Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 09/12/2008 1:30 pm

Liz Peek on the Credit Crunch: We Are Still in the Eye of the Storm

By Liz Peek
© Shutterstock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 9/8)

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist. 

The Pope is apparently praying for the survival of Alitalia, Italy’s national airline that is on the brink of bankruptcy. I wonder if he’s available to put in a good word for Lehman, Merrill and some of the other financials? Without a doubt, they could use a little divine intervention.

At the moment, the heavens are not being very cooperative, as yet another hurricane threatens not only the Gulf Coast, but also Wall Street. As Houston and Galveston hunker down to prepare for Ike, traders are trying to fend off strong winds swirling around Lehman Brothers. Even for old-timers in the business, the possible collapse of the nation’s fourth-largest investment bank is unthinkable.

When will it end? Judging from the sell-off yesterday and today in Merrill Lynch, AIG and Washington Mutual shares, we are still in the eye of the storm. Ironically, there is some sense that the housing crisis has peaked. Though foreclosures continue to rise, they do so at a lessening pace. Still, the numbers are staggering. One in every 416 households in the U.S. has received some foreclosure notice. The problem is highly concentrated in four states: California (which accounts for fully one third of the foreclosures), Arizona, Florida and Nevada. In other words, the foreclosure rate does not indicate widespread financial woes as much as crazily speculative development.

The problem with Lehman — and more broadly with the financial services industry — is a lack of transparency. Wall Street is not quite clear on the toxicity of Lehman’s assets. You have to assume that they hold more troubled loans and securities than we know, or else someone would surely have stepped in to buy the storied firm. The authorities surely know what’s on Lehman’s books; the Fed has been in the firm monitoring its trading on a daily basis. They have the right to do so since Lehman has been accessing the Treasury borrowing facility that was made available to the investment banks right after Bear Stearns went under. That credit line was supposed to prevent any other firms from collapse; its failure to do so is but one unimaginable aspect of the current drama.

It is assumed that this weekend a deal will be struck, either with Bank of America or Barclays. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has said that the government will not backstop a sale as it did in the case of Bear Stearns. After taking charge of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae last weekend, Paulson no doubt fears adding even more to the Treasury’s exposure to the housing debacle. Already some in Congress are noisily criticizing Paulson’s proactive approach. Since buyers are under no compulsion to buy Lehman, a lack of government support makes the situation fragile — and tense. I have never seen Wall Street more anxious.

Meanwhile, today’s report that retail sales fell 0.3% added to concerns that the rest of the economy is struggling. If you strip out gasoline where prices dropped (a GOOD thing!), all other retail outlays were flat. This is not too surprising, given the impact on the preceding months of the income tax rebate.

Retail sales figures confirm the majority view that the economy is slowing. Rising exports have boosted growth so far this year, thanks to a weak dollar. However, as economic gains in Europe and the third world subside, and the dollar rises in value, exports may falter. Sluggish consumer spending will continue to stem from anxiety about home prices, and from a weak jobs market. On the other side of the ledger is a fall-off in oil prices, which will temper any decline in spending.

All the conflicting pluses and minuses are hard to keep in mind. But here’s the one fact that is unassailable: Consumer spending in recent years was buoyed up by a massive onetime-only drawdown of home equity. We all know people who borrowed against the increased value of their homes, assuming that the rise in prices would go on and on. While the increase in their home price probably vanished, the debt remains. That, in my view, is the single most enduring factor that will moderate growth in the U.S. for some time. That’s not to say that we can’t see the market move higher, or that real growth won’t resume. It is simply a factor which boosted several years’ performance, and which will not help us going forward.

