Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/18/2008 3:00 pm

Firestorm Reactions to Obama's Pick of Anti-Gay Rev. Rick Warren Role in Inauguration

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Obama and Warren shake hands
in Saddleback Forum in August © AP

A firestorm of criticism from liberal and gay-rights activists has followed ever since Obama announced Wednesday that Pastor Dr. Rick Warren will give the invocation at the Inauguration. 

Warren, author of The Purpose Driven Life and other books, preaches conservative Christian issues at his large Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, CA. He stresses about climate, poverty and AIDS in third-world countries. But it’s his outspoken opposition toward abortion and gay marriage that has many human-rights activists, lesbian and gay activists finding Warren’s presence at Obama’s inauguration a slap in the face.

Today, Obama is defending his actions saying that disagreeing is what "America is about." SwampPolitics reports Obama saying:

We’re not going to agree on every single issue, but what we have to do is be able to create an atmosphere where we can disagree without being disagreeable, and then focus on those things that we hold in common. So Rick Warren has been invited to speak. Dr. Joseph Lowery who has deeply contrasting views than Rick Warren on a whole host of issues is also speaking during the course of the entire inaugural festivities, there are going to be a wide range of viewpoints that are presented … Because that’s what America is about.

Click here to read the full transcript.

While Obama is saying that we should all hold hands in harmony and live in peace among our "contrasting views" … his selection of Warren is upsetting human-rights groups. The Human Rights Campaign, the largest homosexual rights organization in the U.S., sent a letter to Obama, urging him to reconsider and calling the invitation "a genuine blow." The letter states that Warren was a proponent of Proposition 8. (The proposition, which eliminated the right of same-sex couples to marry, passed with 52 percent in November.)

"By inviting Rick Warren to your inauguration, you have tarnished the view that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans have a place at your table," says the letter by Joe Solmonese, president of the group. "We feel a deep level of disrespect when one of the architects and promoters of an anti-gay agenda is given the prominence and the pulpit of your historic nomination."

"Rick Warren has not sat on the sidelines in the fight for basic equality and fairness. In fact, Rev. Warren spoke out vocally in support of Prop 8 in California saying, “There is no need to change the universal, historical definition of marriage to appease two percent of our population … This is not a political issue — it is a moral issue that God has spoken clearly about." Furthermore, he continues to misrepresent marriage equality as silencing his religious views. This was a lie during the battle over Proposition 8, and it’s a lie today." 

Click here to read the full letter.

Kathryn Kolbert, president of the equal-rights group People for the American Way, called giving Warren this honor a "grave disappointment."

"Pastor Warren, while enjoying a reputation as a moderate based on his affable personality and his church’s engagement on issues like AIDS in Africa, has said that the real difference between James Dobson and himself is one of tone rather than substance," Kolbert said in a statement. "He has recently compared marriage by loving and committed same-sex couples to incest and pedophilia. He has repeated the Religious Right’s big lie that supporters of equality for gay Americans are out to silence pastors. He has called Christians who advance a social gospel Marxists. He is adamantly opposed to women having a legal right to choose an abortion.

"I’m sure that Warren’s supporters will portray his selection as an appeal to unity by a president who is committed to reaching across traditional divides. Others may explain it as a response to Warren inviting then-Senator Obama to speak on AIDS and candidate Obama to appear at a forum, both at his church. But the sad truth is that this decision further elevates someone who has in recent weeks actively promoted legalized discrimination and denigrated the lives and relationships of millions of Americans." Click here to read the full statement.

309 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Maurine H
Count me among those angered by Obama’s choice of Warren. I realized it’s his choice and he could have invited Joe the Plumber to give the invocation had he wished. But Warren’s views are an insult to many of the electorate who put Obama in the Presidency. I doubt that even 1% of Warren’s enormous right wing congregation voted for Obama. There were so many brilliant choices that would have honored the millions of us who supported Obama throughout his campaign.
By Maurine H on 12/18/2008 3:20 pm
f p
Me too Maurine—his views on women’s rights and gays are repellent to me.
By f p on 12/18/2008 3:21 pm
Bonnie Oliver
President-Elect Obama was asked during the campaign if he supported “gay marriage”. He replied that he did not but he did support gay unions. Wasn’t anyone listening?
By Bonnie Oliver on 12/18/2008 3:53 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Yes, I was. One of the reasons I was a die-hard supporter of Senator Clinton.
By Mugsy Peabody on 12/19/2008 4:28 am
Maurine H
In all fairness, Mugs, we have no idea who Sen. Clinton might have chosen to give the invocation at her inauguration had she been elected. But my guess is that she would not have selected Barack Obama to be her Sec. of State or even a member of her cabinet.
By Maurine H on 12/19/2008 2:31 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Yes, Mo, but that isn’t the question. As you can see below, the ignorant, arrogant, hateful people are still wrapping themselves in the cross and pretending they are therefore good people while spreading hatred and bigotry. And Sen. Clinton came out strongly in favor of gay marriage, as opposed to Obama, who came out like two weeks before with a semi-weak “domestic partners” remark of some sort. As Ms. Tomlin said, that’s second-class citizenship.
By Mugsy Peabody on 12/19/2008 8:08 pm
Maurine H
Well, I must admit I’m confused about Hillary Clinton’s position: “Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage always has been, between a man and a woman.” - Hillary Clinton, opposing same-sex marriages, quoted in The New York Daily News. “Civil unions give gay and lesbian couples the stability and security they need without interfering in any way with the tradition of marriage,” Clinton explains. “I support full equality of benefits, rights, and responsibilities for individuals in loving, stable, same sex relationships, and believe that civil unions are the way to achieve that goal. I do not think that civil unions should be less than marriage - there needs to be equality of benefits.” From what I understand, Clinton was strongly supportive of civil unions but not of gay marriage. Do you have information I’ve missed somewhere? (Always a distinct possibility!). Thanks, Mo
By Maurine H on 12/20/2008 1:18 am
f p
Mugsy, have a merry Christmas :-)
By f p on 12/24/2008 11:26 am
Buh- Bye
Exactly Bonnie. Obama must make amends to women and gays. 1. Bring in a strong feminist as the new head speechwriter… to whom Jon Favreau must then report. 2. Followup Warren’s appearance at the inauguration with a poem delivered by an openly gay poet. 3. Have Ellen DeGeneres lead the conga line dance from the dais
By Buh- Bye on 12/23/2008 10:54 am
Frannie Em
Pi LOL. I love conga lines.
By Frannie Em on 12/23/2008 7:20 pm
Buh- Bye
:) Hi F’em
By Buh- Bye on 12/23/2008 8:22 pm
f p
Frannie my dear friend—have a merry Christmas—hope E. is with you and everyone is fine.
By f p on 12/24/2008 11:27 am
Susan B
I love it!
By Susan B on 12/24/2008 3:21 pm
Kathrine Gluvna
I think that no matter who he chose, someone would be flipping out.
By Kathrine Gluvna on 12/18/2008 4:02 pm
Susan B
Yes, flipping out is something many, many people do with ease … their personal views being the epicenter of the Universe as they are. It occurs to me that Obama’s choice of Warren was done intentionally to ruffle feathers. He is extremely shrewd, and always seems to be two steps ahead of the obvious and the expected. I don’t believe he’s courting anyone with this move, quite the opposite.
By Susan B on 12/24/2008 3:32 pm