Wall Street Weekly | 02/20/2009 9:38 am
Liz Peek: Stock Market Gives Obama’s First Month An 'F'

The White House scramble has led to creeping fear that we’re dealing
with the Junior Varsity. I’ve even heard people pining for former
Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson — hard to imagine, right? (No one
quite misses Bush yet; let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.)
Now we need President Obama to quit the campaign trail and start looking presidential. He needs to take ownership of the country’s problems and solutions. We all get that he inherited this mess, but as a candidate he had a lot of answers on how he would manage the clean-up; it’s time to get on with it. He needs to push his initiatives forward as quickly as possible, and create some optimism that spending trillions of dollars will get us out of this crisis. We know that having the government patch up schools or revise mortgages will be untidy and expensive, but the sheer volume of money being thrown at these problems will ultimately have an impact.
Even the expectation of help on the way could prove beneficial. I usually try to find some good news to share with wOw readers, and so I am happy to report that yesterday the Conference Board reported that its index of leading indicators rose in January for the second month in a row. The index turned negative in July 2007, heralding the downturn, and appears to have bottomed this past December. Items boosting the index are a strong rise in the nation’s money supply, improved credit spreads, a slight pop in new orders for nondefense capital goods and a modest rise in consumer expectations.
My concern is that recent events have squelched that optimism among consumers, and that the nation’s mood is even darker than it was a few months ago. Remember how Obama derided the “politics of fear?” He’s become its greatest champion.























1004 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
CAJ,
Thank you! This is only just starting; indeed all the facets of recovery and reform aren’t even in place yet! And, of course the stock market is going to reflect that for a host of reasons….
I am sick and tired of the mental attitude that everything has to be fixed in an instant! We are in the 21st century using economic models from the 20th century, and we are going to have to update, cure what damage has taken place, and completely reformulate many systems. And, guess what! It’s going to cost us! Gee whiz, we are actually going to have to pay for something if we are to maintain our position in the world. This is just not an American Crisis—it’s an International one and we are the Epi-Center!
It may take the better part of a decade to fix, and I, am for one, sick and tired of naysayers.
Have you seen this Diana:
"GOP Fighting For Money from Stimulus They Opposed"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/18/gop-fighting-for-money-fr_n_167…
excerpt: "Republicans will be working hard to make sure the money they opposed ends up benefiting their home districts, highlighting the political tightrope they walk in this economic crisis. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is watching House Republicans — and reading local media — closely and is only too happy to highlight any happy talk about a stimulus Republicans voted against…. "
Seems to me that a lot of people have forgotten what the Democrats have also done to our economy. Does everyone have horse blinders on during Fannie and Freddies Fiasko. I am not rich but I am in good shape because I dont attempt to purchase beyond my means. Yes I am a Republican and I think Bush did a crappy job in various areas. However; he was not the fix all to our every problem just like Obama is not. It’s the American peoples responsibility to grow up and stop buying what they really cant afford.
Why should we save the Banks for all legitimate foreclosures? All of these people that couldn’t work the math when they applied for the loan dont deserve help from us, only the banks can make it right and eat their losses. can you say greed?
U.S. Sen. Carl Levin remembers, Bill. I interviewed him Thursday in Lansing. He blamed II-Bush - and rightfully so - for a majority of the mess we’re in. But he also said Clinton was wrong about NAFTA, something Levin did not support. We rushed into these trade agreements without adequate protections built-in, and now the chickens have come home to roost.
Hindsight is always 20/20, regardless. I’m not in favor of supporting all of the banks, by any means. But it’s too complicted to figure out who all the bad/good guys are, hence the theory that we’d better do something to stimulate the economy.
Ciao, Giacomo. Imagine a very old Sicilian lady, white hair and barely able to stand straight, delivering to you the lightest, tastiest, most succulent veggie lasagna you’ve ever eaten in your life. As she hands it to you, she says: Mange! Best, Rocky
Don’t worry, I doubt much money will go the Republicans. Especially we might have to use some of the ‘crap-sandwich’ money to bailout Obama’s presidential campaign, which still owe Chicago 1.7 millions (http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1441157,CST-NWS-rally20.article) and Philadelphia $24K (http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/20/philly-to-obama-hey-you-owe-us-money-too/) LOL
emm I’m not sure how this forum works!!! how do I know what new topic is introduced? How do I follow you? I think this thread is about done and i dont want to lose you! Please
let me know
Freda