Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 02/20/2009 9:38 am

Liz Peek: Stock Market Gives Obama’s First Month An 'F'

By Liz Peek
© AP
Over the realistic objections of the National Economic Council’s Larry Summers and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, it is said that Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel encouraged Senator Chris Dodd to, at the last minute, attach a punitive pay cap on Wall Street execs into the stimulus bill. This tug of war may also account for the gaping holes in the financial bill delivered with child-like upspeak by Geithner, and similar inadequacies in the new mortgage plan. The housing program stupidly omits an obvious need to insulate mortgage servicers from legal claims that they abridged mortgage-holders rights. Because so many mortgages were packaged and sold off to investors, immunity from lawsuits is a necessity if we want servicers to change mortgage terms.

The White House scramble has led to creeping fear that we’re dealing with the Junior Varsity. I’ve even heard people pining for former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson — hard to imagine, right? (No one quite misses Bush yet; let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.)

Now we need President Obama to quit the campaign trail and start looking presidential. He needs to take ownership of the country’s problems and solutions. We all get that he inherited this mess, but as a candidate he had a lot of answers on how he would manage the clean-up; it’s time to get on with it. He needs to push his initiatives forward as quickly as possible, and create some optimism that spending trillions of dollars will get us out of this crisis. We know that having the government patch up schools or revise mortgages will be untidy and expensive, but the sheer volume of money being thrown at these problems will ultimately have an impact.

Even the expectation of help on the way could prove beneficial. I usually try to find some good news to share with wOw readers, and so I am happy to report that yesterday the Conference Board reported that its index of leading indicators rose in January for the second month in a row. The index turned negative in July 2007, heralding the downturn, and appears to have bottomed this past December. Items boosting the index are a strong rise in the nation’s money supply, improved credit spreads, a slight pop in new orders for nondefense capital goods and a modest rise in consumer expectations.

My concern is that recent events have squelched that optimism among consumers, and that the nation’s mood is even darker than it was a few months ago. Remember how Obama derided the “politics of fear?” He’s become its greatest champion.

1004 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

caj p
How can you give an F on something that has not even had any kind of chance to show any sign of anything yet!!   What a stupid analysis to come up with and expect things to turn around like yesterday…this woman needs to get a real job and stop making such ridiculous statements so soon into a crisis.  I did make a prediction myself saying that when Obama was made President on the 20th Jan all those negative folks would be expecting the whole country to be put completely right by the 21st!!!
By caj p on 02/20/2009 11:54 am
Diana T

CAJ,

Thank you!  This is only just starting; indeed all the facets of recovery and reform aren’t even in place yet!  And, of course the stock market is going to reflect that for a host of reasons….

I am sick and tired of the mental attitude that everything has to be fixed in an instant!  We are in the 21st century using economic models from the 20th century, and we are going to have to update, cure what damage has taken place, and completely reformulate many systems.  And, guess what!  It’s going to cost us!  Gee whiz, we are actually going to have to pay for something if we are to maintain our position in the world.  This is just not an American Crisis—it’s an International one and we are the Epi-Center!

It may take the better part of a decade to fix, and I, am for one, sick and tired of naysayers.

By Diana T on 02/20/2009 12:05 pm
DeBúrca obj

Have you seen this Diana:

"GOP Fighting For Money from Stimulus They Opposed" 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/18/gop-fighting-for-money-fr_n_167…

excerpt: "Republicans will be working hard to make sure the money they opposed ends up benefiting their home districts, highlighting the political tightrope they walk in this economic crisis. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is watching House Republicans — and reading local media — closely and is only too happy to highlight any happy talk about a stimulus Republicans voted against…. " 

