Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 08/24/2008 3:00 pm

China's Quest for Gold: Limited to the Games? by Liz Peek

By Liz Peek
© Shutterstock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 8/18)

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist.

Instead of focusing on yield spreads and oil futures this week, I have been totally caught up in the latest medals tallies. Along with hundreds of thousands of others from all over the world, I am in Beijing for the Olympics, witness to China’s emergence on the world stage. Never has a country thrown itself into the promotion and celebration of these contests as energetically as the Chinese; the results from their viewpoint have doubtless been worth every penny of the $40 billion they spent – and that’s just on the venues.

The tsunami of nationalistic pride rolling over this country is palpable. Some 840 million Chinese watched the opening ceremonies on TV, and the audience has only grown since then. Restaurants, hotels, and shops have set up large flat screens so diners won’t miss a moment of their athletes’ accomplishments. The government has dedicated three TV channels to coverage of the Games, or at least to those where the Chinese are victorious. I cannot possibly estimate how many hours of table tennis they have broadcast. If you’re interested in who won the beach volleyball or basketball, better wait for CNN.

The Chinese have pulled off an almost impossible makeover of Beijing. The city fairly glistens it is so clean; there is no spitting or littering, the skies are (almost) blue and the avenues are planted with thousands of flowers and trees that will hopefully survive the return of Beijing’s signature smog. The game sites are well organized, with thousands of guards and ushers guaranteeing order and security. The people working at the sites are unfailingly polite. They welcome you to the events even while patting you down in the security lines and thank you for coming. They are cheerful and tidy and eager to help. Nothing has been left to chance. 

At the gold-medal soccer match Saturday between Argentina and Nigeria, there were cheering sections for each nation at opposite ends of the "bird’s nest" stadium. Row upon row of people dressed in the contestants’ colors yelled and banged color-coordinated Styrofoam sticks, causing quite a ruckus. It was thrilling to think that such large groups of Argentine or Nigerian fans could have made the trek to Beijing to cheer on their teams. The reality was — these enthusiasts were Chinese. They had been dressed up for the occasion, and though inadequately coached in the subtleties of the game (they frequently cheered at mystifying times), they did their level best to act like Yankees fans. The organizers must have worried that there would not be enough team spirit, so they created some of their own. 

What has certainly not been left to chance is the outcome of the Games. The Chinese government decided to win more gold medals than anyone else, and they have done it. They calculated where their advantages lay, and focused on games and sports where they have historically been strong, or where others have had little interest. Of the 47 gold medals won by the Chinese as of yesterday, 20 have come from weightlifting, badminton, diving, and table tennis. Really – Chinese totally dominated women’s weight lifting. 

So what do we make of this newfangled China? It is clearly ambitious, strong, and succeeding beyond their dreams. And yet, they face huge challenges. Recently, the All-China Federation of Trade Unions announced that unions would in the future provide free legal aid for "farmers-turned-workers, employees in financial distress and those whose rights are seriously violated." This is in response to more than 400,000 labor disputes that arose last year; in the first quarter of this year the total was up 87%. 

Many of these stem from uneducated farmers migrating to the cities. A government report out this week forecast that by 2030 some 60% of the population or 900 million people will live in urban areas, up from 45%, or 600 million, last year. In other words, more than 10 million people over each of the next 20 years will stream into cities already struggling to create jobs and housing for their burgeoning populations.

This is not only an issue for China, but for the whole world. It has been calculated that the country needs to expand at 11% to 12% a year to provide jobs for this shifting population. In the last quarter the country grew only 10.1%, down from 11.9% for all of 2007. Export growth has declined, causing much of the slowdown. The government may well respond by halting the advance of the renminbi, which had been gaining ground steadily against the dollar, and which has suddenly stagnated. This would not be good for trade relations or for those countries like the U.S. still losing manufacturing jobs to China.

This pressing need for growth also means that fighting pollution may continue to be a secondary concern. Environmental officials are now suggesting that some of the measures adopted to improve the air quality in Beijing could be kept in place, so pleased are they with the result. Do they really expect the industrial companies that were required to shut down over a month ago to stay shuttered? 

China’s quest for gold will not end with the closing ceremonies tonight. The world will be competing with an aggressive China for the foreseeable future. Let us hope the contest remains as orderly and friendly as these Games have been.   

5 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Sam Mirando
Let us hope the contest remains as orderly and friendly as these Games have been.” From your mouth to God’s ears, as they say. The wars of the 21st century will be fought, all over the world, for resources, such as oil, gas and water; minerals for industrial development; and uranium for those nice big bombs that allow countries to throw their weight about (the USA included). As more and more people aspire to the standard of living that American citizens have taken as their birthright, there will be less and less of all these resources for us - and rightly so. However, if the oceans become stagnant ponds, and if the air and water become too polluted for life on land, we shall all cede this planet to the cockroaches.
By Sam Mirando on 08/25/2008 9:20 am
K O
On the surface, it seems that the burgeoning middle class in China as well as India will put upward pressure on the commodity markets in the intermediate term. But generally, a more capitalistic China will be good for all of us, if the currency is not manipulated and free trade agreements are obeyed. The latter is the issue of most concern to me.
By K O on 08/25/2008 9:32 am
Dr. Mark Klein
On the subject of (black) gold, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates visited Alberta’s oil sands region to check out the industry. I’m a very big fan of Canadian Oil Sands Trust (COSWF). Is there another bid coming for Fording Canadian Coal Trust (FDG) and/or is there enough opposition to the Teck Cominco sweetheart offer to prevent the company from getting the 66.66% required vote? While the nominal offer is about $93, the tax consequences for American and Canadian holders are adverse the deal’s worth $80 at most. Fording is trading at $88.50 today.
By Dr. Mark Klein on 08/25/2008 9:42 am
James the Game
Doc, do you mean other than last month’s announcement that Teck Cominco (TCK) was purching the open-ended mutual Coal Trust (FDG) for $82.00 cash and 0.245 shares of TCK per share of FDG held? Or, at more than a 12% premium.
By James the Game on 08/27/2008 1:42 am
Bonnie Oliver
Thank you Liz for your analysis. Isn’t it perplexing that throughout history China has played a role that is almost the equivalent of the Egyptian Sphinx? They are an off-and-on again closed society. They are superstitious beyond the norm and have a history older than one can imagine and more people than they can comfortably feed. A beautiful nation with problems unimagined. They spent $40 billion to host the Summer Olympics. No country will be able to ever match that amount….and, really, nor should they. But China needed everything….all new venues in Beijing including the fantastic Bird’s Nest stadium and the Blue Water Cube. They will remain while the baseball diamond will soon become a new condominium complex. Was it worth the $40 billion? Did China win enough gold medals and international prestige to compensate for the cost? Did they create enough memories of acclaim? Their place in the global economy is already established and the reawakening of China from the cold days of the last half century is unstoppable. But will they be able to create enough business and profit so that they can feed and house their many millions in need? I hope so. In 2010 the ‘one child’ policy will expire. Will the government calmly renew that heartbreaking yet necessary edict? Can they afford not to?
By Bonnie Oliver on 08/25/2008 4:36 pm