Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Julia Reed | 09/09/2008 10:00 am

Julia Reed: From Gloria Steinem to Norah O'Donnell, Misogyny and Sexism Are Fine if the Target (Palin) Is on the Right

Julia Reed

Last week, I was a tad distracted by the hurricane hurtling my way, but I spent my evacuation going between coverage of the storm that was Gustav and the storm that was Sarah Palin (whose speech I watched upon my return to New Orleans at a Magazine Street bar, as we still had no electricity). Now that my power has been restored, the mess that was my yard has been cleaned up (I have the scars to prove it) and New Orleans is out of danger (for the moment), I feel as though I must put in my two cents regarding the response of the media to Sarah Palin, including that of some of my fellow wOwers.

First, let me say that I was appalled by it generally, but I’ll try to dismantle the reaction piece by piece. First, there is the stunning double standard. In an op-ed piece in the Los Angeles Times, Gloria Steinem refers to the “ridicule and misogyny” suffered by Hillary Clinton. Both those words could certainly apply to what Sarah Palin went through last week. Blogs accused her of faking her own pregnancy with a Down syndrome child to cover up for her daughter. Mainstream journalists — female mainstream journalists — like Norah O’Donnell questioned whether a mother of five could effectively function as vice president. More piled on about her irresponsibility in accepting the nomination with five children, including one with special needs. Alan Colmes suggested on his blog that her airplane travel had possibly contributed to the fact that her child was born with Down syndrome. It went on and on and on. Where was the feminist outcry? Plenty of Republican women were sickened over the treatment of Hillary Clinton (hell, even I cried at the video that introduced her convention speech), but there has been no reaching across party lines to defend Palin. Not even when Martin Peretz dismissed and demeaned her by saying, “I give [Palin] her due: she is pretty like a cosmetics saleswoman at Macy’s.” If he had said that about someone who agrees with them on the issues, Steinem et al would have gone crazy. And therein lies the real truth. All the opiners who called the choice “insulting” (including my friend Sally Quinn before her about-face) really meant that it was not a choice that they would have made; she is not a woman who thinks or votes like them, she is pro-life, not pro-choice. (I too am pro-choice, but I respect the choices of other people — especially one, like Palin, who walks her talk.) Apparently only those women are worthy of defending. When so many of the most vocal critics weighed in by calling Palin a “cynical” choice, I had to ask myself, “Who is really being cynical here?”

I don’t know what people think we’re playing here, but this is politics, not checkers. Every veep in history has been chosen for a calculated reason.

Cynical was also the word used by GOP strategist Mike Murphy (who once worked for McCain, but was not asked to join the campaign this go-round) in his off-camera remarks with our fellow wOwer Peggy Noonan. While they discussed (in a conversation both thought was not being recorded) her lack of experience, Murphy termed McCain’s choice as cynical. Others have called it “pandering” to women and “calculating.” Well of course it is, up to a point. If you want the most level-headed and experienced guy in the party, you’d choose Dick Lugar. You might also lose as badly as he did when he gave it a go in 1996. If you wanted an experienced governor, you might go for Tom Ridge, who is another white guy Vietnam Vet. I don’t know what people think we’re playing here, but this is politics, not checkers.

