The Etceterist | 03/04/2009 12:25 pm
Jackie Kennedy and the Real Reason First Lady Michelle Obama Is Sleeveless

I couldn’t sleep at all last night! Tossing and turning and thinking about the great issue of the day: Michelle Obama sleeveless. So much debate and analysis, applause and shock … but as the historian of First Ladies Carl Sferrazza Anthony has blogged on The Huffington Post, Mamie Eisenhower, Bess Truman and Nancy Reagan all went sleeveless in the White House decades ago, so wake up and smell the perfume, America!
Click here to see a slideshow of the First Lady baring arms.
Meanwhile, here’s what I think is the big news. Concerning Mrs. Obama’s decision to wear Michael Kors’s black crepe jersey, sleeveless, racer-back gown (about $3,000 retail) in her first official White House portrait, this is where Sleevegate gets interesting.
It’s all about Jackie Kennedy.
It’s all about Jackie not just generally — Jackie and her Social Secretary, Letitia Baldrige, and all the ladies in their set wore sleeveless in their White House years — but specifically.
Jackie, seated, wearing red, is sleeveless in her official White House photograph. (In her official White House painting by Aaron Shikler, she wears long-sleeved yellow chiffon.) To date, Mrs. Obama’s decision to wear the sleeveless Michael Kors dress is the biggest hint she has given to indicate that, indeed, she is thinking about Jackie Kennedy when it comes to creating her role as the new First Lady.
Remember how many comparisons were drawn between Mrs. Kennedy and Mrs. Obama prior to the Inauguration? Quite rightly, in order to establish her own identity and platform, Mrs. Obama kept her distance from being compared to Jackie — until this portrait. At least that’s the conclusion I have come to.
Asked by an interviewer earlier this winter how much Jackie might influence Mrs. Obama’s style, White House Social Secretary Desirée Rogers answered: “It is definitely an inspiration for us because we hear people talk about it all the time. We would be remiss not to study those years carefully, not in order to duplicate them but to be inspired by them.”
Sleeveless was very Jackie then, and very Michelle now. Sleeveless is the ultimate status symbol. Yes, because it shows muscle and suggests power, the ability to defend as well as protect and embrace, but ultimately it is this: the status of sleeveless is: YOUTH.
Click here to see a slideshow of the First Lady baring arms.























163 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Geez! What an insipid point of view.
We all went sleeveless back then. And, I know if I had definition in my shoulders and arms, I would go sleeveless now. So would you. Mrs. Obama is not going around trying to be Jackie Kennedy, and I think the whole concept is silly.
Hell, show some of the countless pictures of Eleanor Roosevelt or Mamie Eisenhower going sleeveless. You’d think that Michelle was baring her boobs or something the way you all carry on about sleeveless. A fashion statement as old as the hills.
I think it’s such a silly subject. Anybody who has shoulder and arm definition such as hers is self assured enough to wear what they want without worrying about what people think.
And, we forget—or maybe younger people don’t realize—that sleeveless fashion has been around since the 20’s, and it wasn’t unusual to see Mamie or Eleanor or Lady Bird, for that matter wearing sleeveless.
Diana — I am utterly lacking in fashion sense, but I enjoy simply admiring Mrs. Obama. Oh, and I thought you might like a link to some photos of Mr. and Mrs. Kennedy in formal attire — those clothes and even her hairstyles would be at the epitome of fashion today. A classic …
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/06/dressy-jacqueline-kennedy_n_172468.html
True coutourier fashion never goes out of style, Rocky. At Kennedy’s Inaugural Ball, his mother wore a vintage 1930’s dress, and I forget who the designer was. It was totally current and beautiful. Most of Jackie Kennedy’s clothes could be worn today with some modifications, and some of her Cassini’s were current. I remember going to an exhibition of them at National Gallery. The detail was meticulous, which is what makes that level of fashion so costly these days. All handwork, and there are very few ateliers that are skillled enough. It is fast becoming a lost art.
Good fashion sense? What feels good and has classic lines, and is in proportion to the body? It doesn’t have to be expensive.
Sleeveless, sure, but sleeveless in FEBRUARY??!! I don’t remember Jackie being sleeveless in the winter, but my memory of the early sixties is a bit fogged by the late sixties.
Michelle is going to wear what she likes and look good. I just got a shiver when I saw her at Obama’s state of the union. I wanted to lend her my sweater.
S. J. we are both sick of this crap!
Michelle Obama has no style. This comparison to Jackie O is another liberal attempt to try and built this corrupt Obama administration into something its not.
Every since baby Caroline Kennedy compared Obama to her dad, the liberals media have gotten stupid with these comparisons.
Give me a break!
Especially since Kennedy and Obama are not all that similiar except that the Dems want to make them the next residnets of Camelot.
Even Caroline was to young to remember her father..her memories are mostyly what she had been told by her family and from others that idolized him!
Mrs. Obama has her own style, here is no need to compare her with Mrs. Kennedy. This is not the Camelot Version we are revisiting. Barack Obama married Michelle because he loved her and not to be just the correct stylish object by his side. This man we have in office is honorable and will be faithful to his wife, his children and his country. ‘Nough said!
Deborah, Joy Behar has said that "she’s not big on politics" she told this to Ann Coutler on an interview a few weeks ago on Larry King show.
But liberals are starting to see that Obama doesn’t have a clue what he’s doing in the White House.
PS. Michelle Obama has no style at all!