Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Joan Ganz Cooney | 05/12/2008 4:43 pm

Joan Cooney: It's Something I'd Expect From Karl Rove but Not Hillary Supporters

Joan Ganz Cooney

I’d like to add my two bits to the question Cokie and Lesley addressed about whether Hillary’s campaign is playing the race card in its desperate effort to win the nomination.

Click here to read Cokie Roberts on the Chances of an Obama-Hillary Ticket.

Click here to read Cokie Roberts: ‘Hillary Is Negotiating Her Withdrawal.’

I don’t think the campaign is race-baiting but it certainly means to draw attention to Obama’s skin color. One of her prominent supporters took me aside recently at a dinner party to whisper to me urgently, while gripping my arm tightly, "You do understand, don’t you, that he can’t win. He cannot win." I’m not accusing him of being a racist but her supporters and she certainly remind us as often as possible that we live in a country with a long history of prejudice against black people. It is, if nothing else, unattractive and particularly so when it is all within the Democratic Party. It is something I would expect from Karl Rove but not Hillary supporters.

Cokie also implied that sexism has been rampant where Hillary’s concerned. Maybe I’m insensitive but I certainly haven’t heard anyone in the Obama camp nor in the Democratic Party for that matter say that a woman can’t win the presidency. The reason Hillary didn’t lock up the nomination quickly was because she underestimated the desire for change within the party and had no plan B after she failed to lock it up Super Tuesday. No question that a lot of people, particularly on the Republican side, dislike her for a whole variety of reasons. One of those reasons, no doubt, is that they don’t like ambitious women who seek power.

And yes, they are sexists. However, given that she started out with a huge lead in the polls, it’s hard for me to believe that sexism played much of a role in her current situation.

 

Related Headlines

Everything I Hate About Myself I See in Hillary, by Judy Bachrach

Who Stands to Gain the Most in Indiana and North Carolina: Clinton, Obama or the Republicans? by Lesley Stahl

wOw’s Views on the News: Will Pinocchio be the Next U.S. President?

Marlo Thomas: The Media Steals Our Chances of a Fair Election

wOw’s Views on the News: Is Rev. Wright Leading to the Demise of the Obama Campaign?

wOw’s Views on the News: Is It Time for Clinton or Obama to Throw in the Towel?

Poll: Did Sen. Obama Clinch the Democratic nomination last night?

 

