Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 08/30/2008 11:06 am

Judy Bachrach: What's Not to Like About Sarah Palin?

EDITOR’S NOTE: Judy Bachrach writes for Vanity Fair, and is the creator of thecheckoutline.org, an online advice column for friends and relatives of the terminally ill.

What’s not to like about Sarah Palin, John McCain’s amazingly original choice as vice presidential material? That’s what I want to know. My husband tells me he likes her a lot because “She looks just like a girl I used to know with lots of great hair and good cheekbones, named Amber.” Which I think says it all.

For instance, when asked whether public school children should learn evolution or what is known in certain circles as “intelligent design,” meaning Darwin was a complete phony, Palin, who is the daughter of a science teacher, replied, “Teach both…and let kids debate both sides.”
I love that line, and not just because I flunked biology sophomore year, and would have appreciated the advocate from Wasilla defending my constitutional right to ignore amoebae.


I think Palin has it exactly right , and am not in the least surprised that back in her days as a Miss Wasilla beauty contestant she won the title of “Miss Congeniality.” In the educational arena, she is certainly very affable. Teach students that doing their homework every night is obligatory – and also that it’s optional – and let kids debate both sides. Tell them that if you divide a number by zero, you’re entitled to come up with all sorts of results. Explain in grammar 101 that the word “class” is a collective noun – or that maybe it isn’t – and let kids debate both sides.


In other words, in her view school is the home of untrammeled democracy. She is educationally pro-choice.


Well perhaps not entirely untrammeled. Perhaps not wholly pro-choice. In the personal arena, as it turns out, Palin is anti-choice. So if a condom breaks, then no, kids shouldn’t be permitted “to debate both sides.”


I don’t know what to say about John McCain and his decision-making abilities. Not long ago, I had to redo my will, and you wouldn’t believe the time spent trying to decide who would be the guardian of our kids in the event we died. Longtime friends, close relatives, lawyers – all these were examined, sifted, rejected, and then re-examined before we made a final selection.


