Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 01/23/2009 11:15 am

Liz Peek: Obama Has No Magic Wand, People

By Liz Peek

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 1/19) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics

What a week! We have a new president who had, as I count it, exactly two days of honeymoon before the yappers got busy. Paul Krugman, who must be feeling sort of empty now that President Bush has gone off to Crawford, has already started whining about President Obama. He didn’t like his Inauguration speech, because Obama didn’t rail about greedy Wall Streeters and promise universal health care. To Mr. Krugman, that was a grievous sin of omission. That Mr. Obama dared to suggest that the current economic meltdown was due to “our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age” rankled Mr. Krugman, who professed to have no idea what he was talking about.

I’m not sure I know either, but I do think that the financial mess we are in emerged from a number of sources, including Congress’ insistence on broadening home ownership to people who couldn’t afford homes. That impetus led to bad choices all around, which were quickly magnified by the wizards of Wall Street, who concocted ways of temporarily submerging bad debts into even worse securities. 

Krugman’s real complaint is that Obama’s economic message sounds like “business as usual.” Here’s a secret: This stuff isn’t easy. Waving a magic wand to fund health care or to make bad debts disappear is a lot easier in print than in reality. The standard big-government fixes cost money, and right now the nation’s coffers are not exactly teeming.

It’s not only the pundits who have started to whine. The market fell like a stone Tuesday while millions on the Washington Mall cheered on the new commander in chief. The Dow Jones tumbled more than 4% – the worst Inauguration-day performance ever. Once again, we have the banks to thank for the collapse. As the financials report their fourth-quarter results, investors are being reminded once again just how much their balance sheets resemble Swiss cheese. Huge write-downs, mandated in part by a controversial accounting regulation that makes financials mark their portfolios to market values, continue to undermine confidence in the sector.

Meanwhile, some of the giant banks appear in disarray. Citigroup announced this week that it may split itself in half, and also tossed out their chairman, Win Bischoff, replacing him with Richard Parsons. Dick Parsons is a terrific fellow, but his appointment to this position isn’t terribly inspiring. He was the fellow who managed Time Warner through a difficult time, but he was also part of the team that created that unwieldy enterprise. He has been on the board of Citi since 1995; on the one hand that makes him knowledgeable about the bank’s problems, but you could also argue that, like Bob Rubin, he’s had a hand in creating this monster. Some commentators have noted that Parsons is close to Obama; since banking today may rely more on Beltway Rolodexes than on loan officers, that connection may top all else.

Citi isn’t the only bank looking unstable. Ken Lewis dumped John Thain overboard yesterday, after it became clear that Merrill had brought not only the thundering herd to Bank of America, but a whopping amount of bad assets as well. 

