Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 08/01/2008 1:15 pm

Liz Peek: Now is a Good Time to Buy Stocks

By Liz Peek
© Shutterstock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 7/28)

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist.

Poor John Thain. The CEO of Merrill Lynch is probably thinking wistfully of the days not so long ago when, as head of the New York Stock Exchange, all he had to do was corral a bunch of ornery traders and try to vault the exchange into the 21st century. This week he has been raked over the coals for posting the worst trade of the financial crisis to date, when he sold a $30.6 billion portfolio to private equity behemoth Lone Star Funds for $1.68 billion in actual cash. On the face of it, the CDOs sold for about 22 cents on the dollar; it took Wall Street about a nanosecond to figure out that since Merrill was actually financing the transaction, and that it stood liable for losses on the loans, the actual price was more like 5 cents on the dollar. Ouch! Were the CDOs really that bad? What was Thain thinking?

My take is that Thain is trying desperately (this was indeed that kind of act) to get Merrill out from under its exposure to mortgages and everything related, and focused back on its core businesses. This is a great, international franchise; to have all your workers demoralized by a sinking stock and your clients worried about your survival is a terrible load to carry. So, the stock market gave him a drubbing, in part because he had to sell yet more shares to shore up the stricken balance sheet, but presumably the company has seen the worst. And it was very, very bad.

Investors are hoping that the distressed sale will mark the bottom. And it well might. The initial fear was that everyone else that owned similar securities would have to mark like portfolios down, but that fear may be overblown. In any case, the financials have traded higher over the week, and are up 37% from the low hit on July 15 when Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae collapsed.

That bounce is inspiring some talk about the basic winning trade of the past year – shorting financials and buying energy – being over. Despite a jump in oil prices midweek (and again today – but somehow lacking conviction), they are clearly off substantially from the high point ($147) reached a month ago. The softening economy and obvious shift in consumption patterns is cutting into demand. All of a sudden, the seemingly inevitable march to $150 or even $200 per barrel has faltered. Americans are really changing their behavior. Miles driven in the United States are now down 3.7% so far this year. Higher prices are not just impacting the U.S.; Japanese oil-product sales in June fell 5.5%, with gasoline consumption off 9%.

Otherwise, the economic news continues soft but not terrible. Despite Alan Greenspan’s continuing contentions on CNBC that we’re about to slide into recession (will someone please muzzle that man?), it hasn’t actually happened yet. One reason is that the cheap dollar is boosting exports – trade added a remarkable 2.4% to real GDP growth in the second quarter. Also, businesses are being conservative and drawing down inventories, which means that the 1.8% year-over-year growth in second quarter GDP was actually pretty good.

Overall, this is a tough time, all because of a housing bubble which got way out of hand. Going forward, the United States is going to have to decide how important home ownership is, and to what degree we want to support the opportunity for Americans to buy their own homes. After this recent collapse, the country’s appetite for backstopping organizations like Freddie and Fannie may have waned. My view is that these companies are expected to serve two masters – the shareholders and the public good – and that this bifurcated mission is all but impossible.

56 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Kathrine Gluvna
Thank you very much.
By Kathrine Gluvna on 08/01/2008 12:56 pm
K O
Hi Liz, and thank you for yet another synopsis on the roller coaster that is Wall St. I agree that Greenspan should be muzzled, but as long as he’s married to Andrea Martin he’ll have access to the media and will continue taking not very veiled pot shots at his successor. Too bad he wasn’t as forthcoming during his own tenure at the Fed. I agree it’s a great time to buy stocks, and continue to find it ironic to have spent my life in a business where no one wants to buy when there’s a sale.
By K O on 08/01/2008 1:29 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Kitty–think that is Andrea Mitchell
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 08/02/2008 10:30 am
K O
Hi Phyllis, You’re absolutly right. Andrea Martin is one of my favorite Second City actresses - and definitely not married to Greenspan. I’m terrible with names. I think I called Kathy Griffin “Kathy Griffith” a while back, too. You can probably see why I majored in math and not English. Thanks for the correction.
By K O on 08/02/2008 1:36 pm
Liz Peek
Hi Kitty- aren’t you right? It’s all about fear. I try to remind myself that the really great investors - like John Templeton and Warren Buffett, are the ones who go where others fear to tread. It’s hard when the entire financial media sound so negative (read this weekend’s Barron’s for instance) but the main thing is that the market anticipates developments so far in advance! So- we have to be thinking 12 months out, and I do think the cycle will have turned. Best- Liz
By Liz Peek on 08/03/2008 8:32 am
K O
Hi Liz, It may be interesting to discuss systemic (and sector) risk versus inflation risk, since that subject was raised further out on this thread. I think, with women living longer, earning less and taking an average of 11 years from their worklife dedicated to family care, the risk of inflation (and taxes) eradicating the value of so-called safe investments versus long term potential returns in the capital markets would be a discussion worth having, no? I’ve been away for a while, but saw an article about Skype by a young lady who shares your surname when I was catching up on my reading. Is that your daughter? If so, please tell her I think she’s a smartypants.
By K O on 08/03/2008 1:34 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
For the moment, I will be more likely to buy socks. They are less likely to disappoint and much more affordable. On the other end of the financial spectrum, a legendary homeless advocate passed away this week. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/01/BAG0122RLQ.D… The people she helped in Contra Costa County are so sad. I have long been a bit puzzled that so much money is spent by the government to prop up the homeownership end of the housing market, and so little to help veterans who are sleeping under bridges. The rents are rising precipitously all over because the foreclosures are forcing families into the rental market and renters are trapped because mortgages are harder to get. And the homeless, well, do think of the homeless this week, if only to honor Susan Prather.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 08/01/2008 2:04 pm
DeBúrca obj
Damn, but I’ve used all my extra money meant for purchasing stock to buy gas and food!
By DeBúrca obj on 08/01/2008 2:38 pm
Diana T
Gosh, I know what you mean DeB. And, while the Exxons and the Chevrons are making those profits, even though they say they aren’t as much as they thought they would be. ahhhhh.
By Diana T on 08/01/2008 3:09 pm
Frank Peterson
Right—lessee 11.5 billion last quarter? Right! Tll us about big oil.
By Frank Peterson on 08/01/2008 6:06 pm
Diana T
http://deepblade.net/journal/2005/09/peak-oil-supporting-links.html Frank and DeB, This makes for very interesting reading. I printed the Mergers, Manipulation and Mirages; it’s in PDF and was written in Mar. 2004. This all concerns the domestic gasoline markets and the high prices. I look forward to hearing your opinions, and any one elses.
By Diana T on 08/01/2008 9:46 pm
Frank Peterson
Diana this is going to take a bit—I’ll post on it later after I’ve absorbed it—probably tomorrow—I’m tired right now and my brain is bleching on me :-)
By Frank Peterson on 08/01/2008 9:55 pm
DeBúrca obj
Thanks Diana. I printed the Mergers, etc. pdf too and I’ll take a look at it this weekend.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/01/2008 10:41 pm
Diana T
DeB and Frank, when you have a minute, please listen to this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33stUPQIqc4&feature=related
By Diana T on 08/01/2008 9:58 pm
Frank Peterson
Listening now and what I’m hearing from the republican side is the same tired arguments that don’t cut ice as far as I’m concerned. So far the Dem side makes more sense for immediate relief. The Repubs want to open off shore drilling and that will have no immediate effect whatsoever that I’ve read about anyway. Again the SPR has been released before and it works.
By Frank Peterson on 08/01/2008 10:27 pm