I couldn’t have said it better: “Yes, I have doubts about Barak Obama’s judgment of those he chooses to keep company with. His pastor is a rabid racist and anti-American nut. Obama is friends with a convicted terrorist named Ayres (sp) who set off bombs in the U.S. in the ’60s. Obama is very cozy with a con man named Rezko who is now on trial for shady dealing and who has very close ties to an international con man who dealt regulary with Hussein of Iraq and other Muslim strong men and who raised money for Obama. All of this really gives me pause to think that Obama is not at all who he pretends to be but rather a con man himself who has a great gift of gab and also a huge lack of judgment (note his friends) or worse.”
By Rita S on 04/08/2008 11:53 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Rita- The problem with allusions that have a bit of truth is that they can easily be counter with the same and more against Hillary or McCain. Bush and Hillary had dealings with Rezko and whatever he did will be revealed in a court of law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Rezko At the same time a former big time supporter of Hillary funded a pretty devastating documentary against her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7uDjYRc3MU Dirty politics aren’t new. With all sides spending tens of millions digging up, or making up things to discredit the other, or slanting the truth so that the opponent is always in defensive mode. I don’t think much of it will change anyone’s mind. We can all agree that our choice reflects who we believe out of the will best lead the country. The candidates will duke it out and someone will prevail.
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/09/2008 12:44 am