Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 08/30/2008 11:06 am

Judy Bachrach: What's Not to Like About Sarah Palin?

EDITOR’S NOTE: Judy Bachrach writes for Vanity Fair, and is the creator of thecheckoutline.org, an online advice column for friends and relatives of the terminally ill.

What’s not to like about Sarah Palin, John McCain’s amazingly original choice as vice presidential material? That’s what I want to know. My husband tells me he likes her a lot because “She looks just like a girl I used to know with lots of great hair and good cheekbones, named Amber.” Which I think says it all.

For instance, when asked whether public school children should learn evolution or what is known in certain circles as “intelligent design,” meaning Darwin was a complete phony, Palin, who is the daughter of a science teacher, replied, “Teach both…and let kids debate both sides.”
I love that line, and not just because I flunked biology sophomore year, and would have appreciated the advocate from Wasilla defending my constitutional right to ignore amoebae.


I think Palin has it exactly right , and am not in the least surprised that back in her days as a Miss Wasilla beauty contestant she won the title of “Miss Congeniality.” In the educational arena, she is certainly very affable. Teach students that doing their homework every night is obligatory – and also that it’s optional – and let kids debate both sides. Tell them that if you divide a number by zero, you’re entitled to come up with all sorts of results. Explain in grammar 101 that the word “class” is a collective noun – or that maybe it isn’t – and let kids debate both sides.


In other words, in her view school is the home of untrammeled democracy. She is educationally pro-choice.


Well perhaps not entirely untrammeled. Perhaps not wholly pro-choice. In the personal arena, as it turns out, Palin is anti-choice. So if a condom breaks, then no, kids shouldn’t be permitted “to debate both sides.”


I don’t know what to say about John McCain and his decision-making abilities. Not long ago, I had to redo my will, and you wouldn’t believe the time spent trying to decide who would be the guardian of our kids in the event we died. Longtime friends, close relatives, lawyers – all these were examined, sifted, rejected, and then re-examined before we made a final selection.


And then there’s John McCain …

79 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Mugsy Peabody
And probably saner than those of us who find getting through the day without a Peet’s cappuchino impossible to contemplate! Sing on, y’all….
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/02/2008 1:04 am
Gia Granny
Pro Choice, but only on her terms Sarah Palin advocates shooting wolves from planes and wants the polar bear removed from the list of endangered species. I believe that if a candidate puts on the pro choice mantle it should include all life, including protesting the death penalty and all wars. Those lives are less valuable than a fetus? Not to me.
By Gia Granny on 09/04/2008 7:40 pm
Kathy Douglass
Let’s just take a minute to address the practicality of making educators teach both creationism and biology and geology. Most schools don’t have the resources and funding to keep up with the current required classes - where is the time and money going to come from to add another class? How are the teachers going to be trained? Don’t the various religions that do believe in Creationism have a few differences between themselves? Do Catholics believe the exact same thing that Protestants do? I don’t know. I mean really…isn’t this why we have Sunday school and other religious classes taught through our individual churches? Can kids not go 6 hours a day without talking about religion?
By Kathy Douglass on 09/05/2008 10:44 am
eleanor roche
Intelligent design does not imply that “Darwin was a phoney”. ID is not the same as creationism. It is a theory that believes there may be an “intelligent” being/diety/god behind the natural world—that it just doesn’t “happen” , there is an omnipotent source behind it. The ID theory is an effort to empirically detect whether the “apparent design” in nature acknowledged by virtually all biologists—Darwin’s principles included— are the product of an intelligent cause—or is simply the product of undirected processes or randomness. It is basically accepting what we know to be true in science—including natural selection— but saying that there is a higher power behind it possibly “directing” it.
By eleanor roche on 09/05/2008 3:12 pm