76 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Corinne M.
I don’t think the campaign is race-baiting but it certainly means to draw attention to Obama’s skin color.” Joan, did it ever occur to you that the supporter was making a point about Obama’s inexperience? Naturally the lowest common denominator is appealing but he is a far less experienced individual than you’ve been led to believe. Since his election to the US Senate in 2004, he has spent probably more time campaigning for president than legislating as a senator. If you can find substantive proof of leadership in the US Senate, I suggest you put it on the table for consideration. And the race-baiting campaign? It’s not Hillary’s, it’s Obama’s. His campaign has consistently played the race card and put the blame on Hillary. Not only were these charges false, they were deliberately manufactured and then promoted by a compliant press corps. It’s a fraud that is being perpetuated by a supposedly uplifting campaign. Read and learn how race has been manipulated by a candidate who knows only how to play using a scorched earth strategy: http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=aa0cd21b-0ff2-4329-88a1-69c6c2…
By Corinne M. on 05/12/2008 7:28 pm
ariadne a
corrine as i posted elsewhere on this site: there was no talk of race and no playing the race card in iowa. obama and his campaign knew from the git go that this was NOT the way to win friends and influence people. when bill saw the iowa blow out he played the race card in ‘subtle, nuanced verbiage’ that would resonate with the blacks and create a firestorm. he took this theme on the road to south carolina trying to diminish the effects of hillary’s loss with whites, he then whipped out his crayons and painted obama black, ya know, just like good old jesse jackson. the msm goes on about all the faux pas bill makes… these are not mistakes, bill clinton knew just what he was doing. the clintons are not racists but they are not above playing the race card in order to win.
By ariadne a on 05/12/2008 7:41 pm
Alessan O
Black people voted for Obama in SC, the same reason they voted for Jessie Jackson, he is black. You can spin it anyway you want. With a Senator that was voted for over and over again to the Senate in SC by mostly whites, and the terrible way the decendents of slaves have been treated even after the civil rights amendment, has been disgusting, so of course they would vote for first face that looks like them with hopes that things will be different for them, with a black man at the helm.
By Alessan O on 05/12/2008 10:12 pm
Renata
This is a vast over-simplification and one which has COST HRC the Nomination. May John McCain mis-read and balkanize the American people in this same manner! PLEASE!
By Renata on 05/12/2008 11:22 pm
ariadne a
i copied this somewhere, don’t remember where. the women were questioning obamas position on womens issues and this was the response from reality check. these are only the things he has accomplished regarding womans issues, not all of the legislation in his entire career as a senator of il and the us senate. Obama and Womens’ Issues~ From ‘RH Reality Check’: “Throughout his career, Senator Obama has consistently championed a woman’s right to choose, earning him 100% ratings from pro-choice groups during his tenure in the Illinois State Senate and the United States Senate. In 2005, he was the honorary chair of Planned Parenthood of Chicago Area’s Roe v. Wade celebration. And he has not shied away from tough battles. In the Illinois State Senate, Obama worked hand-in-hand with advocacy groups to protect women’s reproductive health. And just last year, Obama was the only U.S. Senator who supported a fundraising initiative to defeat a proposed abortion ban in South Dakota. And Senator Obama was the only presidential candidate to weigh in on the controversy surrounding the opening of the Planned Parenthood clinic in Aurora. If elected president, Senator Obama would overturn the global gag rule and reinstate funding for UNFPA. elsewhere: he has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice and will make preserving women’s rights under Roe v. Wade a priority as President. He opposes any constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in that case. Obama introduced legislation to combat domestic violence by providing $25 million a year for partnerships between domestic violence prevention organizations and fatherhood or marriage programs. Senator Obama co-sponsored and helped reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act. Signed into law in January 2006, the bill funds and helps communities, nonprofit organizations, and police combat domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. The legislation establishes a sexual assault services program and provides education grants to prevent domestic violence. Barack Obama introduced legislation to increase child support enforcement by an additional $4.9 billion over 10 years, a measure that will collect nearly $20 billion in payments from men who don’t fulfill their parental responsibilities. The bill also makes sure that states pass through 100 percent of collected child support payments to families. Obama will fight to protect Title IX and make sure women have equal educational opportunities from pre-kindergarten through college. Obama is an original co-sponsor of Johanna’s Law, which will educate women and increase awareness of ovarian cancer, and has supported efforts to combat breast cancer. He helped pass legislation in the Illinois State Senate to expand insurance coverage for mammograms. Barack Obama has fought to maintain funding for the Centers of Excellence in Women’s Health at the Department of Health and Human Services. He also supports legislation to encourage research that will examine gender and health disparities. The same legislation would establish community outreach programs in underserved areas to help women access health care and maintain healthy lifestyles. Barack Obama believes the government needs to better enforce the Equal Pay Act, fight job discrimination, and improve child care options and family medical leave to give women equal footing in the workplace. Obama also introduced legislation to fight homelessness among veterans, with a special focus on treating women who may have been victims of sexual trauma. Along with Senator Claire McCaskill, Obama has also co-sponsored legislation to provide funding for additional caseworkers and mental health counselors, a women’s mental health treatment program, and a comprehensive mental health study of returning soldiers.
