Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 09/07/2008 4:53 pm

Controversial Jewel of Medina Book About Prophet Mohammed To Be Published in U.K.

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Shutterstock

A controversial novel that was pulled from publication before it even hit the shelves in the United States will be released in Britain next month.

Agence France-Presse reports that The Jewel of Medina by American author Sherry Jones, which is about the Prophet Mohammed and his child bride, will be published by Gibson Square. The publishing house is known for having sold other controversial books, such as Alexander Litvinenko’s Blowing Up Russia and House of Bush, House of Saud by Craig Unger. Gibson Square said it was "imperative" that Jones’s book be available to the public.

Random House earlier this summer announced that it canceled U.S. publication of the novel, which is a fictional account of Mohammed’s relationship with Aisha, his youngest bride. The publishing house said it had been informed that publishing the book could incite violence upon stores that sell it, and others. The book’s release in Serbia was also canceled because of protest from the Muslim community.

The company said it received information from "credible and unrelated sources" that publication of the book "might be offensive to some in the Muslim community, but also that it could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment." The Guardian notes that Random House was told by security experts and academics that the novel, for which it paid a $100,000 advance, was potentially more incendiary than both Rushdie’s novel The Satanic Verses and the Danish newspaper cartoons of Mohammad.

Martin Rynja, publishing director at Gibson Square, said, however, that in "an open society there has to be open access to literary works, regardless of fear."

The Washington Post reports that Jones has found other new publishers for her novel in Spain, Hungary, Italy, Russia, Germany and Brazil. In some places the book will come out next month, in others next spring.

9 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

G T
Does it bother you that here in America a book is not published because someone might be disturbed by its content? There are several books out there right now that disturb me because of the language and ideas they espouse, but I wouldn’t have them not published or sold to those to whom they have an appeal. The world is full of disturbing ideas. When radical Muslins can impose their censorship on what we can publish and read here in the US, we have given up a very important freedom.. So what if they are upset.? .If they break the law of our country by acting out, in ways that are illegal, then they are arrested and tried..for breaking the law, not for being upset. We are not and will never be under the law of Sharia, so lets not get started in that direction!!!! Muslims may have to follow the Koran but here in America we do not and we don’t have to follow Muslim law either. Whats next?? Burkas for all we women so radical Muslims won’t be offended??? Muslim religious police who can beat you severly up on the street if they decide you have committed some infraction of Sharia law? Boo to Random House for losing their nerve..
By G T on 09/08/2008 9:46 am
Frank Peterson
Random House’s cowardly act has convinced me to re-consider purchasing any product of theirs in the future. I find their act of censorship to be despicable.
By Frank Peterson on 09/08/2008 10:46 am
Diana T
I won’t say I can’t buy another Random House book, Frank, but I will say that I am glad that the book was published. I heard it discussed the other day on All Things Considered. I am sick and tired of caving in to the Terrorists; we cannot hide in our basements the rest of our lives. However, I am far more concerned with the banned book list that Mugsy has on her blogsite that apparently Palin wanted out of her library when she was mayor. Catch 22? The alleged list of about 90 books is shocking and, moreover scary. Book censorship for any reason in our country borders on you-know-what, and has Thomas Jefferson rolling in his grave any time people attempt it. Book censor ship is far more dangerous to our system of government and our national security than one book the Muslim Radicals may not approve of.
By Diana T on 09/08/2008 12:44 pm
Frank Peterson
Diana—what’s Mugsy’s link please—
By Frank Peterson on 09/08/2008 12:55 pm
Kathrine Gluvna
Frank, she gave it on another thread. www.mugsypeabody.blogspot.com
By Kathrine Gluvna on 09/08/2008 1:37 pm
Frank Peterson
Katherine—thank you so very much :-)
By Frank Peterson on 09/08/2008 1:44 pm
Kathrine Gluvna
No worries, Mate!
By Kathrine Gluvna on 09/08/2008 8:58 pm
Wafaa El  Jusmani
I absolutely agree that literary works should be published reagrdless of fear, however, when it comes to biographies and auto-biographies then the issue is a different one. Particularly when it comes to facts, research, and conclusions. The references are vital and it is in no one’s interest when facts, especially historic and religious, are taken and used in a manner that may lead to unnecessary consequences. Islam has very many sources and not all of them are those that the Islamic world would render significance, and to have them published or re-published in today’s social reading and mentality only incites cultural offense. My sole advice would be to publish such books should be to inform and in order to do so must be associated or undertaken jointly with a credible Islamic ref. to guarantee that the outcome is in everybody’s favour. If not and anyone drags any ref. from anywhere with historic social anecdotes that do not have credible bearing,only means that the intention is to insult.
By Wafaa El Jusmani on 09/08/2008 4:47 pm
Cheryl P
It is Banned Books Week. Check your library or bookseller or the American Library Association website for information. Palin is not the only threat to our libraries and schools. “Celebrate the Freedom to Read” And my wonderful library has plans to obtain the UK version of The Jewel of Medina to their collection.
By Cheryl P on 10/01/2008 12:40 pm