Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Lesley Stahl | 06/12/2008 4:25 pm

Lesley Stahl: Obama Needs a Big, Sexy Relaunch

Lesley Stahl
These are always the summer-doldrums months in a presidential campaign. Things slow down in the heat and humidity. It’s a time when each of the candidates tries to define the other, as in "Bush-2 on Iraq" vs. "Mr. Tax and Spend." Or "Too old" vs. "Too young." But you wonder who’s listening. So I was thinking: How best could Sen. Obama use this time?

First, as Gail Collins suggests in today’s New York Times, he needs to get some sleep. (See my piece on “60 Minutes” about how deeply critical sleep is to judgement, memory and overall health. And yes, this is a plug, because the story will rerun this coming Sunday.) Then, he needs to think of a way to recapture the energy and emotion of the early months of the campaign. He has to find a way to press the reset button with a big, sexy relaunch.

How and where can he do that? This is exactly why God created conventions!

So, here’s an idea: On the final night of his convention when the delegates vote and the country watches (unlike the previous nights), what if Obama had these three people nominate him, in this order:

One: Hillary
Two: Teddy (if he’s up to it) with Caroline Kennedy at his side
Three: Elizabeth Edwards

Think about it! Wouldn’t that energize the Democrats, and turn the anger of Hillary’s followers (assuming it’s still there) into jelly?

Then, of course, he has to give another speech of his life!

What do you think? And who should McCain get to nominate him?

