Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Joan Ganz Cooney | 11/07/2008 9:50 am

Joan Ganz Cooney: Palin No Victim of Sexism

Joan Ganz Cooney
I’d like to discuss the charges of sexism that were hurled almost every time a Palin supporter talked about her. Well, how convenient, as the church lady would say.

May we review the record? Can anyone imagine a male politician introducing himself to the nation as a soccer dad, carrying his special-needs infant on his shoulder and trotting out his pregnant teenage daughter to show what a loving father and family man he is? Palin has, from the beginning, presented herself with great pride as a sexy, winking, hard-edged woman with a capital W. So yes, comments bordering on sexism have certainly been made. But what, pray tell, did Dan Quayle — who was nearly crucified by the press — and others have to hide behind? He had no -ism at his disposal to use to rationalize away his missteps. He just had to take the criticism personally — like a man, you might say.

Can anybody recall Margaret Thatcher or Angela Merkel calling their critics sexist? Yet both of them must have encountered plenty of sexism while climbing up the political ladder. But whining was not their thing or that of their supporters. One of the ironies is that white men who have never supported any feminist cause and who certainly opposed the E.R.A. and who are proudly anti-choice are the ones who have hurled the charge most frequently and loudly.

I wish I could welcome this crowd to the cause of feminism but something tells me that they will not prove to be reliable allies.

67 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Jennifer Dooley
Wine Warrior, Thank you for saying it like it is!!!
By Jennifer Dooley on 11/07/2008 11:42 am
Dona Howlett
Wine Warrior, Well there you go again………..taking the words right out of my mouth. Except you always do it better than I can. I’m really sick of this woman………..I’d think the media could find other more interesting things to write and talk about.
By Dona Howlett on 11/13/2008 11:08 am
Tee Zee
Thank you Joan, Kelly and Garden Goddess and the many women on site for your words and incredible insight!
By Tee Zee on 11/07/2008 12:24 pm
Patty E
Ditto! This whole thing has been more of a DRAMA , with Palin and McCain, than a campaign for President of the U.S. And quite frankly, this bunch of attention given to ‘Ms. Victim’ , ie Palin, is working my nerve . It is OVER! She was not qualified to begin with…She allowed herself to be ‘used’ ….She made her own rules…She campaigned ‘her way’…..she is responsible for her contributions, as well….she apparently needs the attention…sees herself as ‘the queen bee’. She needs to accept that about herself, learn from it, change what doesn’t work to fulfill her goals, and move on…….
By Patty E on 11/07/2008 1:33 pm
mary lou s
mccain used palin, and she used him back. end of story.
By mary lou s on 11/08/2008 10:49 pm
Marina B.
Mary Lou, yours is the most cogent and concise summary I’ve read.
By Marina B. on 11/11/2008 4:54 pm
Sandbee (FB) 54
They are saying that with the crazy senate election for Stevens ( guilty of felonies) Palin could end up taking over his seat there. We have not heard the last of her, you betcha.
By Sandbee (FB) 54 on 11/07/2008 12:31 pm
Candis Malone
That is a scary thought - but I also have a question if anyone can answer - one cannot vote if convicted of a felony - how is it that one can hold office if convicted?
By Candis Malone on 11/07/2008 2:04 pm
Sandbee (FB) 54
Good question. I think that is why she has the possiblity of filling out his term. But why they were allowed to vote for him I don’t understand.
By Sandbee (FB) 54 on 11/07/2008 4:48 pm
Kathrine Gluvna
Candis, Unbelievably, there is no rule in Congress that a convicted felon may not serve.
By Kathrine Gluvna on 11/07/2008 5:19 pm
E .
Joan - if only you’d allow your argument to progress to the next logical step you’ll find the fertile rationale into which those “white men who have hurled the charge most frequently and loudly” have cultivated their arguments in support of Gov. Palin shored up through charges of sexism committed against her. Was she qualified to be our VP? No. Was sexism used against her? Yes and the fact that it was not put down at every turn allowed her supporters to highlight it and proclaim that the arguments against her were unfair. Naturally Dan Quayle and other powerful white men like him don’t have any ism’s to hide behind - they NEVER had to deal with any ism’s/hatred/buffoonery/cheap-shots, they had only to show up with their well-connected white male I’s dotted and T’s crossed - if only it were so simple for everyone. There were loads of sexist cheap shots taken at Gov. Palin even HERE at wOw - the sexist junk only served to provide the fuel for the smoke and mirrors act. Those “white men who never supported a feminine cause”? … GOP supporters who make it their business to play smoke and mirrors act for all it is worth. You can’t really blame them for doing their job. The hate needs to stop. Just as racism used to subvert any candidate (whether they are good OR bad) should be called out and put down - so should sexism. Sexism is hate and needs to be recognized as such, highlighted at every turn and put down. Until then we are all kept vulnerable to deception and weakened by it. It confused the issues in this campaign to the point that many people were invested in it. You might stop to wonder why you seem more aggravated by the support that Sarah Palin received by the GOP henchmen who are paid to do it than you are at the sexism itself aimed at her, Hillary Clinton, Margarer Thatcher and most other women.
By E . on 11/07/2008 1:29 pm
Wine Warrior
Women do not get a pass because they are women. If they step up to the plate they better have the goods. Palin doesn’t in the least. I think many cry ‘sexism’ when people describe what they are seeing. Calling Palin an hillibilly idiot isn’t sexist or hate, it’s a fact.
By Wine Warrior on 11/07/2008 2:50 pm
Barbara Taylor
Oh, chill out and have a glass of wine.
By Barbara Taylor on 11/07/2008 3:49 pm
DeBúrca obj
Palin was a victim of unqualified-ism, undereducated-for-the-job-ism, petty-sarcasm-ism, and uninformed-ism. I have been a female all my life and I can spot sexism the second I see it, as well as, spot a woman who is a fake. There was no sexism except the sexism that put her in the position of VP nominee to a 72 year old 4 time cancer survivor.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/07/2008 5:06 pm
Melanie Waldrop
It was jaded sexism that placed Sarah Palin in the position she was in! The boys in the Republican party thought that more liberal women would support Palin simply because she is a woman—after all, we ARE women, we don’t put any kind of thought into our actions, nor do we possess any understanding of important issues, according to their ilk. They surmised that more conservative women would find her appaeling because she is a mother. Such men, themselves, thought of Palin as being “hot” (I had to endure a whole lunchtime at work oneday hearing how HOT my male Republican coworkers found her to be)—she could look pretty and keep her mouth shut ( turns out that SHE SHOULD have kept her mouth closed, and not exposed her glaring lack of knowledge and intellect) just like a good girl should! Stupid is as stupid does, and it didn’t take too long for the miscalculations of the Republican big boys to become evident…Sarah soon exposed herself as having ignorance of “Dan Quayleian proportions”…and we all remember what a poor choice THAT was on the part of the Republican party! Joan is dead-on about Palin, as are most of the posters above. When we are fortunate enough to have a woman in the Chjef Executive’s office, she needs to be a person of intellect and substance, who can think on her feet, and who is assertive enough to not only move policy forward, but have self-evident strength and certainty. Although Palin was only nominated for Vice President, she would have been first in line for the office behind the oldest President ever, if the Republican ticket had won. She has NONE of the qualities I mentioned above. Had she ever become President she would have set back women’s rights, as well as women’s chances to hold higher office,back immeasurably!
By Melanie Waldrop on 11/07/2008 2:52 pm