Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Jane Wagner | 07/10/2008 12:00 am

Jane Wagner Thinks With Her Heart

Jane Wagner
I could never say "never" for there are always special cases where this could be wonderfully positive. I can think of many 70-year-old women for whom this would be a blessing, not only for them, but for the children. Yes, we do have an overpopulation problem, but most likely it would rarely be utilized. Anyway, my heart — not my head — rules here. I say yes, the treatment should be available.

7 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Juanita Ward
That is good, But I’m all for it, but at the age of 60 I say no way, I have grandchildren, when I get tired of them I send them home. But if I, would have a baby now who will I have to send (him or her) baby too?
By Juanita Ward on 07/10/2008 10:58 am
Amber Swaney
I think if they want it then sure…but how many woman of that age are really looking to have a baby?
By Amber Swaney on 07/10/2008 3:53 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Oh, crap, Jane, must you insist on being reasonable, intelligent, and fair-minded, fer chrissakes????
By Mugsy Peabody on 07/10/2008 6:23 pm
Maggi D
Mugsy - been a tough day - thanks for the smile and I totally agree with you. I think Jane’s heart is bigger than most.
By Maggi D on 07/10/2008 11:12 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Yeah, probably roughly the size of Connecticut…
By Mugsy Peabody on 07/11/2008 12:01 am
shana (shey) loraine
This is an interesting topic - I’m only 31 (never been pregnate. Thank goshd!) and I could never have a kid. First of all, I have a low pain tolerance. And I hate hospitals and needles. Oh gosh, terrified of them! So, you don’t have to worry about me 30 years from now - Carrie(my wife) had Daniel 12 years ago (from a previous marriage.) Most (if not all) of our friends are 55+. Carrie and I love the company, the wisdom and the friendship is real, not, you know…fake and stupid! Okay, back to the topic here. My manager/agent Elena is 59 and has never been married or had kids, so what does she do? She has pretty much adopted Carrie and I as her kids and Dan as her grandson! It’s wonderful! So, you know what ever works for people, that’s what I think. However, in my mind - I can’t even imagine someone like my mom at 71 wanting to have another kid, even if she still looks 55. Yikes! Oh well, If those who want to have kids - even late in the game - go for it! Heck, if we start to run out of room on earth, send them out here to the Californian desert. We have lots of room! Tootles! - Shey
By shana (shey) loraine on 07/14/2008 3:21 am
Kryssi K
I am pretty much in agreement here - I don’t see why not. I know several post-menopausal women who would make AMAZING mothers that the world, quite frankly, lacks and NEEDS. These are women who would not only make great mothers, but in a sense already are great mothers, and who regret never having children. In fact, if more people were raised by 60, 65, 70-year-olds, with the wisdom that inevitably comes with such age, I guarantee there wouldn’t be so much ugliness in the world. Then again, there’s the issue of many of these children eventually not knowing their mothers for as long as they probably should. (Wow, was I a Libra in a past life?!)
By Kryssi K on 07/15/2008 3:56 am