Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 07/08/2008 9:45 am

Can a Woman Fix What Ails the Washington Post?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Photo courtesy of www.nysocialdiary.com

Yesterday, Katharine Weymouth, the most-watched woman in newspaper publishing today, announced that Marcus Brauchli, the former managing editor of the Wall Street Journal who took a package rather than tangle with the Murdoch machine taking over his newsroom, will become the new executive editor of the Washington Post. In making the selection of an outsider to the Post, Weymouth has set a long-term course for a paper that, like the rest of the newspaper industry, is under assault from the Internet, diminishing advertising and circulation revenue as well as cost increases and environmental concerns. 

In the five short months since Katharine Weymouth assumed the publisher’s spot at her family’s vaunted Washington Post, she has become the highest-ranking woman working at one of the prestige dailies. The granddaughter of the widely respected Katharine Graham, who along with Ben Bradlee steered the paper through its famed Watergate days, Weymouth is taking the reins at a cataclysmic time in the newspaper industry. The media world is watching to see if she will be able to steer the paper and its Internet operations to a kind of profitability that so far has eluded both the scions of old-line newspaper families such as Arthur Sulzberger Jr. at the New York Times as well as cocky newcomers such as real-estate entrepreneur Sam Zell, the new CEO at the Tribune Company, owners of the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times.

For more, see The New York Times’s coverage of the announcement.

