Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/15/2008 9:20 am

Judith Regan Blasts Wolff Over New Murdoch Book: 'He's a Repulsive Specimen'

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Judith Regan © AP

Judith Regan may be a thorn in Rupert Murdoch’s side, but that doesn’t mean she’ll help Michael Wolff smear the NewsCorp titan in his new book.

In fact, Regan says she’ll take Wolff to court for referring to her as a “nut” and “reviled figure” in The Man Who Owns the News.

Here’s the background: Regan, fired from NewsCorp’s HarperCollins unit in 2006, settled a lawsuit against the publisher over her dismissal for $10.75 million. She originally wanted $100 million. The former publishing powerhouse sued in November 2007, a year after her plans to publish O.J. Simpson’s If I Did It blew up in her face and helped lead to the end of her reign at HarperCollins. Regan claimed defamation in her lawsuit that NewsCorp asked her to lie to federal investigators about Bernard Kerik, her ex-lover and former New York police commissioner, and tried to destroy her reputation.

Fast forward a bit. Wolff, a Vanity Fair columnist and former college friend of Regan’s, e-mailed Regan after Doubleday signed him to write the Murdoch book. It took a lot of nerve for Wolff to contact Regan asking for her input for the book, since he had already written two particularly nasty profiles of her.

Here’s one, published in Vanity Fair in March 2007, in which Wolff says:

Somehow Judith Regan — the most famous book publisher of her generation, and the would-be Nancy Drew ready to finally close the O. J. Simpson case — has always gotten away with her obscene, grotesque, often funny, Jewish-obsessed, not just politically incorrect but reprehensible, probably slanderous, not necessarily truthful monologues (definitely monologues — she doesn’t really engage in conventional conversation).

Also, her world, on top of being so profitable, is clearly such a harrowing, bleak, sordid place — Hobbesian with a twist of sexual perversity and degradation — that I don’t think anybody wanted to look too closely at it or risk getting drawn into it.

Regan’s response to the New York Daily News:

"Michael Wolff has been obsessed with me and my sex life for close to 30 years. I’m finally going to give him what he wants — he’s going to get [bleeped] by Judith Regan."

Wolff apparently thought that Regan would forget about their rocky past and use his book as an opportunity to lash out at her former employer. 

"Once again, I beseech you: Talk to me," Wolff wrote Regan. "Considering the dreadful things I write about you when you don’t talk to me, it really can’t get any worse by talking to me … Come on, you know how this works. You’re now the NewsCorp whipping girl — so at least put it back to them."

Regan refused, and in the end, Wolff described her in his book as "a nut," "unemployable anywhere else" and "a reviled figure."

Regan then called him “grossly irresponsible,” and “consumed with hatred, vitriol and pathological envy."

She also says of Wolff’s past claim that the two were somehow romantically involved: "He’s having fantasies … He’s a repulsive specimen."

Ouch.

Click here to read the entire Daily News story, with response from Wolff.

2 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Patrice Baldwin
How do these two people, whom I’ve never read nor heard of and couldn’t give a rat’s ass about, get entire conversations about their opinions of each other into print in a variety of places? Why would anyone besides their bosses and the mothers care anyhow? Seems to me it’s a waste of good printers ink.
By Patrice Baldwin on 12/15/2008 4:23 pm
Lady Gator
Patrice — Not too sure their mothers care! Boy what a day on wow — Tom, Idiot Boy Cruise — The 40 yr old with the big boom booms and now this. Good grief ladies of wowowow, surely there is SOMETHING else to talk about. Hey, it’s Christmas — you know Christmas Trees, Jingle bells, dashing through the snow — warm fuzzy feelings — warm mulled cider - pretty presents all wrapped up with bows - Santa Claus and, more importantly, the REAL meaning of Christmas. Give us all a break!
By Lady Gator on 12/15/2008 8:36 pm