Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 07/24/2008 1:15 pm

Why Is the Mainstream Media Keeping John Edwards's Alleged Love Affair a Secret?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
John Edwards
© AP
Over the past 24 hours, Internet news sites have been reporting on this week’s explosive National Enquirer story exposing a supposed John Edwards tryst in a Hollywood hotel.

However, with the exception of the Los Angeles Times, a blog from The Washington Post online and cable TV’s Headline News’s Glenn Beck, few of the mainstream media outlets are touching this story.

One Internet outlet, Slate Magazine is also asking the question, poking fun at the media for not covering it and making a direct comparison to the mainstream media frenzy around Senator Larry Craig’s bathroom antics of a couple of months ago. Slate writes:

"So why hasn’t the press commented on the story yet? Is it because it broke too late yesterday afternoon, and news organizations want to investigate it for themselves before writing about it? Or are they observing a double standard that says homo-hypocrisy is indefensible but that hetero-hypocrisy deserves an automatic bye?"

The Huffington Post thinks that Edwards just isn’t prominent enough of a figure anymore for the public to care:

"It sure looks like Edwards is a hypocrite who misrepresented himself by showcasing his wife and kids so prominently in the campaign. But his campaign was unsuccessful. Voters didn’t buy his arguments or his life story as reasons to elect him. In short, nobody cares about this now, except as celebrity gossip. And that’s how it’s going to play when the media picks it up, as it probably will.

"The better question is, should the media have gone after this story more aggressively back during the campaign? Sounds like the answer is yes."

Tell us: Do you feel cheated by the mainstream media for keeping the alleged John Edwards affair a secret?

194 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Marjorie C.
Deni, “…all the sites reporting the “tryst” are of a rather dubious nature.” I so hope you are correct.
By Marjorie C. on 07/24/2008 2:14 pm
Marjorie C.
Diana, that Deni should be Diana. This is my day for typos. Of course, I won’t ‘preview’, that would make life too simple.
By Marjorie C. on 07/24/2008 2:21 pm
mary lou s
i was among those who backed edwards for president. this does not take him out of the running for vice president, but it does take him out of the mister perfect category. poor elizabeth edwards!
By mary lou s on 07/24/2008 12:57 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
He has said he does not want to be Vice President. Maybe attorney general. Don’t assume that the stuff the National Enquirer prints is true. They are not exactly the Washington Post. Didn’t Carol Burnett get a libel judgment against them? I cheered when she won that lawsuit. More celebs should sue.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 07/25/2008 6:29 pm
Mugsy Peabody
The National Inquirer? Maybe he’s been sleeping with space aliens with transistors for breasts? What on earth is the matter with you people. The National Inquirer????????!!!!!!!
By Mugsy Peabody on 07/26/2008 12:49 am
Chips AHoey
if all politicians had to meet a morals test before election, we would have anarchy because no one would get elected - I am tired of peeking into the private lives of people who serve the public - I am glad they didn’t run with it during the campaign and I hope they don’t run with it now - I am interested in what an elected official is doing on my time, during the work hours and not what they are doing on their own time…
By Chips AHoey on 07/24/2008 1:12 pm
Carolyn Pugh
Could we please have a fact check before we jump to conclusions? I assume the Wowowow staff has done some checking. I long for the time when people had some privacy and were free to make bad decisions without all of us peeking through their bedroom windows courtesy of ‘National Enquirer’ and its ilk. Most of our great presidents and vice presidents couldn’t have passed today’s scrutiny. cp
By Carolyn Pugh on 07/24/2008 1:23 pm
rocky rocky
Good for you, Carolyn. Ditto!
By rocky rocky on 07/24/2008 3:46 pm
Marjorie C.
Ugh !! I never voted for him because he always struck me as desperate and phony, but I would never have guessed this about him. To use his wife who has been so sick, and his little children as props during his campaign… where does this all end. Do you feel cheated by the mainstream media for keeping the alleged John Edwards affair a secret? Yes, I do. The mainstream media has become so controlling that they’ve become nearly useless as a source of information.
By Marjorie C. on 07/24/2008 1:24 pm
Diana T
Marjorie, Guess what! We agree on something political! I always thought John Edwards was phoney. I always felt that what you see is not what is there. I do not think Obama will select him as VP candidate; who needs that kind of media problem?
By Diana T on 07/24/2008 1:45 pm
Marjorie C.
Diana, Indeed, Obama would be wise to stay away from him. There are many more suitable candidates to choose from.
By Marjorie C. on 07/24/2008 2:18 pm
Diana T
Surely, he will steer clear now of Edwards, Marjorie. Even if the guy is as pure as the driven snow(and I bet he’s not), this would simply be fodder for all the Swift-Boaters, and the mainstream media would just obsess on this instead of the real issues. Indeed, they can barely talk about real issues any more; and we sure don’t need another sexual piccadillo going on and on ad nauseum…
By Diana T on 07/24/2008 4:52 pm
Alessan O
I guess you missed the internet reports about Obama having gay sex, and when the man who reported it, went to DC to talk about his meeting with Obama, without total proof, he was arrested for another matter and put in jail. I don’t know if he is still there, but along with Obama’s cocaine use and aligning himself with a slum landlord, who has been convicted on eight counts, and waiting for sentencings he’s no prize and should not expect perfection in his VP pick, if that was a consideration in the first place. Wake up. ms. majorie.
By Alessan O on 07/25/2008 12:09 am
Marjorie C.
Alessan: Miss Marjorie is awake. I’ve heard of the Obama thing, I’ve just never wanted to be the one to say it. I feel Obama will destroy himself on his own. About the guy in jail, I think he’s out, there was an interview with him.
By Marjorie C. on 07/25/2008 6:48 am
~ countrywoman ~
Alessan O…..”internet reports?”

REPORTS?

Did you mean hateful unfounded e-mail smears and blog gossip? Would you be able to cite a single legitimate source to defend the offensive allegation you have posted here? (And “Oh, I heard that TOO!” does not qualify as documentation, it simply illustrates how scurrilous rumors are spun into pretend facts and perpetuated.)
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 07/25/2008 4:25 pm