820 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

f p
Of course he doesn’t and the Economy is going to be his toughest challenge—If Paulson had let transparency be the watchword of the day instead of non-accountability we’d be better off now just a bit. AS for Thain—he needed to be dumped and a damn sight sooner. The major banks, and I’ll keep saying this til I’m blue in the face, need to have their book audited and any toxic waste needs to be brought to the fore and if they can’t satisfy the Feds then those banks with an overwhelming amount of toxicity need to be nationalized and their assets sold off. Also banks are sitting in many cases on hills of bucks and need to start loaning again; that will help kick-start the econ,and it they won’t then the Fed needs to step in and find out why they’re not loaning. If necessary they need to be forced to loan. Sounds radical I know but what the hell else can we do as a nation to get these timid bankers to get off their dead butts and get business working again.
By f p on 01/23/2009 11:29 am
Diana T
President Obama has said over and over that this crisis—indeed all of the crisis’— aren’t going away anytime soon. We’re going to have to cut him some slack. I can’t imagine the mess he’s walked into. My prediction is that the whole financial system, banks, Wall Street, Main Street, retail, etc. will never be the same as it was…not in my lifetime. There will be drastic changes and, thankfully, new rules and benchmarks.
By Diana T on 01/23/2009 11:36 am
f p
Di, I hope there will be—he’s going to need time for his plans to work and I’m certain that modifications and changes will take place with those plans—we have to be patient but the banks need to start loaning again. Their timidity is doing nothing but slowing the econ even more.
By f p on 01/23/2009 11:53 am
immoddesta godessa
Here here !!! Diana I’m thinking the grand old days of wanton consumerism is the modern day “dust bowl” the hard times ahead are going to be slim pickin’s! there’s gonna be 0 0 credit to purchase anything for an awful long time and building more freeways may employ some but there ain’t going to be many that can get into the new green auto of the future! Look out below! Crash is just beginning! like slow motion when the adrenaline kicks in at the moment we hit the brakes in panic. Brace for impact! The Chinese are flush with cash but they must prop up their own economy now and they have three times the numbers of consumers to buy their crap! Remember bananas? think global eat local! James Howard Kunsler in the “Long Emergency” lays it out pretty effectively what our Petro history has provided and what can be anticipated after peak oil! chec out “Clusterfuck Nation” on mondays to get Jim’s current rants, but by all means read TLE! Sayanara suburbs! What are we fighting for? the right to go shopping of course!
By immoddesta godessa on 01/24/2009 3:58 pm
Diana T
You may think it’s amusing that you are fighting to go shopping. But, that’s not what I’m fighting for. I’m doing what I can for my children’s and my grandchildren’s future.
By Diana T on 01/25/2009 12:40 pm
immoddesta godessa
Lady Di! My sarcasm about shopping wasn’t well placed here I guess. I shop mostly at GOODWILL or other thrift stores. I don’t have time to read 12 papers a day and I was attempting too support your view that the slog ahead will be significant. As far as your children and grands, well old tech and slow food are as much of the future that they will need to know as solar panels and wind turbins! Electric cars will still be powered by coal! The “geography of Nowhere” tells what a dilemma we face if we dont convert grass to gardens and invest iin bike paths and rail! Mr.Obama is not an island , but her has ascended behind the efforts of a sea of people who need to countinue to be a rising tide to carry the weight of his mission. Major financial and social changes are in store, but local community has got to be the focus of his overall solutions.
By immoddesta godessa on 01/26/2009 11:39 am
James the Game
Right, D.T. I can’t believe all the naysayers jumping on “O” the first week. Please, it may take five years to turn around this quagmire.
By James the Game on 01/25/2009 11:59 am
Diana T
They are attempting to spread the impression that he’s behind and that he’s going to fail. That’s for the ‘12 campaign. I think it’s going to take a lot of adjustment for the press,as well as us, that we haven’t had a Real Professional in the Oval Office for a very long time. And that we haven’t had a highly professional staff for even longer. If you remember, the Clinton West Wing was run in a very sloppy and unprofessional manner. The Obama/Emmanuel team are All Business, no playing around, and it’s going to take the media as well as the rest of us to make the adjustment. In addition, the Media realizes—probably has always known—that they were much too easy on the Bush administration about going through the layers to give us correct information on his major decisions, so they are going swing in the opposite direction in this administration. I don’t know what it’s going to take for people to understand that Obama has tried to make it very clear that we are in for a Very Rough Ride. I tell people around me that one has to crack eggs to make omelets and Obama has walked into a whole mess and, god only knows what he is facing. I will assure you that it is much worse, probably, than even he anticipated. So….I will read my 12 papers daily, my select commentators and a whole bunch of think tanks that tend to give all the sides on issues. And, books—lots of books. Whatever the media says, we will have to make some serious sacrifices.
By Diana T on 01/25/2009 12:38 pm
Diana T
By Diana T on 01/25/2009 12:45 pm
James the Game
That’s something else, DT!
By James the Game on 01/25/2009 1:10 pm
Diana T
I still maintain that the professional standard dropped so low that we have gotten used to mediocrity, and now that playtime is over, it’s down to pure business. One thing for sure…I wouldn’t want to be in that Oval Office and all the mess that was left to clean up…
By Diana T on 01/25/2009 1:28 pm
James the Game
Literally, if you’re referring to Clinton’s tryst with Monica Crowl….er, Lewinsky! But, yeah, it’s been a joke for a long time, and the joke’s been on us, without doubt.
By James the Game on 01/25/2009 1:33 pm
Diana T
No, actually, James, I was thinking about his West Wing, which was a largely casually run office that left a lot to be desired. Had nothing to do with Clinton’s tryst(s).
By Diana T on 01/25/2009 2:28 pm
James the Game
I was joking, DT. But I hear ya.
By James the Game on 01/25/2009 2:47 pm
Frannie Em
James I was wondering where you were. Haven’t seen you in a while and wanted to make sure you were doing okay. I don’t expect President Obama to be able to turn anything around too soon, but he is working on it. He worked on Saturday, and the whole week before. Inauguration day he wasn’t behind the desk and it was a wonderful day for him, but so long and then he was up the very next day at it again. He looks very tired. I don’t want him to burn out. I just want steady progress to a lasting solution. We need some quick fixes for small business because they are having to let go of a lot of people and they don’t have large corporations behind them, nor can they get bailouts. What I think that most people don’t realize is that he can lead, but congress has the clout because it is a body of representatives from all over the country. They push and they bargain and deal and double deal. I just don’t see why the bailout has to be so large and it doesn’t address the mortgage crisis well, or do much for housing starts. Housing starts are the big thing.
By Frannie Em on 01/26/2009 12:25 am