Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Lesley Stahl | 08/26/2008 1:30 pm

It's the Visuals, Stupid

Lesley Stahl

Michelle Obama had two jobs last night: one, to dispel the "elitist" image imposed on the Obamas by the McCain campaign; the other, to deal with the "anger" issue.

That "anger" has to be dealt with is the same as saying race has to be dealt with. I don’t know about you, but I keep hearing that Michelle is "an angry black woman" – which congers up memories of Jesse Jackson, Malcolm X and the old days. Even before he got into politics, Barack Obama realized that projecting a sense of rage would hold him back. It does seem that African Americans who did not grow up in places like the south side of Chicago (where Michelle was raised) are less likely to give off that vibe of wrath. Consider Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. They never scowl or menace.

Sure, issues matter in the race for president, but the character and personality of the candidates may matter more: Do I trust him? Do I like him?

So: How to deal with the problem? Michelle’s way of dealing with it last night was to keep on smilin’. Deliberately. Smile. Smile. Smile.

Let me digress: The school of political handlers – particularly those masters of the photo op – believe that what we see is far more powerful than what we hear. That’s another way of saying that visual images on television have more impact than words. And there’s some evidence to back this up. Subliminal pictures penetrate our eyes and then somehow descend to that hidden place in our guts where our judgments are formed.

Sure, issues matter in the race for president, but the character and personality of the candidates may matter more: Do I trust him? Do I like him? 

So, Michelle kept on smilin’. Barack did too in his cameo appearance via satellite. A toothy grin is like penicillin: It’s supposed to knock out the politically dangerous anger bacterium.

Not only did she smile a lot, Mrs. Obama kept her voice soft and mellow. The quality of voice is also important. I remember thinking, when Ronald Reagan was president: He sounds like cashmere! That soft, toned-down sound was so assuring and inviting.

How the wives come across matters. Cindy McCain will be dealing with her own image problems. She too has to dispel any notion that she’s an elitist (how many houses do they own?). Note that she has flown off to Georgia to highlight the issue of land minds. Watch for the photo ops!

152 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

J B
I’m a Republican but was impressed with Michelle Obama last night. She was interesting, well spoken and warm. I hope Cindy McCain comes across as well although it shouldn’t matter as much as John McCain is a known quantity.
By J B on 08/26/2008 12:53 pm
Buh- Bye
since we’re talking about visuals here - the cosmetics of the look need a makeover - i think michelle should have her eyebrows redone. the current angle of them portrays an unintended scowl. a softer look would help. just MHO.
By Buh- Bye on 08/26/2008 3:26 pm
No Way-No How -No McCain
My Alias, Ring the bell we agree on something…I’ve thought that from the start and wonder why her friend Oprah doesn’t clue her in—-she’s very big on eyebrows.
By No Way-No How -No McCain on 08/26/2008 6:10 pm
N P
Why is it that FOX is handling the video and distribution of the DNC this year? Why is that? Thinking back, the audience that I saw was mostly people of color. And they were wearing funny hats and costume like attire. At least I was are of that. During points in speeches where there were applause, the cameras showed people just sitting there, not applauding and inattentive. I think it was during Michelle’s speech, I heard noise, like people talking in the background, and not paying attention to the speech. It was a heightened sound. Did anyone else hear that? Am I wrong about this? I don’t think so. The person I watched the Convention with said to me at one point, “There is someone with a Cheese on her head.” WHY are we allowing FOX to caricature our Convention???
By N P on 08/26/2008 12:57 pm
N P
By N P on 08/26/2008 1:00 pm
EKA -
Is this not a case of “The Fox getting in to the Henhouse “? The whole thing is appalling, and I am taking little comfort in the fact that NBC will do the RNC… the damage will be done by then. They will deliberately show the MOST unattractive side… yes, the democrats are made up of a wide cross section of america, diversity at it’s best, and not always the most beautiful. Unlike the beautiful, well healed, blond … I better stop while I’m ahead….
By EKA - on 08/26/2008 2:45 pm
N P
EKA, Exactly. That’s what’s going on.
By N P on 08/26/2008 3:40 pm
Juanita Ward
Just get it off your chest! Sometime it gets me in trouble, but so what, I feel better.
By Juanita Ward on 08/26/2008 11:18 pm
Frank Peterson
NP good points—Fox News is the 200 lb Neanderthal in our midst with an IQ of 75 and not much else going for it. Wish someone would pull the plug on them :-)
By Frank Peterson on 08/26/2008 1:09 pm
Star Lawrence
So now Fox should be taken off the air—censored? Just trying to keep up here, Frank.
By Star Lawrence on 08/26/2008 1:47 pm
Nancy Tozier
Maybe Meredith Veiria could, unless she drowns on her Obama drool. Oh wait, she’s totally biased and her, Wolf and Katie wouldn’t know truth or fair REPORTING if it bit them in the behind. Neither NBC nor CNN, CBS, or ABC portrays Repulicans or their candidates fairly or reports the news fairly. I feel like I’m reading “Teen Beat,” when I watch them.
By Nancy Tozier on 08/29/2008 7:51 pm
Diana T
NP, The background noise and funny hats are typical for political conventions. When the party faithfuls get to make their speeches, I have always been aware of the milling around in the aisles. I can’t think of one “quiet” convention, and I’ve been watching them since they were on TV, however long ago that was…
By Diana T on 08/26/2008 1:56 pm
N P
Hi, Diana, I find it unlikely that you would have background noise, like people chattering away, while Michelle Obama or Ted Kennedy were speaking. I realize there is a certain amount of commotion to be expected in these conventions, but my guess is that this background noise was specifically picked up and amplified. To me, it sounded like everyone in the background was chatting away with each other, and not paying attention to the speeches. It wasn’t throughout the entire speech, but one section - somewhere during the speech. It was enough to distract me for a while.
By N P on 08/26/2008 2:15 pm
Diana T
I don’t know, NP, but the background noise has always been something I’ve been aware of in the past. Whatever.
By Diana T on 08/26/2008 2:33 pm
N P
Diana, You’re still coming, and bringing those gorgeous tomatoes, right?
By N P on 08/26/2008 3:41 pm