Wall Street Weekly | 02/20/2009 9:38 am
Liz Peek: Stock Market Gives Obama’s First Month An 'F'

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s Wall Street Weekly and SHEconomics.
Today marks the one-month anniversary of President Obama’s inauguration. In his brief time in office, the president has overseen three massive new spending initiatives — the $787 billion stimulus bill, the trillion-dollar financial stability initiative and, most recently, the $275 billion mortgage assistance program.
That’s a lot of activity, and a ton of money, but so far the reaction to the new administration’s programs has been decidedly negative. Investors, among others, have panned the plans; the stock market is off nearly 10% from the day before the inauguration, or more than 800 points on the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Yesterday, in fact, we crossed a truly alarming divide. The Dow Jones average closed at its lowest point since October 2002, the bottom of the last bear market. The S&P 500 fell to 779, barely above the intra-day low of 741 of last November. For many market analysts, if the market crashes through that recent benchmark, it will next move significantly lower. Ouch.
What is going to turn this beast around, and what should the president do? First of all, let’s dispense with the antiquated notion that only rich people own stocks, and that the market’s ups and downs are unimportant. Almost everyone has a stake in our financial markets, either through owning stocks and bonds directly or through pension plans. Even the neediest Americans who are fed or clothed by charities are hurt when those organizations’ endowments crater or donations dry up.
Clearly, it is way too early for any of the new stabilization and stimulus programs to have taken effect. Why then is the consensus so pessimistic? Certainly the political wrangling of the past month has dispelled optimism that President Obama can change the contentious nature of American politics. Both Democrats and Republicans have spurned Obama’s leadership. The free-for-all over the stimulus bill portrayed Congress in the worst possible light — no surprise there — and led Americans to view not only the process but the bill with utter skepticism. Delivering a 1000-page bill to our legislators just two hours before the signing deadline (and then going on a long-weekend holiday before signing it) was outrageous. The mortgage relief plan hasn’t been received much better. Most Americans (ninety two percent, by some estimates) pay their mortgages on time; they’re darned if they know why they should bail out their neighbors.
At the same time, Obama’s own administration seems sharply divided between pragmatists and ideologues. For instance, one camp is pushing for protectionist measures while the other recognizes the dire consequences that "Buy American" provisions might deliver.























1004 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
- Main Entry:
- fas·cism
- Pronunciation:
- \ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi-\
- Function:
- noun
- Etymology:
- Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
- Date:
- 1921
1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition Since you obviously don’t know what Fascism means I thought I would try to educate you. It is Obama and the Left that are trying to usurp the rights of the individual for the collective. It is the nature of Socialists and Communists.Precisely, and please include the 2nd paragraph from Webster, or is that also too traditional?
I was thinking the same damn thing, C jay! All of these men creeping into a site for WOMEN!
Guys, this is WOW (women on the web) not MOM (men on the make).
Poor Boys, they’re threatended now. Pass them the purple pills.
Really though, I don’t read them any more, nor the other screamers. On a website such as this one, we have no idea what the actual identity, or sex, of anyone really is, or may not be. Scary.
Dems did not have any lead in Congress until 2006 and then barely, Steve. Try reassessing Enron if you want to see how we got here.
Peace and grace