Wall Street Weekly | 02/20/2009 9:38 am
Liz Peek: Stock Market Gives Obama’s First Month An 'F'

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s Wall Street Weekly and SHEconomics.
Today marks the one-month anniversary of President Obama’s inauguration. In his brief time in office, the president has overseen three massive new spending initiatives — the $787 billion stimulus bill, the trillion-dollar financial stability initiative and, most recently, the $275 billion mortgage assistance program.
That’s a lot of activity, and a ton of money, but so far the reaction to the new administration’s programs has been decidedly negative. Investors, among others, have panned the plans; the stock market is off nearly 10% from the day before the inauguration, or more than 800 points on the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Yesterday, in fact, we crossed a truly alarming divide. The Dow Jones average closed at its lowest point since October 2002, the bottom of the last bear market. The S&P 500 fell to 779, barely above the intra-day low of 741 of last November. For many market analysts, if the market crashes through that recent benchmark, it will next move significantly lower. Ouch.
What is going to turn this beast around, and what should the president do? First of all, let’s dispense with the antiquated notion that only rich people own stocks, and that the market’s ups and downs are unimportant. Almost everyone has a stake in our financial markets, either through owning stocks and bonds directly or through pension plans. Even the neediest Americans who are fed or clothed by charities are hurt when those organizations’ endowments crater or donations dry up.
Clearly, it is way too early for any of the new stabilization and stimulus programs to have taken effect. Why then is the consensus so pessimistic? Certainly the political wrangling of the past month has dispelled optimism that President Obama can change the contentious nature of American politics. Both Democrats and Republicans have spurned Obama’s leadership. The free-for-all over the stimulus bill portrayed Congress in the worst possible light — no surprise there — and led Americans to view not only the process but the bill with utter skepticism. Delivering a 1000-page bill to our legislators just two hours before the signing deadline (and then going on a long-weekend holiday before signing it) was outrageous. The mortgage relief plan hasn’t been received much better. Most Americans (ninety two percent, by some estimates) pay their mortgages on time; they’re darned if they know why they should bail out their neighbors.
At the same time, Obama’s own administration seems sharply divided between pragmatists and ideologues. For instance, one camp is pushing for protectionist measures while the other recognizes the dire consequences that "Buy American" provisions might deliver.























1004 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
C jay: Threatened, are you Margie.
And you, C jay are the other laptop that Suzanne (Rose~~) is posting from. Thats two, and there are probably more.
As for my withdrawing, I’m not having a problem with Liz Peek’s article. I agree with her 100%.
I wasn’t here during the primaries but I have "strolled" through all of the old posts. Amazing! The very people with their inflatable halos on the Comments thread were amazingly crude and aggressive shall we say "back in the day."
What I feel brings out the bulldogs is opposition to the president. Many people didn’t vote for him. Those that did voted for him because he was black, they hated McCain/Palin or the time was right for a moral vote. Of course, there were people who bought into his hope and change and thought him "brilliant."
Of those voters, there must be a large percentage who have changed their minds. Not the ones who thought him "brilliant" because that would be too painful to admit that Hillary Clinton would’ve been a much more decisive and experienced president. Lately, at the end of every day, I have to believe that some of liberals feel that way.
Hillary’s democratic party let her down and she knows it. I’m sure she and Bill talk about it every night.
phyllis: verbose, maybe, but toothless?
LOL. Suzanne (Rose~~, Carmel, C jay, etc.) is a trip, there’s no doubt about that.
eleanor: …rose does sound familiar…
I think Rose~~ and C jay are side-by-side laptops. Took me a while to catch on, too.
Sibelle - What??
Does she really use all those aliases? Since we are allowed only two separate identities at Wow, per computer, then how many computers could she be using? That sounds like a joke …. in fact, it is a joke!
I had my suspicions but I thought Rose might be a poster who previously posted as CA Rose? As for the others? Well, as I said, I was suspicious.
Suzanne
So those are the peach roses for an avatar that you talked about long ago.
I know that you have had connections with investment firms before, so I am wondering what your honest take is on how this will all work. I hear either complaints or praises but no actual thoughts on how the mechanics of it will play out. Is there enough stimulus spending, to eventually promote more manufacturing that we can export? I ask this question to try to get a grip on how long it might take to turn the economy around and be able to start paying down the deficit. Because, hopefully, at some point, we will start the pay down. If the spending is renewed each year, do you believe that we will be able to get on top of the debt? Those are my concerns, and you might have some ideas about it.
you mentioned the group of facebook, but many of them are here right now.