By ariadne a on 05/12/2008 7:58 pm
Alessan O
These are all issues important to Democrats who want a Democratic administration to replace the present neo-con republican administration. GW has been the worst President to ever occupy the White House. Obama did not sucessfully do anything yet, in spite of efforts you stated. It would be great if the establishment (DC insiders) that are putting him in the White House, and the republicans who still have a lot to to say about Roe Vs Wade for example,would work with him, most Senators voting to confirm both Roberts and ‘Alito, rendering us with extreme conversative court with Roe Vs Wade at risk. I don’t know if Obama voted to confirm these two, it doesn’t matter now, because they are serving now, for a life time. But what was the purpose of the long rant praising Obama, you haven’t convinced me he is qualified at all.
By Alessan O on 05/12/2008 10:56 pm
Renata
I am not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am voicing my own opinions, in my own identity and ethnicity — and providing an alternative perspective that most African-Amercians will not/do not. I do not insult anyone or question anyone’s right to voice their opinions. I don’t question anyone’s motives or expect anyone to accept my opinions. It is not my job to convince anyone. It is my right to speak/write my own analyses based upon an experience most on this site — to my mind — don’t necessarily have. Finally, I learn plenty by participation on this site — about HRC supporters, which is valuable. For instance, when I post it is called “ranting.” That is most helpful. It is always good to do opposition research — rather than mock/dismiss the opposition. HRC is losing because, rather than make an effort to listen/understand the zeitgeist — she mocked/dismissed others in a simplistic way, not realizing that it was SHE who was being left behind instead of visa versa. Barack Obama LISTENS to all perspectives — as those of us who wish to thrive/survive the 21st Century must — if we or our business interests are to have RELEVANCY and MEANING. It is very easy to become irrevelant in the modern, digital world — no matter WHO you are, as HRC and Bill Clinton have found out. The ship sailed and they didn’t KNOW it. Their BRAND —and the Republican BRAND is dated. Hope that answers your question re my “rant” prasing Senator Obama.
By Renata on 05/13/2008 1:12 am
Renata
I think the more accurate statement would be I am VALIDATING Barack Obama…on a site where HRC supporters and Republicans could use an alternative perspective. I can, however, understand why some might feel I am praising him. Nor do I expect the demo target of the WoW audience would change their fixed opinions and understandable commitment to Hillary Clinton. I am VALIDATING Barack Obama in HRC and Republican territory — in my own authentic African-American, boomer woman voice, which you will NOT often hear. You will get the appearance of it, the sensibility of it — filtered to accomodate. If I were to post in that “voice” then this site would be no different than any other dying traditional media distribution channel being challenged by…you guessed it…websites/digital properties where AUTHENTIC VOICES and unfiltered/packaged content is delivered. We’ll see.
By Renata on 05/13/2008 1:24 am
Star Lawrence
ONE long rant? ONE?
By Star Lawrence on 05/13/2008 2:31 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Star, on the “Negotiating Withdrawal” thread, Renata and Suzanne posted 32% of all posts, which of course is not 32% of all words, since their posts are long ones.
By Mugsy Peabody on 05/13/2008 7:53 pm
zut alors
Mugsy—maybe call a cop
By zut alors on 05/14/2008 3:37 am
immoddesta godessa
Absolutely spot on re education! Today I spoke with the wife of the head of Mercy corps international! they are the largest relief agency remaining in IRAQ. I mentioned my conflict with Wm Buckley and th 1984 Ethiopian famine. Buckley , cool as he was on the air, was a very rabid racist! So his tepid suggestion that feeding and caring for the suffering masses merely prolonged and or exacerbated the further pains of the poor”! Typicall of the right to disregard the education and empowerment of women. Birth control, jurisprudence in the case of rape incest and abuse, NO! NO! NO! That would fly in the face of the Catholic church, and Wall st. It’s still about caring enough to give assistance, and following up with education and physical support! Here we seem to find ourselves again , but this time the constitutionand common liberties are in crisis, and while Hill and Bill understand these problems facing us , I feel they have here to fore been in the position and have given Bush on both sides of their watch a pass ! Barack no doubt has his work cut out for him!!!!!, but HE IS NOT ALONE!!!!
By immoddesta godessa on 05/13/2008 1:38 am
Renata
I have heard this premise before. It is really very clever and the ultimate in race-baiting, which frees the real practitioners from responsibility for playing it…by blaming the target…for waking up in the moring and being African-American. So, because we wake up in the morning and are African-American, we are, by default — RACE-BAITING the majority population. Clever. This must be the Northern version of the “Southern Strategy.” I like it. It is very smooth. Always appreciate excellence — and this takes PR spin into high art. Maybe Mark Penn really earned his BIG FEES by introducing a new way for racists to practice their art w/out the burden of RESPONSIBILITY — and blame the victim.
By Renata on 05/12/2008 8:26 pm
Renata
The SEXIST version of this premise is asking what a woman had on when she was RAPED. Turn the page, America.
By Renata on 05/12/2008 8:27 pm
Mugsy Peabody
In just what alternate universe does anyone need to call attention to the color of Sen. Obama’s skin? Good lord. Renata goes on and on and on about how Sen. Clinton isn’t a good New York State Senator. Why not ask the people of Illinois what they think about their absentee senator, the one who seems not to have the time to show up for his roll-calls? Can we say what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander at any point? The people I know in Illinois tell me they’ll never vote for him again because he’s totally uninterested in being Senator from Illinois.
By Mugsy Peabody on 05/12/2008 11:35 pm