18 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

K O
Hi Liz, Beautiful synopsis of a very dismal week. Thanks for that. Hey, here’s a tip. If you go to Barron’s in the Market Laborator section, and look in the Bond section for Top Savings Deposit Yields, you’ll find that immediately prior to their demise, Indy Mac was paying the highest rate in the country for CD’s. Who’s on top now? Why, it’s Washington Mutual. Seems that, with little data in, a predictive factor for trouble is overpaying for CDs. More to follow… By the way, Liz, after reading Tom Friedman’s latest book, I’ve begrudgingly moved from a hard line “no market involvement” capitalist position to agreement with you that an artificially high gasoline rate IS a good idea. I rarely agree with the strategy of artifical prices, but the data supporting your position is overwhelming. Thanks for raising a timely financial policy point so eloquently. And, finally, with respect you your last point, China still owns $501 billion in our public debt, right? Maybe we can reconsider the method of repayment of that debt…
By K O on 09/12/2008 1:32 pm
Diana T
Thank you, Kitty, for validating an opinion I have been having for about 2 weeks now. I am just starting Friedman’s book. I see now the virtue of artificially keeping gas prices at a higher rate. Did you read his commentary today in the NY Times? I really think it is essential reading. As is their article on the various collapses getting ready to happen. I really hate to say this, but I think we are heading towards a perfect storm situation that is un-precedented. I am trying to figure out how to instruct my advisor tomorrow in order to protect what meager holdings I have as of this moment, not trying to predict what will be going on in even a month. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/business/14spiral.html?ref=business
By Diana T on 09/14/2008 1:17 pm
Diana T
Well, Kitty, that answers that. In the past 20 minutes this has popped up on my homepage. Now what? http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=abNGaeBmMNYw&refer=e…
By Diana T on 09/14/2008 1:26 pm
Barbara Taylor
Our senators at work. Sounds like the problem with the economy is the fault of both parties.
By Barbara Taylor on 09/12/2008 1:42 pm
Rainbow Power
What is the status of the 2nd stimulus package? I think the Republicans have tried to nix it for fear that this Democrat proposal would outshine the announcement of Palin on the ticket. On the Fannie Mae and the Freddie Mac, won’t we, as taxpayers eventually be stuck with paying for this bail-out? How much more can taxpayers bear?
By Rainbow Power on 09/12/2008 2:36 pm
K O
Hi Rainbow, As much as I hate to say this, I agree with the strategy for FNMA and FHLMAC. It’s the loans that are being protected - not the stockholders - and without that protection, the ultimate price would be much higher in the unwinding of confidence, the destruction of the housing market and the ancillary effects on other financial institutions. This was, in my opinion, the best (and least costly) alternative, but it was the best of a selection of alternatives that included nothing good.
By K O on 09/12/2008 2:55 pm
Diana T
What happens, Kitty, if we get into a Domino situation with foreign countries so invested in our Treasuries? I think you watched Rubin and Summers on Charlie Rose the other night. Do you remember one of them saying what a lie it is to promise permanet tax cuts? Because soon or later we are going to have to pay for this debacle, and so, it will be on the backs of my grandchildren’s generation. At least, that’s how I see it.
By Diana T on 09/14/2008 1:21 pm
Diana T
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/14/greenspan-this-is-the-wor_n_126… Kitty, I heard Paul Volcker warning about this very thing last winter.
By Diana T on 09/14/2008 1:23 pm
Chrome Toe
Holy shit… awarded to CHINA? And with the help of our own senators??? I can’t even tell you how mind boggled I am by this.
By Chrome Toe on 09/12/2008 4:08 pm
mary lou s
kelly, one of the senators mentioned is my senator, who is running for reelection. he has been opposed to invading iraq from before bush did it. i would like to hear levin’s version of events before i judge. and anyway, liz seemed at first to be talking about iran but later seemed to be talking about iraq. sort of like mccain’s iraq-pakistani border.
By mary lou s on 09/13/2008 12:38 am
beth willis
As am I, Kelly. As am I. Here in Texas (I am in North Texas, receiving only much needed rain) Hurricane Ike has ravaged the Gulf Coast where the majority of oil refineries of the country are located. Of course, the priority at this time is the safety of the citizens of lower Southest Texas. The extent of the damage to the refinineries, estimates for repairs and the attendant effects on the overall economy are devastating (a much overused word, but accurate, I believe, in this situation). Atlanta is already reported to be bumping up prices to $5 a gallon. Stations along the evacuation route out of Houston quickly raised their prices. Hopefully, the government will step in to stop the gouging, but to hear this news that Iraq has sold their oil to China is mystifying. Why always the absolutist approach in government? Why could these senators not help negotiate a sale that benefitted both China and the United States.? And have the Iraqis budgeted for development of infrastructure in their country, or is that at our expense as well? To me, this is a John Carpenter horror story, and I don’t choose to watch horror stories, particularly when I have to pay for them. How frightened should I be? Peace and grace
