Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 08/12/2008 11:00 am

Random House Pulls Book From Shelves Amid Fear of Islamist Violence

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
iStock

Random House’s scrapping of a novel seen as possibly offensive by some Muslims, originally scheduled to hit shelves today, is causing a ruckus.

The Jewel of Medina, the debut novel of journalist Sherry Jones, is about Prophet Muhammad’s child bride A’isha, who is often referred to as Muhammad’s favorite wife. The story details her life, from her engagement at the age of six, until the prophet’s death. Jones said that she was shocked to learn in May that publication would be postponed indefinitely. 

"I have deliberately and consciously written respectfully about Islam and Mohammed … I envisioned that my book would be a bridge-builder," Jones told Reuters.

Random House said they received information from “credible and unrelated sources” that publication of the book “might be offensive to some in the Muslim community, but also that it could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment.”

“We felt an obligation to take these concerns very seriously,” Random House said in a statement. “We consulted with security experts as well as with scholars of Islam, whom we asked to review the book and offer their assessments of potential reactions.”

The statement adds: “We decided, after much deliberation, to postpone publication for the safety of the author, employees of Random House, booksellers and anyone else who would be involved in distribution and sale of the novel.”

Random House’s decision came to light this past week after The Wall Street Journal published a column by Muslim writer and scholar Asra Nomani, saying she was "saddened" by the turn of events.

In that August 6 column, entitled, “You Still Can’t Write About Muhammed,” Nomani said: “This saga upsets me as a Muslim — and as a writer who believes that fiction can bring Islamic history to life in a uniquely captivating and humanizing way.

Nomani said Jones told her she wanted to “honor Aisha and all the wives of Muhammad by giving voice to them, remarkable women whose crucial roles in the shaping of Islam have so often been ignored — silenced — by historians."

Nomani pointed the finger at American Denise Spellberg, an associate professor of History and Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Texas at Austin and author of Politics, Gender, and the Islamic Past: The Legacy of A’isha Bint Abi Bakr.

“In an interview, Ms. Spellberg told me the novel is a ‘very ugly, stupid piece of work.’” Nomani wrote. Spellberg also told her: “I don’t have a problem with historical fiction. I do have a problem with the deliberate misinterpretation of history. You can’t play with a sacred history and turn it into soft-core pornography.”

Two days later, on August 9, Spellberg had her own response published in the Wall Street Journal, saying she was not to blame for Random House’s decision to yank the book.

“I never had this power, nor did I single-handedly stop the book’s publication,” Spellberg wrote in the column, “I Didn’t Kill The Jewel of Medina.”

“As a historian invited to ‘comment’ on the book by its Random House editor at the author’s express request, I objected strenuously to the claim that The Jewel of Medina was ‘extensively researched,’ as stated on the book jacket. As an expert on A’isha’s life, I felt it was my professional responsibility to counter this novel’s fallacious representation of a very real woman’s life … I felt it my duty to warn the press of the novel’s potential to provoke anger among some Muslims.

“There is a long history of anti-Islamic polemic that uses sex and violence to attack the Prophet and his faith. This novel follows in that oft-trodden path, one first pioneered in medieval Christian writings. The novel provides no new reading of Aisha’s life, but actually expands upon provocative themes regarding Muhammad’s wives first found in an earlier novel by Salman Rushdie, The Satanic Verses, which I teach. I do not espouse censorship of any kind, but I do value my right to critique those who abuse the past without regard for its richness or resonance in the present.”

Read more about: book, News, Random House

11 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Frank Peterson
Corporate paranoia and corporate gutlessness—Random House: you should be ashamed of yourselves.
By Frank Peterson on 08/12/2008 11:51 am
Serena .
If there is one thing I detest, it’s censorship.
By Serena . on 08/12/2008 12:51 pm
Diana T
So…these extremists are going to now determine what will and will not be censored in our own country and under our own laws? Shame! So, are we going to allow them to burn books as well? Geez!
By Diana T on 08/12/2008 1:29 pm
Diana T
Well, now, that article set me off. I must say that I sure have read plenty by these fanatics that upset me. We are going to learn the hard way the same that London had to: Give’em an inch and they’ll take a mile.
By Diana T on 08/12/2008 1:30 pm
Frank Peterson
Exactly!
By Frank Peterson on 08/12/2008 2:32 pm
Linda Clark
If Random House truly believes that this is not censorship; then I would anticipate, based on the contractual agreement with Ms. Jones, that the author seek out another publisher; relieving Random House from any liability with regard to violence. If Random House further believes itself to be obligated, to act as peacekeepers of sorts on behalf of citizens in a country founded on freedoms, then they may have underestimated the most basic measure of an intellectual populations world-wide! I respect Ms. Spellberg’s position and fully comprehend the foundation of her argument. Ms. Spellberg, by her own admission, teaches on one of the most controversial books published in recent history, that of Salman Rushdie “The Satanic Verses”. How is it that Ms. Spellberg is being waged as the cause for Ms. Jones’ book “The Jewel of Medina” to prohibited? She voiced her opinion from an historian’s professional point of view. There is more to this; and I don’t subscribe to the theory of a potential uprising. Is it possible that there will be those who are angered, absolutely. Does the potential for violence justify censorship, absolutely not.
By Linda Clark on 08/12/2008 1:35 pm
Lady Gator
Linda……….Right On! The Author should definitely be let out of her contract . Furthermore, she should seek another publisher. I’m sure, after articles like this — there are plenty of other publishers who would love to have this book. I agree, there is much more to this. Censorship, on any subject is just out and out wrong. Is there any political reason — other than their fear of an uprising? If it’s television and you don’t like the program you tune it out. If you don’t like a book — don’t read it! But come on. Maybe they’ve had threats if the book is published. If so, by whom?
By Lady Gator on 08/12/2008 2:36 pm
Linda Clark
Hey Lady Gator! ….. My gut instinct tells me it’s two fold. The first being, not much interest in the book itself, based on Ms. Jones’ writing style. The second being …. is Random house looking to expand in the Middle East. Both plausible, yes?
By Linda Clark on 08/12/2008 2:44 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Just because someone has written a book does not necessarily guarantee the right of publication. The book must be saleable. The book, if portraying historical figures in a fictional concept, must at least have some truth and a plausible explanation for actions not already accredited as historical fact. According to the expert consulted by Random House, The Jewel of Medina, included too many suppositions and little plausibility as to the main character, Aisha, a true figure from history. The author has the right to seek out another publisher but not the right to demand publication.
By Bonnie Oliver on 08/12/2008 3:31 pm
Tee Zee
If the author stands by her work and can’t find a publisher she should self publish. There are plenty of resources on the web to help her.
By Tee Zee on 08/13/2008 3:52 pm
Sherrie Crews
They have religious freedom in this country as granted by the constitution, but we allow them to take away our freedom of speech that’s granted by that same constitution by intimidating us out of talking about that religion. Anyone else see a problem with that?
By Sherrie Crews on 08/14/2008 7:10 am