Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Lesley Stahl | 04/08/2008 4:17 pm

I Read the News Today, Oh Boy: Will Obama Prove Them Wrong?

Lesley Stahl

I did a story for “60 Minutes” years ago about Denny’s, the restaurant chain, which was then embroiled in a discrimination lawsuit. As part of the story, my producer, a black woman, and I went into a Denny’s separately, sat at the counter alongside each other, and ordered. She was convinced that the waitress sneered at her, deliberately served her after she served me, and all but threw her food at her. I noticed none of that, even though I was looking for it. But to the producer it was real, and painful.

Fast forward to the current presidential campaign. From the beginning, just about every black friend and reporter I know has said that Obama can’t win the election because, as in the incident at Denny’s, prejudice is subtle, and enduring.

But as the campaign has sputtered along, I’ve been thinking that Obama’s victories are proving them all wrong.

Then today I read a smart column in the Washington Post by Richard Cohen, who points out that in the primaries Obama has done well with white voters in states where there are few blacks. Where there are substantial black populations – Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, New Jersey – the white vote has tipped overwhelmingly to Hillary.

Cohen says the persistence of racism makes Obama especially vulnerable to a Republican image assault like the Willie Horton ads that Bush “41” ran to portray his opponent, Michael Dukakis, as soft on black rapists.

I was in Washington over the weekend where I heard variations on the Cohen theme: Obama can’t win because the Republicans will make him into another liberal George McGovern … or effete Adlai Stevenson. (He should NEVER have bowled in that tie!) But it is the race issue that hovers over everything.

But I keep remembering that many of the same analysts and blacks who say Obama can’t win the election, said he couldn’t win the nomination. Which, I suppose, is still a possibility.

Cohen says we’ll have a better handle on all this by April 22, the night of the Pennsylvania primary. This is a state with lots of blacks.

