Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Q & A | 09/03/2008 11:00 am

Lesley Stahl Asks Pollster Dotty Lynch: How Much Can a Controversial VP Pick Hurt a Candidate?

Lesley Stahl
Here’s another of my regular conversations with Dotty Lynch, former pollster, former CBS News election editor and now professor at American University.

LESLEY:
Hi Dotty. Thanks for joining us on Day 3 — or is it Day 2? — of the Republican Convention. Let’s plunge in: How much can a controversial vice-presidential pick hurt a candidate? 

DOTTY: Thinking back to 1972, the Tom Eagleton pick was disastrous for George McGovern. He first backed him, then dumped him, and chose Sarge Shriver and never really recovered. On the other hand, Dan Quayle was thought to be a bad pick but the attacks on him didn’t kill the Bush campaign and they successfully turned the attacks on him to attacks on the media. But when the VP becomes a bigger story than the nominee it usually isn’t a plus.

LESLEY:
I remember how the Bush 41 campaign banished Dan Quayle to tiny cities where there was no media coverage, hoping the public would forget he existed! But isn’t there some cardinal rule in picking a veep candidate — that he or she “do no harm”? Give us your read on how Sarah Palin helps and hurts McCain with various constituencies, like Hillary voters, Catholics and Independents.

DOTTY: Clearly John McCain didn’t feel that way. He decided to roll the dice — no guts no glory, huh? The polling evidence so far is very preliminary, but The New York Times poll found that she helped more with men than with women. And I assume she will energize conservatives and not have a lot of appeal to the liberal women who supported Hillary. So far it’s not clear how she will play with Catholics or Independents.

LESLEY: Obama got a little bit of a bounce out of his convention. What was it? Six points? Then along came Sarah to overshadow everything. Any signs yet of how the Palin choice is playing in the key states?

DOTTY: Not anything new from the key states. We political junkies tend to forget that there was a holiday weekend between Palin’s selection and today. Pollsters know that is a terrible time to get people to respond to polls. Between Labor Day, back to school and Gustav, voters have been preoccupied. That is probably why the McCain folks divulged the information about her daughter on Monday. Polls won’t settle down for another few days at the earliest.

LESLEY:
Then let me ask for your seasoned judgment on the issue of Gov. Palin taking the job with the five kids and the baby with special needs. Call it the Juggling Issue. Will that be a factor – with women?

DOTTY:
Studies have shown that voters — especially older female voters — want women candidates to explain how they can handle both. Fair or unfair, I think Palin will have to address this and convince them that she can handle both jobs. She seems to have convinced Alaskans that she can do both, often bringing her baby to the office.

LESLEY:
Obama responded to the surprising news that Bristol Palin is pregnant with sensitivity and political savvy, saying: We won’t go there. And yet just this morning I heard Republicans slamming the Obama campaign for "using" this as an issue. The Democrats are in a delicate position on this — no matter what they say or don’t say! — the Republicans will attack them for sexism, exploitation. Is there a "clean" way for the Obama campaign to take advantage of what  even some a conservative columnists are saying is an “insulting” choice?

96 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

A N
Kitty, I’m with you. Apparently, one has to be a woman of the left in order to be celebrated or defended. I have lost all respect for Leslie Stahl…she’s no different from the rest of the MSM, biased and sexist.
By A N on 09/06/2008 10:15 pm
lois mackey
So Dana Jae has any congresswomen, senators, at the state or federal level ever raise children while holding their post. Tell me what successful woman or man in middle level or upper management position ever worked a normal 40 hour work week…and let’s not talk about the female doctors, medics, firemen/women, police officers, swing shift workers…maybe we should not have women serving in Iraq if you feel that way…so lets not go there! Privileged white privileged women don’t know how the average working woman does anything!
By lois mackey on 09/03/2008 1:22 pm
Barbara Taylor
Pro-Choice - A woman’s right to choose….. That includes a woman’s right to choose how she and her husband bring up their children. My issue is it does not matter if the woman is a Democrate or Republican, she has a right to run for any public office just as a man without being criticized for not staying in the kitchen. Even if you do not agree with Palin’s politics, and I do not on all she stands for, but we as women should not pounce on her like men. Argue the real issues that face all of us today. If your Pro-Choice then you have to be for the right of a woman to choose how she brings up her family.
By Barbara Taylor on 09/03/2008 2:27 pm
beth willis
oops, oops, please read, important http://www.snopes.com/politics/mccain/citizen.asp
By beth willis on 09/03/2008 10:44 am
Buh- Bye
Controversial VP picks? Biden.
By Buh- Bye on 09/03/2008 10:51 am
Lorraine Bates
I don’t think I have the energy today, M.A. :-)
By Lorraine Bates on 09/03/2008 11:02 am
Star Lawrence
He was the safe pick. Now, since we are being bossy cows, I advise the Dems to convince people that the Senator from Credit Card Land is friend to the working man and woman.
By Star Lawrence on 09/03/2008 3:00 pm
Brooklyn Gal
The conservative agenda is very clear on this issue of “family”. The “Dr. Laura” mode of thinking has always been one parent be home full time. So I understand Mr. Palin will be taking on that role.
By Brooklyn Gal on 09/03/2008 10:51 am
Lorraine Bates
And if he is, great. As the wife of a stay-at-home-dad with special needs kids, I wholeheartedly support that. It’s a necessity, believe me, that one of us is at home at all times. She may want to mention that tonight, to tone down the press and the questions, and take the press spotlight off her family (I hope). Then we can concentrate on her credentials, or lack thereof.
By Lorraine Bates on 09/03/2008 11:01 am
Brooklyn Gal
Lorraine, Absolutely correct. And, stay-at-home dads across the country recognize the important role they play. This “mother” thing should be a non-issue. It would be nice if the Repubs would now focus on the issue of working moms and dads that must work in order to shelter and feed the family. The tax breaks the Repubs are asking for to offset the costs of health insurance and other family needs doesn’t even cover the cost of one month’s coverage.
By Brooklyn Gal on 09/03/2008 11:14 am
Barbara Taylor
Lorraine - Perfect!
By Barbara Taylor on 09/03/2008 3:03 pm
Star Lawrence
Does her mother help out—like Michelle’s mother does?
By Star Lawrence on 09/03/2008 3:01 pm
Dona Howlett
Michelle’s not running for VP. Let’s face it……………most mothers in familys help our with their grandchildren if it’s possible. But to expect a grandmother to give up her life so a daughter can go on to do just what she pleases is very unfair to the older women. It’s not just young woman who should have choices…………that goes for all of us.
By Dona Howlett on 09/03/2008 5:40 pm
Lorraine Bates
Do the kids help out? It sure seems they do.
By Lorraine Bates on 09/03/2008 8:56 pm
Lise 22
Personally, I am so glad to be Canadian. Our election was called just the other day and I will be voting for a party in October, less than 6 weeks again. None the American conventions, news bytes, political gossip, endless polls or comments or criticisms that go on and on and on and on and on and on and on. A few commercials for the next 5 weeks from the 5 parties and then the election night converage and than bingo bango a Prime Minister is elected. The electoral process need not last over a year and cost a bizillion dollars, because in the end the person will the most votes wins, and not always the person who spent the most money campaigning, or the person who gave the better sound bytes, or the person who had the most tv coverage or celebrity backing. Just a Canadian view. If I was an American, and if Ralph Nadar was running I would vote for him as he is the most sensible.
By Lise 22 on 09/03/2008 11:10 am