191 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Marjorie C.
sibelle: “…lesser of the two evils because the other one is younger and will last longer?” There ya go!! I hadn’t thought of it that way, but that’s a good approach. Since neither of them is a bargain, might as well go for the one most likely to keel over the first.
By Marjorie C. on 06/15/2008 5:57 am
Star Lawrence
Staying home means not voting for local people and issues. We need max Dems in Congress, for one thing. I am writing in—getting a ballot ahead of time, a paper one.
By Star Lawrence on 06/18/2008 1:16 pm
mary lou s
elizabeth, those are huge things. and don’t forget the supreme court.
By mary lou s on 06/14/2008 2:01 pm
Frannie Em
Marjorie I worked as campaign manager on a local city council election in my area. It was exciting to see that almost 100% of seniors voted. Since they are predominantly on a fixed income, tax issues etc affect them, so they get out and vote. We shall see what happens.
By Frannie Em on 06/14/2008 3:59 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
Frannie Em! You are a political operative! What fun! When I visit my mother at the retirement community where she lives, they ALL vote, no matter how poorly they may feel or how dimly they may regard the candidates. And they all talk politics. She said that so much of their lives, from the depression to World War II to the post war boom, had so much to do with politics, that they just can’t leave it to others who may not understand. I really wish more people would get informed and vote. One of the worst turnout groups consists of single women under forty. How can we get gen x and y and z to vote? Well, register and inform themselves and vote, there are three steps. Anyway, I was amazed at the conversation at that retirement community in 2004; they thought Bush was acting a lot like Hitler, who also came to power under questionable circumstances. Guantanamo reminded too many of them of the concentration camps where some of their relatives went and never returned. Their thinking sounded way more radical than that of my pals in Berkeley.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 06/14/2008 7:31 pm
Marjorie C.
Elizabeth: “…they thought Bush was acting a lot like Hitler, who also came to power under questionable circumstances.” If they thought Bush was acting a lot like Hitler, I wonder what they’re thinking about now? The speeches. The huge gatherings of mesmerized young. The cult following. The surrogates who are amongst the meanest, ugliest brown shirts to be found (I’m thinking of bloggers for BHO). The grabbing of power (taking control of the Democratic party). Clinton should be canonized a saint for competing as long as she did so we could get a good dose of what was going on. In doing so, she got half the votes, but it wasn’t enough. The deal was sealed before Iowa.
By Marjorie C. on 06/15/2008 6:26 am
Marjorie C.
Frannie: If they are in the slightest way mobile, they are there. I work as a volunteer at the local library, which is also a polling place, and I’m astonished at the dedication these elders have to voting. Snow, pouring rain, ghastly hot days — nothing deters them. And in our small town, the senior vote will overturn anything that will impact their lives negatively every time. Property taxes are reasonable where I live. If they were not, we wouldn’t have so many elders. Round and round we go.
By Marjorie C. on 06/15/2008 6:10 am
lois titherington
Lesley, You are so wise,smart and I love you. I agree about sleep and making bad decisions. We can only imagine how daunting this campaign is. We see him getting thinner and trying to defend himself against all sorts of irrelevant stuff. When will the American public stop listening to all the Roves of the world and choose a president who at least has the brains to pick the right people to help him run the country. Last time they chose the man they most wanted to have a beer with. No wonder we’re in this mess! Lois
By lois titherington on 06/13/2008 9:22 am
sibelle daubigne
Lois, So true, so funny!
By sibelle daubigne on 06/13/2008 9:26 am
sandee means
Like Reverand Wright or Bill Ayers?
By sandee means on 06/14/2008 3:16 am
sibelle daubigne
Sandee Don’t know if the question was for me, but in any case, even though i don’t think Lesley’s article is insulting, i totally agree with you on Health Care “rationing and mismanagement” results! Not only Canada but also England and France somehow! ( i am european).I am not fooled by the “hope and change” euphoria. This country is fascinated with celebrities and stardom, tv realities etc… and we are getting to see the results in politics. Have you read in the NY Times, David Brooks article;”Obama Liberalism and the challenge of Reform” ? Also, i have been in this country long enough to be aware of the Reverand Wright or Bill Ayers syndrome. Last, be sure i am not voting for Obama! Peace
By sibelle daubigne on 06/14/2008 7:37 am
sandee means
I was responding to Lois’ comment “choose a president who at least has the brains to pick the right people to help him run the country.” Thank you for your insight in to national healthcare. Many Americans are being incredibly naive
By sandee means on 06/16/2008 1:12 am
theCHEROKEErose
i will fight this til the last vote…i dont want obama for president…i will not cast a vote to make him president…there is nothing he can do or say that will make me change my mind…mccain is too old and his mind is going…i say we should just remove the position of ‘president/king’ from the govt. of this country and let congress run things…in spite of what he thinks of himself, george only holds 1 dissenting vote in the overall picture…too bad he has used, used, used it to put us where we are today…
By theCHEROKEErose on 06/13/2008 11:32 am
Lady Gator
Cherokee Rose — You sound very much like a friend of mine. A couple of nights ago she was telling me about a group called “Clintons for McCain”. Apparently they are attracting a large group of supporters. She was trying to find out if they had their website up and running. You might give it a try. Other than that I have no other information.
By Lady Gator on 06/13/2008 2:10 pm
sandee means
Lesley, When the suffragettes were fighting for the women’s vote, one of the arguments against them was “women lacked the intelligence to vote well”. Your article gives that argument credence . Your article is insulting. Please don’t respond by saying his “Harvard experience” qualify’s him as smart. I have encountered many, over the years, with impressive resumes, that I wouldn’t trust, to have the common sense, to baby sit a pet turtle! Instead of sex appeal, maybe Obama needs to clarify “hope” & “change” Hope for what? What kind of change? Castro made changes to Cuba! Americans should be asking for specifics!! For example, why should anyone believe that Barack’s desire for gov’t run healthcare would produce anything other than rationing & mismanagement @ even more exorbitant costs. As a healthcare provider, I have worked for the federal gov’t for 7 years via the VA & also for active duty, medical facilities. I also have personally studied other countries socialized medicine. Unlike Obama, I have actual experience & exposure to the failures of government run healthcare. The average wait time in Canada, for open heart surgery is 2 years. Guess what? Most patients don’t live for 2 years while needing open heart surgery!!! This is typical in most countries.
By sandee means on 06/13/2008 12:46 pm