And then there’s John McCain …

79 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

I.M. Kane
John McCain has never taken this election seriously. From the ads about Barack Obama being a celebrity to the Paris Hilton ads to his singing of bomb-bomb Iran, McCain has done all he could to avoid the serious issues this country faces. The selection of Sarah Palin as a running mate is the continuation of McCain’s inside joke, of which we are all the butt of.
By I.M. Kane on 08/30/2008 9:04 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Makes it look even more to me like they’re planning to steal the election somehow, he just doesn’t care. And why should he? That’s pretty scary
By Mugsy Peabody on 08/31/2008 1:01 am
Diana T
You are absolutely correct, IM…we are the butt of McCain’s inside joke, but what are the people who are falling for this? There are people taking this seriously, thinking it’s about the Hillary women, and it isn’t that as much as appeasing the evangelical religious right.
By Diana T on 08/31/2008 1:42 am
Mugsy Peabody
I love you tough women from Kentucky, Diana! Whereabouts, again?
By Mugsy Peabody on 08/31/2008 2:13 am
Diana T
Mugsy, Lexington Ky. Horse Capitol of the World!
By Diana T on 08/31/2008 11:24 am
Mugsy Peabody
Daddy was from Henderson, outside Paducah. Great horse track there.
By Mugsy Peabody on 08/31/2008 12:28 pm
Diana T
My Uncle John lived in Paducah. It has come very far in the past 30 years, and is a very nice place to live now, Mugsy.
By Diana T on 08/31/2008 1:26 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Children need to be properly taught. They should not make decisions about oh, things like intelligent design and whether to give blow jobs at 13 and have sex at 14, you know, how to figure out geometric human population growth, and how to create new energy sources without a good education, and achieving maturity. I don’t mean taught by the “kill and drill” crowd of folks who ignore realities, other peoples rights and needs, or are so absolutely arrogant that they take pride in their ignorance, i.e., “I flunked biology sophomore year, and would have appreciated the advocate from Wasilla defending my constitutional right to ignore amoebae.” By the way, Ms. Bacharach, high school biology is a very easy subject. I wouldn’t brag about being too dumb to pass it publicly.
By Mugsy Peabody on 08/30/2008 10:11 pm
MaryPage Drake
To all Hillary Clinton supporters (and I am one of you): Let’s put Our Gal on the Supreme Court! Vote for Barack Obama! Do you remember back when she was still Hillary Rodham? The American Bar Association listed her as one of the 100 best lawyers in this nation. Come on! Let us put her where she can help us for the rest of her life!
By MaryPage Drake on 08/31/2008 10:46 am
Steve R
To be honest, I think she is more pro-active, and the Supreme Court is more reactive. I cannot see her sitting on the bench waiting for issues to come to her. I would be happy with her on the Supreme Court too, but she needs a driver’s seat.
By Steve R on 09/01/2008 12:28 am
Diana T
I can just hear my husband, Joan. He was a Roosevelt democrat from the Depression era and, as most of his family, was steeped in the history of the time and was very active in the state government here. What you are calling the “ground war”, Bill would have called a (pardon my french) pissing contest. When he found himself in these situations, he would not participate, and he would stick to his great knowledge of history. I am letting his example guide me as we endure this campaign, and I, also will not engage in some of the vitriol that I have seen emitting out of deeply history-challenged people. Harry Truman, as you remember, believed and based a lot of his decisions on history. I think you and I have been around long enough to know that these cycles have to come around again, and if the public does not know or care what can happen, they become very mallieable for the likes of Karl Rove and people like him. You know exactly what I am saying in that sentence. We’ve seen it happen time and again in our human story. Strange to think that this is the 10th anniversary of Bill’s death(9/3), but he still guides me through pivotal times such as these. Let’s entitle this historical period as Rove’s Unilateral Expectations.
By Diana T on 08/31/2008 11:12 am
mary lou s
diana, you said, “Let’s entitle this historical period as Rove’s Unilateral Expectations.” does that mean you RUE the day rove went into politics?
By mary lou s on 09/02/2008 2:31 pm
Ky McQueen
This elections is somewhat a repeat of 2004. This election will come down to Gays, religion, and abortion. I am not voting for those issues. I work for a big corporation, I have watch jobs within my company go overseas while many of my co-workers were laid off and are still unemployed. I am afraid of losing my job every day due to cheap labor overseas. I drive 45 minutes to work everyday and spend $140 dollars a week in gas. My home is almost in foreclosure and I will have to look for a place to live. I work two jobs and barely make ends meet. I have not had a raise in wages in years. I would rather have someone in office that will bring change then have the same 8 years of bull. Palin, scares me because she isn’t a single mom working 2 jobs with low wages…she is married with two decent incomes in her household. She doesn’t know what struggle is…She can’t not related to me. Just because we are women, she doesn’t have a clue about the average working woman. I am a college graduate with experience in my field and I get passed over for people that are unexperienced. I end up training them while they achieve big positions and raises. I care about my friends and family dying in a war that was started on false pretenses. I care about the hurricane that destroyed my grandparents home and barely received assistance from the government. I can care less about someone’s sexually orientation or religion…that isn’t my concern. My concern is how will I and my family survive. I just want to see change…whether it is a black man or not…I want things to change.
By Ky McQueen on 08/31/2008 12:53 pm
Diana T
How interesting your post is, Ky. I saw a columnist write the very same thing in his commentary the other day. Here, in the midst of all the problems we are enduring—economy, war, health care, etc—the election will once again revolve around abortion, gays and religion. I think one of the reasons that the Rove team came up with the Palin nomination was to divert our attention off the problems that you and I have to live with every day. Diversion..cynical, isn’t it. By the way, your first user name is Ky. Any chance you are living in Kentucky??
By Diana T on 09/02/2008 2:59 pm
Sam Mirando
Have any of you ladies read the story on www.dailykos.com about the pregnancy and birth of the child that Ms. Palin calls her own? It is extraordinary, in my view, and, if not true, represents the most amazing set of coincidences and poor obstetric care.
By Sam Mirando on 08/31/2008 1:36 pm