22 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Linda Clark
I see that Katharine Weymouth is like most women in business; acutely aware of need to be versatile and willing to facilitate necessary risks. I do not see her decision to bring in an outsider as a bad thing. Fresh is always better than stale. And she’s in charge of the “produce”….so to speak, isn’t she! P.S. Beings how she’s being scrutinized for her choice, I will support her efforts by subscribing to the Post!
By Linda Clark on 07/08/2008 9:17 am
beverly linens
I wish her well, I admired her grandmother greatly. The Washington Post is one of my favorite papers. Who did she replace, her dad?
By beverly linens on 07/08/2008 9:25 am
G T
Hopefully the paper will report the news without the “spin” that so many reporters and editors seem to think is necessary in what should be straight forward reporting of the facts without all the colorful adjectives. There is a place for opinion….on the Editorial page, not in the news items. We have had to leave off our local papers because of the political leanings they have allowed to color their entire paper and now are down to THE WALL STREET JOURNAL and THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR for good old fashioned reporting of truth. TV is no better..its heavily loaded with spin..”Entertainment” sems to be more important that reporting the facts. Gawd, the talking heads are like a babbling brook that never stops and its all speculation..and then pretty soon speculation is being treated as if it were fact.. This little dynamic can lead to a very schizophrenic view of the world and whats going on. I mean by that “split off from reality”… Anyone else notice this? Lets hope one of Americans oldest and best newspapers on the East coast, is benefited by this new direction.
By G T on 07/08/2008 11:00 am
DeBúrca obj
The Wall Street Journal was always considered a conservative paper, long before Rupert Murdock took over. With Murdock’s brand of journalism at the helm I can’t imagine considering it a reliable source of unbiased news. The dumbing down and sensationalizing of our newspapers is a direct result of competition from the airwaves and radiowaves. As far as television news, years ago the media was required to devote a certain amount of non profit airtime to news… actual news… but that was changed and with that change came the absorption of what was once, the news, into the entertainment depts. of the networks. The result was that the news now had to make a profit, and that is how we ended up with no real news sources in this country. That doesn’t even take into account Cable.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/08/2008 1:44 pm
K O
Hi JC, Murdoch once owned the Village Voice—and didn’t disturb its editorial formula during his ownership of that paper. His publishing arm promulgates Howard Zinn’s People’s History of the United States, which has also grown steadily year after year under his ownership, and can hardly be characterized as conservative. I am acquainted with some WSJ journalists and have seen no basis for you to question its objectivity, but if you have any specific examples of its lack of reliability, I’d be interested to know about them.
By K O on 07/08/2008 9:16 pm
Frank Peterson
I surely hope so, Katherine Graham ran incredible newspaper with Ben Bradlee as editor—I just hope that grand-daughter follows her lessons carefully. As for Sam Zell he’s already ruining the LA Times and I’m sure he’ll take the Trib into oblivion too. Zell is a mini-Murdoch and that does not bode well for both papers.
By Frank Peterson on 07/08/2008 11:19 am
Chrome Toe
I can’t remember the last time I read a paper version of a newspaper UNLESS I just happened to be sitting in a coffee shop or restaurant and one was sitting there. Newspapers have to come to accept that they just aren’t competitive anymore. Things change… Newspapers haven’t been the go to genre of the younger generation in a long time. Not that I’m the younger generation. but my point is that now that even my generation rarely looks at a printed version of a paper the old gaurd has to get real. Then television has to come to terms with DVR. Neither have I watched a commercial in about three years. Not one. I can remember when the three networks truly believed that cable was not a threat to their revenue. Like I said… times change.
By Chrome Toe on 07/08/2008 11:47 am
beth willis
Foolish me, when personal computers came out, I thought they would be a passing fad. My husband was gung ho for them, so I asked him what was going to be so great about computers. His response was, “One day you’ll be able to download an entire library into a machine you can carry around, anywhere.” Being an English teacher, my answer was,”Why would anyone want to do that? You mean there will be no more books to curl up with by the fire on a rainy day. Is this Farenheit 451?” “Newspapers,” he says. ” You’ll be able to read any newspaper in the world right at your desk.” “And this is progress? Well, nobodies getting my books,” I counter. Here we are twenty-five years later, and it’s all coming to pass except I still have all my books, by golly. And my husband keeps mumbling about a “human delete” key. Who knows what that is all about. The Washington Post has always been a favorite of mine, but we can never find it anywhere. We’re hoping that when Dubya heads home the entire eastern sea coast will stop punishing our state for Dubya’ pride in “never reading books”. Most of us can and do read; ‘course that statistic will change after January 20, 2009 Peace and grace
By beth willis on 07/08/2008 12:27 pm
Frank Peterson
Beth—go online—all the best and some of the worst newspapers n the world are on line in complete issues. Type in to Washington Post on Google and you are there.
By Frank Peterson on 07/08/2008 12:39 pm
beth willis
Thanks, Frank. I do that with The Times and NYpost, so I will add The Washington Post. Sometimes my thinker just runs out…..nice to have a guide once in a while. Also, I do know that “nobodies” is plural. When what I meant was nobody’s. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 07/08/2008 12:51 pm
Maurine H
Beth - if you go to www.startingpage.com and then to “news” on the categories list, the WP will come up as one of the many newspapers listed. You just have to sign up and then you can start reading it daily. I love this portal website, because it lists international as well as national newspaper websites. Usually, I read through several English language version foreign newspapers as well as through the major U.S. papers. Gives one quite a different perspective. And it keeps me out of trouble!
By Maurine H on 07/08/2008 6:09 pm
beth willis
Thank you so much, Maurine. I’m blessed or cursed with enormous curiosity, always wanting to know what’s going on where. This is going to be fascinating. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 07/08/2008 6:51 pm
K O
I take issue with the part of the question that reads “Yesterday, Katharine Weymouth, the most-watched woman in newspaper publishing today, announced that Marcus Brauchli, the former managing editor of the Wall Street Journal who TOOK A PACKAGE RATHER THAN TANGLE WITH THE MURDOCH MACHING TAKING OVER HIS NEWSROOM,”. Murdoch once owned the Village Voice, and did not interfere with the profitable left wing point of view espoused by its editorial staff. On the other hand, the Wall St. Journal is bloated and badly run. It is profit, not politics that appears to be Murdoch’s primary business motivation, and with that premise, Brauchli’s policies, to the degree they contributed to state of the Wall St. Journal, may also damage The Washington Post. Therefore, based on this particular hiring decision, my answer is “No.”
By K O on 07/08/2008 1:38 pm
Diana T
Kitty, Agreed. You are spot on. It’s not her sex that will make or break the Post. Her grandmother was managing a newspaper among other accomplishments long before “womens lib” was a house hold term The problems of the print news are hitting all of them. Our own local newspaper has shrunk in size not much larger than my highschool newpaper. But, I agree with Charlie Rose. Print news with my morning coffee is a ritual that I don’t plan giving up any time soon!
By Diana T on 07/08/2008 2:02 pm
Linda Clark
When I hear rhetoric from industries “going green” nowadays, I find myself somewhat angered. Are they really committed? I believe the market for “printed press” journalism to remain in tact for quite some time…………there is a certain pleasure (comfort) in holding, folding and clipping from a physical newspaper. On the other side of this coin, I can envision a “truly green” effort as a result of moving over to the electronic age for the newspaper industry. It would indeed be better for the environment to print less. The recycled paper that is currently being used, at one point, came from a real tree.
By Linda Clark on 07/08/2008 1:58 pm