Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Joan Ganz Cooney | 09/16/2008 2:00 pm

Joan Ganz Cooney on the Real Reason Obama Didn't Choose Hillary

Joan Ganz Cooney

I’ve been reading a lot of complaints that Obama did not choose Hillary as his vice president. And I have been moaning about it for days. I spoke yesterday with someone who knows a lot about it all who told me that Hillary was high on the list but the vettters couldn’t get past Bill’s very complicated philanthropy and business life because the two were so closely tied together. It was almost impossible to know where business stopped and philanthropy began. And of course a lot of foreign governments had donated to his library and other entities with which he was involved which would have become another story.   

What they faced when considering her was that the press (it was rumored and was probably so that the Times had five reporters ready to go) would have a field day investigating Bill’s very complicated financial history. And what they became certain of was that Bill would become the story day after day and week after week and that they would never be able to get back on message. This all rings true, so I think those of us who support Obama should try to be happy with Joe Biden.

192 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Obama Biden
answer me this….then why are the cycles ALWAYS GOOD when the DEMOCRATES are in office?……………..never mind answer is in the sentence I just typed!!…lol………..POINT
By Obama Biden on 09/21/2008 10:11 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
We had an internet boom because John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson’s administrations had a huge amount going into research in computers and electronics in the sixties, that launched ARPA which became the internet, and which also gave rise to personal computers. Al Gore also authored legislation that set up the internet as we know it. [High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991 (commonly referred to as “The Gore Bill”)] Governments have a role to play in economics, and in my view, Democrats have played it better than Republicans. Look at all the anti-science fervor in the current administration. Look at the market crashing, as a direct result of regulation being withdrawn from markets that needed regulation to function correctly.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 09/17/2008 12:41 am
Bonita Caracciolo
Elizabeth, great reply. Thought-provoking. Or maybe just prodding. We really need to think seriously about where “we the people” are today. Collectively, like a gigantic organism because we certainly could be described that way. This cannot and should not be about personalities. Those of you having a nice grasp of our history have helped me to catch up some. I think it was George Santayana that said the thing about not learning from history and having to repeat it. When are we going to wise up? Just as we prosper together, we will fall together. There’s just no way around it.
By Bonita Caracciolo on 09/18/2008 7:10 pm
Bonita Caracciolo
Yeah, and Al Gore invented it! :)
By Bonita Caracciolo on 09/17/2008 9:32 pm
Emcye Edwards
The truth is that neither Hillary or Bill Clinton could have survived the VP vetting process. The reason we’re just discussing this NOW is wholly due to graciousness on the side of Obama - and his Confucian campaign strategy. Many women’s didn’t get it. And all the divisiveness over Hillary’s not being “selected” was jumped on, exploited with the choice of Palin. McCain, by contrast, persists in being intentionally wrong, denying his VP’s corruption, and trawling the gutter on his opponent. The end justifies the means. A nation divided is easily conquered by thieves. The question remains: Can Confucius take Machiavelli in the digital age? Obama is not willing to cross certain lines, but will he capitulate to those who will? Lately, I’m frustrated. He seems quieted by McCain’s tactics and traductions. But in this campaign, with all of democracy at stake, he has no choice but to steady himself between opposing sides and reduce the chance of more conflict. Perhaps voters will decide that Obama’s attributes throughout this trial by ordeal best qualify him for the job. In the meantime, WE should resist McCain’s tactics - not take the bait. Because it’s time to see more than campaign strategy. It’s time for clear and definite strokes in the reclamation of the country, divided by our enemies within. Guide them by virtue…and they wil reform themselves.
By Emcye Edwards on 09/16/2008 2:58 pm
Buh- Bye
Emcye, that avatar freaks me out. :)
By Buh- Bye on 09/16/2008 9:42 pm
Emcye Edwards
Okay - is this better?
By Emcye Edwards on 09/17/2008 2:21 am
Bonita Caracciolo
Emcye, I’m a couple of days behind but I gotta tell ya, that is the most hilarious thing I’ve seen since…it made me laugh when I first saw it and I totally forgot to say anything. You never got a response one way or the other from My Alias, did you? She’s probably having another cocktail right now!
By Bonita Caracciolo on 09/18/2008 7:12 pm
Sharon Belko
Emcye - I only wish your letter/posting could be in every major newspaper, TV station, radio outlet and any other news media throughout all 50 states!! You were spot-on as the British like to say - and I could not agree with you more. Very scary time out there and those of us who think like you do have GOT to do all we can to minimize the McCain/Palin policies/tactics so that this country can get a chance to get back on track!
By Sharon Belko on 09/17/2008 11:08 am
MaryPage Drake
I believe you and agree with you, Joan Cooney. While I voted for Hillary here in the Maryland primary, which she lost, I did so out of loyalty to her while deploring her desire to run. I honestly believe this country and the democratic party are best served if Hillary keeps to jobs where she can be 100% herself, and Bill Clinton will be pushed far to the background. I thought him a brilliant president, but still freeze up in horror over the way his last years, which could have added up to so much, were diminished by his personal behavior. Add to that the fact that as long as he lives he will attract vitriolic, foaming-at-the-mouth hatred attacks from the right, well, Hillary and we are better off with her as Senator and, if we’re lucky, later as justice on the Supreme Court.
By MaryPage Drake on 09/16/2008 3:21 pm
dolores swett
i can’t buy that explanation and even if it were true mccain won the day by picking sarah. what a sad solution. and i heard it was michelle who didn’t want hillary around. i am still so devastated and don’t even care anymore who wins. either way it won’t be good for america.
By dolores swett on 09/16/2008 4:08 pm
Deni G
Oh please with that nonsense about Michelle! It is the McCain campaign that treats this election like a bad sitcom. Their ads run like B movie trailers and their rhetoric is all sensationalism and lies, stretched beyond the breaking point. Obama is exactly what America needs.
By Deni G on 09/16/2008 4:20 pm
DeBúrca obj
You “heard”?? That is called smear… just stating something you “heard” with nothing to back it up. Have you heard that McCain has 134 lobbyists running his campaign? That’s a fact, I didn’t just “hear” it. Just google “McCain 134 lobbyists” and you can read about it.
By DeBúrca obj on 09/16/2008 4:26 pm
DeBúrca obj
This makes perfect sense, in fact this is why Hillary refused to be vetted. People need to stop calling Obama “a jerk” for not choosing Hillary Clinton. If Obama has proven anything during this past campaign that he has organized so brilliantly, he is anything but a jerk and he is NOT “vindictive” as some others in here have said, projecting their own emotions on to him. If Obama had had information indicating that Hillary would have been a help to the ticket he WOULD have chosen her. In fact, all the Clinton supporters who have been in here ripping him apart should at least acknowledge that he took the high road and did not disclose this information about why he couldn’t choose Hillary Clinton and instead is being second guessed by people who do not have all the information. Folks, think about it… Obama chose someone equipped to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. McCain did not. Obama put country first. McCain did not.
By DeBúrca obj on 09/16/2008 4:23 pm
Meg Umans
Thank you, DeBúrca. Obama had reasons for not choosing Clinton, and he was, and is, ethical enough not to tell us what they were. McCain et all had multitudes of reasons not to choose Palin. As you said, McCain didn’t put the country first.
By Meg Umans on 09/16/2008 5:20 pm