By beth willis on 09/13/2008 2:15 pm
Brooklyn Gal
I’m confused on this China deal. Was there a bidding process? Is the USA locked out from future deals? Or was it just that China got the first deal?
By Brooklyn Gal on 09/12/2008 6:17 pm
G T
An interesting article I read just today about the current status of Health Care in the US. In 1960 $1 of every $20 in the national budget went to health care. In 2007 is has increased to $1 in every $6..By 2025 it is projected to be $1 in every $4..and that is the projected cost of Obama AND McCains plans. Imagine 1/4th of the entire National budget being spent on Health Care and no assurance of the quality of that care. This is at the expense of all other government programs. If someone would explain to me the financial details of Obama’s Health Care plan and program, I would be very interested to know what that is. How does he intend to pay for another 45 million people covered? and how much will it cost and what will be the quality of that care. Is there a provision for the added number of doctors, nurses and medical facilities to accomodate that much more demand? A family member who is a Nurse works in an Emergency room at a big hospital. They are overwhelmed every single day now with more and more people coming into the ER for medical care. Not emergency situations but routine things like stomach aches, headaches, etc. The hospital has no empty beds available and there is the possibility that they will close down their ER since they have no place to put real emergencies that come in. This is a huge hospital but they, and the other hospitals in the area seem to be overwhelmed. This whole issue is enormously complex. I would like to hear some real accurate information about what will be done under that Health Care plan that covers every person in the US. Will we train more doctors and nurses? Who will pay for that and how much? Lets talk issues here…I see Ted Kennedy said medical care should be a “right”…Is that part of Obama’s plan?
By G T on 09/12/2008 8:32 pm
K O
Hi GT, According to the latest Tax Policy Center analysis, “Senator McCain proposes to replace the current income tax exclusion of employer-paid health insurance premiums with a refundable income tax credit of $2,500 for individual coverage or $5,000 for family coverage, whether acquired at work or purchased in the individual nongroup market. (The current exclusion of employer-paid premiums from payroll taxes would continue.) He would also establish a special high-risk pool to enable individuals with chronic health conditions to purchase health insurance. Senator Obama would provide subsidies that decrease with income for low- and middle-income families to help them purchase insurance in a new nongroup purchasing pool, mandate health insurance coverage for children, penalize employers who fail to provide health insurance to their employees, expand public health insurance programs for poor children and families, and provide subsidies for small employers that offer health insurance. Senator Obama’s plan would reduce the number of uninsured Americans by about 18 million in 2009, and 34 million in 2018. Almost all children would have coverage because the law would require it, but nearly 33 million adults would still lack coverage in 2018. Senator McCain’s plan would have far more modest effects, reducing the number of uninsured by just over 1 million in 2009, rising to a maximum of almost 5 million in 2013, after which the number of uninsured would creep upward because the tax credits grow more slowly than premiums. Both plans are highly progressive, although Senator Obama’s plan targets subsidies more toward low- and middle-income households and is thus significantly more progressive than Senator McCain’s proposal.” Hope that answers your question. Full analysis can be found at http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411749_updated_candidates.pdf
By K O on 09/12/2008 10:59 pm
G T
Thank you Kitty OKeefe…I appreciate your information. I stilll have many unanswered questions. Im talking to people who are down there “in the trenches on the front line of medical care” so just how these plans will work as more than just a nice idea is of considerable interest. I hope some of the fraud and corruption that the McCain camp is talking about clearing out of government includes the huge amount of fraud and wasteful spending in the current Medicare and Mediaid programs. I would like to know a lot more about this issue as I think it is THE most expensive one on the agenda .
By G T on 09/13/2008 11:54 am