265 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

janis javorcky
Barack Obama is an interesting man. He’s erudite, knows how to talk to people but I don’t trust him. He’s too young, has a quick temper and he’s also too calm. Those two attitudes together are not good. I feel a sense of his feeling a bit above us. It would be a dream team for me if it was Clinton President, Barack Obama Vice President. No one could beat us. Thanks, Janis
By janis javorcky on 04/09/2008 12:03 am
Bella Mia
I was raised with all brothers. I have a great nurturing father, and dated many wonderful men - not a loser among them, and married for 25 years to a great guy with 4 sons of my own - and let me tell you I can say with certainty that Barak Obama is a Beta male. He is not an alpha male, and worse, does not understand how to deal with bully alpha’s like his preacher. He becomes submissive to them. That is why he is so willing to talk to iran - as he sees murderous, meglomaniacal Iran leaders as the saviors of Iraq. It reflects judgement of a very naive, poor variety.
By Bella Mia on 04/09/2008 3:11 am
Kay Sara
bella mia -Yes! That is it! Obama is a beta male! Yes!!!! He is not a strong man. Now Corey Booker would and should be the first black President. Put Obama next to Booker- hands down Booker wins - no comparison! The powers to be behind Obama selected Obama because they knew they could control him for their own agenda. Just like Cheney controls Bush. A vote for Obama is a vote for someone you have no idea will be ruling. Please don’t do this to us again!
By Kay Sara on 04/09/2008 5:59 pm
A B
Would a beta male have the courage to say his middle name is Hussein? Would a beta male have the courage to say there have been people with the name Hussein who have been just and good? Would a beta male have the courage to say for every Saddam Hussein there is a Hussein bin Talal, King of Jordan who was a man with the courage of his convictions, courage even when he was fifteen years old chasing the assassin who shot his grandfather the king in front of him and who survived the bullet meant for him because of a medal that he wore, a medal that deflected the bullet, a medal given to him by his grandfather? Would a beta male have the courage to say my father’s side of the family is Muslim? Would a beta male have the courage to say within the one to two billion Muslims in the world, there are Muslims who are just and good? Would a beta male have the courage to say that Muslims believe in the Biblical prophets and believe that the prophets are Muslims, including Jesus, Mathew, Mark, Luke, John and going back in time to Moses, Noah and Adam? Does America want a pusillanimous beta male in the White House? Never trust a man with no middle initial.
By A B on 04/10/2008 1:30 pm
robert b
i am a democrat. i was initially for hillary because i thought she could win; now i am wavering. i could live with either one. my two opinions are: 1) i don’t like the CLEAR bias in favor of obama and against hillary—yes, he sounds refreshing and she sounds trite; and there is the clinton fatigue; but it shouldn’t be a popularity contest. 2) the states where obama is winning are mostly RED states where the democratic candidate will NEVER win. it doesn’t mean he can’t win, and i may vote for him, but don’t most (all) democrats want to ensure that a Democrat will be in the white house? i do.
By robert b on 04/09/2008 12:04 am
MP L
The problem is that people will expect the first viable, Black, presidential candidate to be perfect all the time…an impossible task. He is human and will make mistakes and unfortunately these will always be viewed through the prism of race rather than just a human errors. Therefore, every error will be discussed in racial terms. There is no way to overcome this in a nation where in order to get the support of the White population, one has to be a perfect, Black candidate.
By MP L on 04/09/2008 12:09 am
Pauline Waldt
Just found your web site and so far I find it very entertaining and informative…..keep up the great work! Us, wee girls, need all the help we can get out here. Love all the subjects and responses. Much more entertaining than “Drudge” but are you lifting your topics from him????
By Pauline Waldt on 04/09/2008 12:17 am
Barbara Henry
What person has ever had a job of any kind and never made mistakes? Ask any government official, any CEO, any military leader, yet they were put into position to make gigantic decisions. If you stop to think about it, the Presdient of the U.S. has so many people there to assist them in every decision they make. They don’t stand alone. This country needs someone who has new fresh ideas and a new way of looking at things. We’ve already seen what those who have practically grown up in politics has done to our country. They forget every decision they make affects all the people of the U.S. We can’t afford to have things done as they have been in the past. We need someone who cares. We need someone to be there for us. That’s Obama. B. Henry
By Barbara Henry on 04/09/2008 12:23 am
Sharon Quinn
Unfortunately, I am not terribly impressed by either of the Democrats or Mr. McCain. I have well thought out reasons for my reluctance to support any of them. I am somewhat dismayed by the tendency of some of the contributers to this posting to blame one of the “isms” for the unpopularity of his or her candidate. Give the voters credit for making decisions based on the broad range of their experiences and not on narrowly defined prejudices.
By Sharon Quinn on 04/09/2008 12:26 am
Pearl Little
Bella Mia wrote: “I’ve often wondered when I’ve had unprofessional service from a service worker of my race - white - if a black person would have chalked the bad service up to racism. I find bad, poor, disinterested service is endemic, and it happens about 70% of the time to me. How is anyone able to differentiate between racism and generically bad service? I think it would be very difficult, if not impossible to tell the difference.” I have experienced a lot of anti-white racism from (a minority of) Blacks, most of them women. Sometimes it is obvious that it is racism (and sexism - in most cases white men would not have gotten the same treatment). Othertimes I am not sure, so I watch how the same person treats a stranger who is Black. Usually when I suspect it was racism, I see by the difference in their behavior toward Blacks that it was. It is disgusting, but if you react to it, and defend yourself, you will look like a racist, because the public discourse is totally focused on how Blacks are victimized by racism, never about how so many feel free to dish it out (a la Trinity Church). Sometimes I imagine listing all the anti-racism that’s been directed against me, only changing the race, as if it happened to a Black person. In that context, people would be outraged and astonished, at least I hope they would. But society seems to agree as a whole that whites are legitimate targets, are suppose to just take it as an atonement for the actions that they (or their immigrant ancestors) did not participate in or support. I agree with the points made by many posting here that Obama, a man who had to lie about what he did as a Senator because he had nothing real to point to, is where he is in the campaign because he is Black, and a great speaker. Whites want to atone for the imposed feeling of guilt, and being an Obama supporter makes them feel redeemed. Of course this is simplistic take on it, but I do believe it is part of the dynamic. Most Black voters understandably want a Black candidate to win, and this sways them in favor of Obama. Furthermore, Obama gets a free pass because of the guilt based pandering of the white controlled media. There is way too much at stake in every way for such muddled perceptions and responses to a muddled dialogue on race.
By Pearl Little on 04/09/2008 12:35 am
Kay Sara
Pearl, I agree with all you say. I told a stroy when I was 13 a black boy asked me on a date and I had to turn him down. I was not allowed to date until I was 16. He accused me of turning him down because he was black. Obama is not qualified - not be because he is black- because is not qualified. I also see the exuberant white support for Obama as an act to rectify the slavery guilt and show their “openmindedness”. Neither is a good reason to vote for Obama. Now Corey Booker is another story- there is a qualified candidate and he would not be the behind the scene power brokers puppet - as Obama ( Beta male ) is.
By Kay Sara on 04/09/2008 6:08 pm
Miriam Pat Thorpe
Obama will win the Democratic nomination and he’ll win in November. That’s just how it is. He’s new, he’s dynamic, he’s gathering in the country. How many of us see him as a black man anymore? He’s just Barack Obama and he’s a winner.
By Miriam Pat Thorpe on 04/09/2008 12:43 am
ccb ccb
From my desk in Galway, Ireland: As an American living here and who was raised inside the Beltway, I feel that Obama, who has the werewithal and the savvy to play the Washington game, will unfortunately not be elected because the American people are still prejudiced and have become incredibly depressed and isolated because of their past voting choices. I stay hopeful and applaud all who support him. But remember that movies like “Charlie Wilson’s War” are actually a pretty accurate depiction of politics and people’s ability to stick their heads in the sand.
By ccb ccb on 04/09/2008 12:45 am
Emma Pathey
In my opinion Obama has neither the experience nor the character to make a good president. He has chosen to be “black” rather than bi-racial, and his support of his former pastor is abhorrent. Any decent person would have immediately disavowed not only the opinions expressed by Rev. Wright but have disassociated himself totally from such a person. But Obama has chosen not to do so, and in my opinion this is a major flaw in his character which makes him unfit to be president. I am a supporter of Hilary Clinton. She has the intelligence, competency and ability to handle the job of President, and she has faced many firestorms, and has emerged perhaps not unscathed but definitely stronger in character for the experience. She will make an excellent President. I do not believe Obama has the necessary qualifications to be President. If he becomes the nominee, I believe the Democratic Party will have made a serious error of judgment. Unfortunately, McCain’s unbridled enthusiasm for the War makes it impossible for me to even consider voting for him. So it will come down to a great deal of nose holding if I am forced to choose between Obama and McCain. Horrors!!!
By Emma Pathey on 04/09/2008 12:46 am
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Well, Emma, may not completely agree, but love your hat!!
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/09/2008 2:46 am