Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 08/22/2008 9:00 am

Cher To Hillary: We Want You, Babe!

Clinton: photo by Barbara Kinney/Flickr.com; Cher: Getty

"I have only one firm belief about the American political system, and that is this: God is a Republican and Santa Claus is a Democrat," said P. J. O’Rourke.

——————————

What has happened on the pre-convention scene since last Wednesday has set political junkies on their ear! After he won the primary, Barack Obama looked like an unbeatable Democratic candidate. But, Sen. Hillary Clinton, who fought the good fight and emerged as an ever-more important and dynamic persona, would still not be his choice for vice president. Those of us Democrats who were for her — that is, the rational ones among us — accepted this fact and turned our support to Obama. He has many appealing qualities and his election is important to anyone who has their mind on the far right drift of the Supreme Court.

But then matters began to slide and this columnist has said on a number of recent occasions that if Obama wants to ensure his election, he needs to look again at Hillary. (I said this last Tuesday on CNN’s "American Morning" with John Roberts. Click here to watch the clip.) I also remarked on the unpleasant reality — to many — of Sen. Clinton’s famous husband’s omnipresence. But I believe it won’t be a factor. I think she would force him to butt out! Her loss in the primary taught her a great lesson and I know this for a fact.

——————————

Nobody paid a bit of attention to my chiding Obama to take Hillary as a precaution, if not as the best of a lot of dreary choices. Then Wednesday night, following Ralph Nader’s astonishing prediction that just what we’ve said here should happen, would  happen —  all the talking heads on TV began a drumbeat — it should be, it will be Hillary, Hillary, Hillary!  And as Obama’s polls shortened the distance between him and John McCain, people said this more and more.

So you won’t be surprised to learn that one of the most famous superstars the ’60s, ’70s, ’80s, ’90s — now on her eternal comeback career — telephoned us entirely on her own initiative to have her say.

If you don’t care about celebs endorsing politicians, then so be it. If you are curious — read on.

——————————

My phone rings midday Wednesday. A slightly hoarse, husky woman’s voice says, "Liz? Do you know who this is?" The voice is familiar, but I can’t be sure. Am I in an old American Express commercial? I hate guessing games. "No, who is this?" I reply with more acerbity than intended. "Oh, I love when people don’t know. Liz, it’s Cher!" Indeed it is Cher, fighting a strained throat, courtesy of her ongoing Las Vegas gig.

Cher says, "I have something I want to tell you." Visions of wedding invitations or a Korean baby adoption dance through my head. "Yes?" Cher gives with the big reveal, with no preamble: "If Barack Obama does not pick Hillary Clinton as his running mate, he is going to lose this election." I start to respond, but Cher is on a roll "I think millions won’t vote. And not just the ‘uneducated, blue-collar women,’ as the media condescendingly refers to Hillary supporters."

Cher, it seems, has decided to take no prisoners on this one. She is certainty itself. "He can’t win without her. No other running mate can help him. He needs her. She is formidable in ways he is not — at least not yet." I venture then the caution that Republicans have a standing "Get Hillary" campaign ready to go. Cher snorts: "There is nothing more to be said about her. She and Bill Clinton have been the victim of every ghastly accusation. They have
survived."

Of Obama, Cher says: "I like him. He is a good person. Intelligent and thoughtful. But he comes off as too thoughtful. We don’t need a verbose and contemplative president. We need  a roll-up-your-sleeves-get-down-there kind of person. Hillary was and is that kind of person. She was the best choice to be president. But that’s not gonna’ happen right now. So the next best thing is she’s gotta’ be there to help him. You can’t win an election on a bumper sticker about ‘change.’ Every politician
promises change! What’s new?"