521 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

LorraineBates
(Sigh)….Did you actually read Gloria Stienem’s article? Because if you had, you’d have read where Gloria condemned questioning whether she could do the job because she was a mom, and stuck to the issues. Gloria did exactly what your definition of feminism says.
By LorraineBates on 09/09/2008 9:29 am
NoKillandDrillPalin
Here’s right leaning Time Magazine attacking Palin for what a liar she is on taxes and spending. That Alaska taxes its population at one of the highest rates and its spending is very high too. On what? They have the highest HS dropout rate in the nation. As Time Magazine wrote about Palin “back to reality”: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1839724,00.html
By NoKillandDrillPalin on 09/09/2008 12:55 pm
DianaT
Suzanne, You jumped my line. How funny….I came on to drop the same article into the thread because I was so surprised to see it. This is not Palin bashing, not sexist; it’s just grocery store check-out line numbers and facts. I knew about the highest High School Drop Out Rate; what I did not know is that Palin’s little town also has the highest meth use and cooking in the State. Facts being facts and knowledge is power. How’s the book coming?
By DianaT on 09/09/2008 1:19 pm
NoKillandDrillPalin
Diana- This is good. Deepak Chopra. “Palin is the opposite of Obama. His Shadow.” She reverses 40 years of feminism—Exactly. Obama and the Palin Effect by Deepak Chopra “Sometimes politics has the uncanny effect of mirroring the national psyche even when nobody intended to do that. This is perfectly illustrated by the rousing effect that Gov. Sarah Palin had on the Republican convention in Minneapolis this week. On the surface, she outdoes former Vice President Dan Quayle as an unlikely choice, given her negligent parochial expertise in the complex affairs of governing. Her state of Alaska has less than 700,000 residents, which reduces the job of governor to the scale of running one-tenth of New York City. By comparison, Rudy Giuliani is a towering international figure. Palin’s pluck has been admired, and her forthrightness, but her real appeal goes deeper. She is the reverse of Barack Obama, in essence his shadow, deriding his idealism and turning negativity into a cause for pride. In psychological terms the shadow is that part of the psyche that hides out of sight, countering our aspirations, virtue, and vision with qualities we are ashamed to face: anger, fear, revenge, violence, selfishness, and suspicion of “the other.” For millions of Americans, Obama triggers those feelings, but they don’t want to express them. He is calling for us to reach for our higher selves, and frankly, that stirs up hidden reactions of an unsavory kind. (Just to be perfectly clear, I am not making a verbal play out of the fact that Sen. Obama is black. The shadow is a metaphor widely in use before his arrival on the scene.) I recognize that psychological analysis of politics is usually not welcome by the public, but I believe such a perspective can be helpful here to understand Palin’s message. In her acceptance speech Gov. Palin sent a rousing call to those who want to celebrate their resistance to change and a higher vision Look at what she stands for: Small town values — a nostaligic return to simpler times disguises a denial of America’s global role, a return to petty, small-minded parochialism. Ignorance of world affairs — a repudiation of the need to repair America’s image abroad. Family values — a code for walling out anybody who makes a claim for social justice. Such strangers, being outside the family, don’t need to be needed. Rigid stands on guns and abortion — a scornful repudiation that these issues can be negotiated with those who disagree. Patriotism — the usual fallback in a failed war. ”Reform” — an italicized term, since in addition to cleaning out corruption and excessive spending, one also throws out anyone who doesn’t fit your ideology. Palin reinforces the overall message of the reactionary right, which has been in play since 1980, that social justice is liberal-radical, that minorities and immigrants, being different from “us” pure American types, can be ignored, that progressivism takes too much effort and globalism is a foreign threat. The radical right marches under the banners of “I’m all right, Jack,” and “Why change? Everything’s OK as it is.” The irony, of course, is that Gov. Palin is a woman and a reactionary at the same time. She can add mom to apple pie on her resume, while blithely reversing forty years of feminist progress. The irony is superficial; there are millions of women who stand on the side of conservatism, however obviously they are voting against their own good. The Republicans have won multiple national elections by raising shadow issues based on fear, rejection, hostility to change, and narrow-mindedness Obama’s call for higher ideals in politics can’t be seen in a vacuum. The shadow is real; it was bound to respond. Not just conservatives possess a shadow — we all do. So what comes next is a contest between the two forces of progress and inertia. Will the shadow win again, or has its furtive appeal become exhausted? No one can predict. The best thing about Gov. Palin is that she brought this conflict to light, which makes the upcoming debate honest. It would be a shame to elect another Reagan, whose smiling persona was a stalking horse for the reactionary forces that have brought us to the demoralized state we are in. We deserve to see what we are getting, without disguise.”
By NoKillandDrillPalin on 09/09/2008 4:25 pm
DianaT
Suzanne, thank you. I saw this yesterday, and she said she and her friends are so worried. She lives in the DC area, husband is retired World Bank Director. They are asking one question, What’s it going to take for this nation to wake up and realize what they are doing to themselves? Her neighbors, who are both CIA(covert) are worried sick that McCain will get in and they are appalled at his choice of a running mate.
By DianaT on 09/09/2008 4:41 pm
TickPyne
Dear Suzanne and Diana T., Thank you from the bottom of my heart for being the voice of reason, sanity, clarity and wisdom here. All we can do is stay focused, stay on track and keep fighting back. All they can do is keep slinging their vile hatred, slick, pre-fab, irrelevant sound-bytes, ignorance and underhanded Rovian tactics from the school of Fear & Smear at us. When you don’t have the facts, truth—and history on your side, I guess you grab at whatever you can, settle for smoke and mirrors and hope that the endless repitition of senseless moronic babble will dull the opposition into compliance. Just ask Valerie Plame. Or the Katrina victims, the real ones, not Julia Reed, posturing at us from her gilded cage. And then, of course there’s the war and the economy, thousands dead and thousands everywhere hurting, really hurting financially. And now these inept, destructive, dangerous fools, who have taken the glorious name of America and turned it into a hideous punch-line around the world, alienated our friends and fortified our enemies, want 8 more years to finish what they’ve started and make things even worse? No way. It’s time to throw THOSE toys back.
