Wall Street Weekly | 02/20/2009 9:38 am
Liz Peek: Stock Market Gives Obama’s First Month An 'F'

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s Wall Street Weekly and SHEconomics.
Today marks the one-month anniversary of President Obama’s inauguration. In his brief time in office, the president has overseen three massive new spending initiatives — the $787 billion stimulus bill, the trillion-dollar financial stability initiative and, most recently, the $275 billion mortgage assistance program.
That’s a lot of activity, and a ton of money, but so far the reaction to the new administration’s programs has been decidedly negative. Investors, among others, have panned the plans; the stock market is off nearly 10% from the day before the inauguration, or more than 800 points on the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Yesterday, in fact, we crossed a truly alarming divide. The Dow Jones average closed at its lowest point since October 2002, the bottom of the last bear market. The S&P 500 fell to 779, barely above the intra-day low of 741 of last November. For many market analysts, if the market crashes through that recent benchmark, it will next move significantly lower. Ouch.
What is going to turn this beast around, and what should the president do? First of all, let’s dispense with the antiquated notion that only rich people own stocks, and that the market’s ups and downs are unimportant. Almost everyone has a stake in our financial markets, either through owning stocks and bonds directly or through pension plans. Even the neediest Americans who are fed or clothed by charities are hurt when those organizations’ endowments crater or donations dry up.
Clearly, it is way too early for any of the new stabilization and stimulus programs to have taken effect. Why then is the consensus so pessimistic? Certainly the political wrangling of the past month has dispelled optimism that President Obama can change the contentious nature of American politics. Both Democrats and Republicans have spurned Obama’s leadership. The free-for-all over the stimulus bill portrayed Congress in the worst possible light — no surprise there — and led Americans to view not only the process but the bill with utter skepticism. Delivering a 1000-page bill to our legislators just two hours before the signing deadline (and then going on a long-weekend holiday before signing it) was outrageous. The mortgage relief plan hasn’t been received much better. Most Americans (ninety two percent, by some estimates) pay their mortgages on time; they’re darned if they know why they should bail out their neighbors.
At the same time, Obama’s own administration seems sharply divided between pragmatists and ideologues. For instance, one camp is pushing for protectionist measures while the other recognizes the dire consequences that "Buy American" provisions might deliver.























1004 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Great job on this wonderfully ironic reply!
It’s the best I’ve seen on this site.
the market started going south when investors saw the liberal dem candiate was likely going to win the white house with control of congress. This mess is because of dem congress policies on the banking industry with investors pulling out of an unfriendly buisness enviorment with liberal politicans running the show.
you can blame Bush all you want but investors didn’t bail out on W.
Well actually I do understand the point you want to make but you haven’t really made it. You want people to believe that corrupt Wall Street Republicans made money hand over fist by double dealing with the Bush administration. The problem is, you haven’t shown that to be true. And you would probably have a tough time doing so because a large number of Wall Street types are democrats. See the links below.
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F2700
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F03
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F07++&goButt2.x=7&goButt2.y=7
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F2600&goButt2.x=6&goButt2.y=7
Phyllis, I think what people don’t get is A. this is a global crisis, and the G7 has agreed that they have to do what is necessary in their countries with banking reform and economic stimulus, and B. this is set up as a partnership between the states, the towns and the Federal Government. The epicenter of the crisis is here in the good ol’ USA, and we got to get the ball rolling.
But, unfortunately, as you can see in many of these posts, a lot of folks are not capable of thinking anyway except locally, and are incapable of thinking of anything except Taking Obama Down and Making Him Look Foolish and Like a Failure. Well, we have two ways to go with this: up or down, and I think it’s a shame that people don’t put any more thought into it than they do.
Phyllis, I forgot to say a p.s.
You’ve got a sweet husband :-)
Diana
I pay for a lot. I donate when there are local or international crisis, and I don’t forget to donate more when it is needed. I pay lots of taxes, and soon, as a resident of Calif, I will pay more. Sales tax is going up out here to 9.25%. for a $10.00 item, I will pay $10.93. Crazy. There are also thinking about taxing things that they didn’t tax before like veterinary services. Calif has over 10% of the population of the nation. Last year we had a net loss in our state which is very unusual, many businesses are moving to other states to do business cheaper, all of this will have a great impact on us and everyone, we won’t be able to help the people that are already here and need it. Last year our state legislature voted in a pay hike for state employees, Some of them got a 27% hike in pay, and then the state started heading towards deficit. There are definitely other causes than that, but I don’t know how much more we can pay.
I have paid my mortgage, my car payments, all the overhead on my business, I donate money, I donate food, I donate clothing, and when we don’t have work, we have used our savings while we pay our employees. I contribute a lot and keep on doing it.
caj: …ridiculous statements so soon into a crisis…
It appears Liz is trying to cut Obama some slack in this statement: We all get that he inherited this mess, but as a candidate he had a lot of answers on how he would manage the clean-up; it’s time to get on with it. He needs to push his initiatives forward as quickly as possible,…
She is simply saying, Obama had many solutions during the campaign, it’s time he put some of them at work and push them through.