189 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Sherrie Crews
Bravo, as usual, to Cher. I wish I could think she’s wrong, but I don’t believe she is and it scares me. I know the media is the reason Hillary lost primaries to Obama. I also know they’re beginning to turn on Obama because of McCain’s (republican party’s) whining to the corporate barons that control the media. Besides that the filthy mud-slinging lies of Corsi and his ilk make for much juicier sensationalism.
By Sherrie Crews on 08/22/2008 8:49 am
Lucinda Herbert
Cher has dinner with Paul Begala and former President Bill Clinton in Vegas, and then she puts in a call to you???? Liz, with no disrespect to you, but come on????!!!!??? So this is the Clintons latest effort to sway the public???? What is this country coming to??? Hillary and Bill would be nothing but a burden to Obama and his cabinet. They have already hijacked the convention! And, for them to think that women vote for women simply because they are women demonstrates how out of touch they are with most women in this country. Hillary lost because of Hillary … and Bill. I recommend that Cher go back to entertaining and perhaps give Paul Begala a job as a dancer or back-up singer because his political instincts have beome obsolete.
By Lucinda Herbert on 08/22/2008 12:53 pm
DeBúrca obj
In a way it shows a lot of disrespect toward the women’s vote. To think that just before Obama is set to announce his choice, Bill Clinton and Paul Begala would run to Cher in order to get her to speak out for Hillary… as though woman put so little thought into their vote that they will believe if Cher says she won’t vote for Obama if Hillary is not on the ticket, that we had better be scared. Also, Obama says he has already made his choice, and if that choice happens to be Joe Biden, I think it is very disrespectful on the part of Bill Clinton and Paul Begala toward Biden for them go down this route of trying to strong arm Obama to choose Hillary at this point in time. It sort of makes peoples point that Hillary has no control over Bill and if she got the VP spot he would have his hands in everything. Personally I will vote for Obama whether he chooses Biden or Clinton, I just want it to be his choice.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 1:08 pm
Maizie James
DeBúrca, I don’t believe for one minute that any intelligent woman would fall for a deliberate ploy which suggest that, “if Cher says she won’t vote for Obama if Hillary is not on the ticket, that we had better be scared.” It’s not going to happen I give no credibility to Cher’s endorsement of Hillary for Vice President, than I did to Oprah’s endorsement of Obama for President. They are both celebrities with opinions; no more, no less. However, should someone ‘qualified, like Colin Powell, or Al Gore, for example endorse either candidate, you bet I’ll listen.
By Maizie James on 08/22/2008 2:18 pm
DeBúrca obj
I agree with you completely… but apparently Bill Clinton and Paul Begala think we women vote that way!
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 3:25 pm
Diana T
Maybe they just want to hang out with Cher.
By Diana T on 08/22/2008 11:47 pm
DeBúrca obj
Yes, I suppose that’s a possibility! I’ll bet they wish Cher hadn’t mentioned it.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/23/2008 8:00 am
DeBúrca obj
Diana, I’ll bet you’re happy about Biden! Thanks for the links to those Biden videos.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/23/2008 8:11 am
Linda Mason
I agree, but it’s even sadder to think that Bill Clinton, our ex-pres, having dinner with Cher! I loved this guy as our President, and supported him — strictly as President — through the end of his 2nd term despite my distaste for the abominable, crass behavior he could exhibit towards women. The idea of him seeking political favors from Cher as she seeks to make a come-back — it’s too depressing.
By Linda Mason on 08/22/2008 7:44 pm
DeBúrca obj
Agreed! I have always been a supporter of both Bill and Hillary and I am very disappointed in their behavior throughout much of this campaign. But hunger for power and facing the prospect of losing some of it must be more than they can stand if it’s come down to meeting with Cher a couple days before Obama plans to announce his pick! You’re right, it is depressing. I think Bill will get his credibility back, but only if he and Hillary begin to back Obama strongly throughout the rest of this campaign and during his term, hopefully, God willing, knock on wood, as president. I heard an editor from Slate magazine say that for Hillary to get some of her cred back she must give the “speech” equivalent of a french kiss to Obama at the Convention!
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 7:54 pm
Linda Mason
Personally, if HRC does not achieve her ultimate goal, I think that history will judge her as a classic, tragic figure — e.g., as tremendously gifted, but brought down by her own flaws. First, maybe her devotion to Bill, but that is her personal choice, and I don’t think the world can judge this. The 2nd is her all-consuming ambition, which clouds her judgment and her willingness to hear objective criticism. Having said that, many a man has achieved tremendous heights with equal flaws, but that does not mean the electorate needs to overlook them in her case.
By Linda Mason on 08/22/2008 8:37 pm
DeBúrca obj
And the electorate may not have had a problem with her had Obama not been in the race and offered an alternative. Most people who are for and were for Obama… were not “against” Hillary, they just wanted Obama. There is no crime in that nor is it sexist.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 8:51 pm
Buh- Bye
time will tell Lucinda, time will tell. Obama picked a deadbeat for a VP. we’ll see how far that gets him
By Buh- Bye on 08/23/2008 12:50 am
Lucinda Herbert
I disagree with you My Alias. Did you read David Brooks’ column? Biden offers Obama what he lacks … including Pennsylvania. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/22/opinion/22brooks.html?em
By Lucinda Herbert on 08/23/2008 12:32 pm
Dorothy W
The media wasn’t fair to Senator Obama either. Senator Clinton mostly lost the primary because of the type of campaign she ran. Put the blame where it belongs! Senator Clinton campaign was disfunctional and negative. She lost her base because of the negativity. She ran her campaign like the Far Right Republican Party. And as in the past, Senator Clinton and President Clinton are only thinking of themselves and not the Democratic Party. It’s strange why people are unabe to comprehend this fact. But instead choose to believe something that’s not true.
By Dorothy W on 08/22/2008 2:02 pm