By TickPyne on 09/13/2008 6:22 pm
DianaT
Erica, I’m doing all I can to see this pattern ended. I was at a play with a friend tonight whose family is in Germany and she was a Polish refugee during WW2. She is in Europe a lot, and was telling me how absolutely befuddled everyone is. In Germany, they did a poll, and Obama had a 98% favorite rating. Everyone is very worried about this election. I was telling someone that I decided to define in 25 words or less why I want Obama to win. I guess the essence of it that somehow in America, our leaders and so much of the population have become stuck on 9/11. I want to move on to 9/12 so that we can get back to what America does best and be a beacon of innovation and optimism for the rest of the world. In all my years of observing elections, this is the most cynical one I have ever been a part of. I am making a list of all the lies, the scandals, the Michael Abramoffs’, the mistakes, the false starts, the missed cues, lost opportunities, the squandered and lost monies that have disappeared in Iraq and here in America, the tortures, the prisons, the arrogances of this failed presidency,the denials of global warming and the refusal to acknowledge our contribution to it. I will do this because I do not believe they should be rewarded for what they have done to this country and our Constitution. I am doing this because I see a country in decline with its ideas and motivation and complacency. I am doing this because I want my grandchildren to have a better world than this. Tucker Eskew is the advisor for Gov. Palin. He was a member of Bushs’ staff. McCain has over 130 lobbyists on his campaign staff. He has supported Bush with his votes over 90% of the time. Please tell me how this represents “change”. Yeah, change for the worse. I want to get young and fresh ideas and inspiration so that we can get a new start and new direction. And, Erica, thank you so much for your note.
By DianaT on 09/14/2008 12:35 am
TickPyne
Are you kidding? You deserve a medal, Suzanne too, wherever she is. And the rest of the tireless, truth-telling cavalry here. We cannot permit ourselves to be distracted by all the tricks and smears and lies and we haven’t been. It’s not easy to be rational when up against a constant barrage of irrational, wholly distorted hypotheses. It takes time and fortitude—and being fully informed at all times, but it’s too important, as you know. We have no choice.
By TickPyne on 09/14/2008 10:46 am
TickPyne
Diana, I wanted to add that I used to live in Amsterdam, still speak to friends there, and like the people you mention in Germany, they are all just flabbergasted at all this. As well as friends in France, Italy and the UK. And they say that these sentiments are expressed daily in all the foreign newspapers they read. I was in Amsterdam when Bush the Lesser was first elected, or whatever that botched fiasco with the Florida Supreme Court was. Everyone I spoke to there at the time thought it was absurd that this, W., was the best America had to offer. But this time, they look at it like science fiction or a horror show, as if Rovian aliens had come here and taken over the whole election process. Obama and Biden they know and trust and feel they have the wisdom and experience to help get America back on track, economically, militarily and in terms of our lost stature in the world. McBush and His Gimmick in Glasses? They just cannot fathom it. I don’t blame them. After all, if a kid worked in the Gap and kept putting the wrong sweaters back on the wrong shelves, would he get 8 more years to prove himself? Of course not. If you worked at Starbuck’s and kept spilling hot coffee on the customers, would you get an 8-year pardon? Not a chance!, and neither should the Republicans.
By TickPyne on 09/14/2008 4:27 pm
Dutch163
very well put,Diana, thanks I have friends in Germany too…one wrote just after Palin’s interview..she used the analogy of the “Emporer’sNew Clothes”..she said..:when is a child going to tell her it had no content” I have never been so actively and emotionally involved in a campaign before…I even made call for Obama this week
By Dutch163 on 09/16/2008 7:30 am
DianaT
Anam, I keep thinking of The Wizard of Oz. You remember, all the fear and threats by the little old man behind the curtains. The business of the spinmeisters, whether it’s advertising soap detergent or politics is to manipulate minds to create need.
By DianaT on 09/16/2008 10:42 am
Dutch163
The Wizard of Oz has been on my mind,too! great minds think alike ! LOL The word that is key in your post, to me, is “manipulate”..and the McCain campaign is using awful tactics to manipulte this election from his choice of VP to the lies in his ads… shame on him, I used to respect him
By Dutch163 on 09/16/2008 4:39 pm
DianaT
All they can talk about, Anam, is oil, no taxes and fear. Our greatness is innovation and we used to be a beacon in the world. We’re going to have to redeem ourselves in the world’s eyes.
By DianaT on 09/16/2008 4:46 pm
gulliverfourmyle
re: Chopra—‘sock-it-to-‘em’, Sir—-i have never fathomed this nation’s Reago-Mania—-he was a huge disaster—-no one here really seems to notice—-Europe (who learned the hard way), most of the ‘common-sense’ world, if you’ve traveled, simply wonder—-‘what is on our minds?’ the very Art of actors is deception of audience—-who would trust such? and this ominous, ‘my country, right or wrong’ is an old story, and never a happy end—-if Mr. Obama may survive? Change is long overdue—-Thank You—-gwf
By gulliverfourmyle on 09/10/2008 10:33 am
DeBrcaobj
The idea that a virtual unknown can be thrust on to the American people the way the McCain camp has thrust Sarah Palin on to us with just a few weeks left of the election and not even allowing her to be interviewed and questioned by the media… and that we are being MEAN ? Hey, these are the ramifications of trying to pull a fast one in the name of political expediency. This idea that the American people and the media should be ashamed of asking these questions and sharing what they find out feels an AWFUL lot like the way the charge of being “un-patriotic” was being thrown around at the American people and the few in the media who were asking questions when we were being pushed into the Iraq invasion and in the early part of the war!
By DeBrcaobj on 09/09/2008 4:48 pm