By DeBúrca obj on 02/20/2009 12:48 pm
rocky rocky
DeB — If they’re so sure that the Stimulus money (and the debt it represents) is destructive to our economy, our country, and future generations, then why do they have their hands out? Is there a word for someone who professes belief in an idea but is willing to dump it at the first sight of green? 
By rocky rocky on 02/20/2009 4:27 pm
James the Game
That sums it up pretty well, Rock. Liz Peek’s obviously another rich Republican who’s forgotten about what Bush did to the economy
By James the Game on 02/21/2009 11:20 am
Bil Boetticher

Seems to me that a lot of people have forgotten what the Democrats have also done to our economy. Does everyone have horse blinders on during Fannie and Freddies Fiasko. I am not rich but I am in good shape because I dont attempt to purchase beyond my means. Yes I am a Republican and I think Bush did a crappy job in various areas. However; he was not the fix all to our every problem just like Obama is not. It’s the American peoples responsibility to grow up and stop buying what they really cant afford.

Why should we save the Banks for all legitimate foreclosures? All of these people that couldn’t work the math when they applied for the loan dont deserve help from us, only the banks can make it right and eat their losses. can you say greed?

 

By Bil Boetticher on 02/21/2009 1:01 pm
James the Game

U.S. Sen. Carl Levin remembers, Bill. I interviewed him Thursday in Lansing. He blamed II-Bush - and rightfully so - for a majority of the mess we’re in. But he also said Clinton was wrong about NAFTA, something Levin did not support. We rushed into these trade agreements without adequate protections built-in, and now the chickens have come home to roost.

Hindsight is always 20/20, regardless. I’m not in favor of supporting all of the banks, by any means. But it’s too complicted to figure out who all the bad/good guys are, hence the theory that we’d better do something to stimulate the economy.

By James the Game on 02/21/2009 2:55 pm
rocky rocky

Ciao, Giacomo. Imagine a very old Sicilian lady, white hair and barely able to stand straight, delivering to you the lightest, tastiest, most succulent veggie lasagna you’ve ever eaten in your life. As she hands it to you, she says: Mange! Best, Rocky

By rocky rocky on 02/21/2009 3:07 pm
James the Game
Rock, I don’t get that one. Ha! But lasagna sounds good
By James the Game on 02/21/2009 6:18 pm
rocky rocky
Must be the refrigerator in your photo. Makes me think of food. And it was so nice to get a friendly reply for a change … must of lost my mind for a moment. Giacomo = James. Bent, white-haired Sicilian nona (grandma) is me!
By rocky rocky on 02/21/2009 7:02 pm
James the Game
Italian’s my fave!
By James the Game on 02/21/2009 8:16 pm
Julie Smith

Don’t worry, I doubt much money will go the Republicans.   Especially we might have to use some of the ‘crap-sandwich’ money to bailout Obama’s presidential campaign, which still owe Chicago 1.7 millions (http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1441157,CST-NWS-rally20.article)  and Philadelphia $24K (http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/20/philly-to-obama-hey-you-owe-us-money-too/LOL

By Julie Smith on 02/20/2009 5:03 pm
Libra Lady
Julie…you got that right…Chicago needs to be reimbursed for 1.7 mill. and PA….but they probably have that hidden in the "Sucker Package" somewhere so it will be paid from that….Just Sayin’!
By Libra Lady on 02/21/2009 8:27 am
freda rogers

emm I’m not sure how this forum works!!!  how do I know what  new topic is introduced?  How do I follow you?  I think this thread is about done and i dont want to lose you!  Please

let me know

Freda

By freda rogers on 02/23/2009 6:38 pm
Libra Lady
freda…top right…. there is a drop down list of of topics…just click on them…or click on Home in the headline (upper left)…click on any of the topics you want to go to…child care got very hot today and many deletes…including mine….I think wow ‘s ten commandments violations are a little one sided….so don’t really don’t know how to post anymore…I guess you can bash Pres. Bush and Gov. Palin and say whatever you want, but don’t you dare touch bo and mo….so watch your posts…hope to see you out there…just reply to one of my post and I will find you….
By Libra Lady on 02/23/2009 8:00 pm