Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 08/22/2008 9:00 am

Cher To Hillary: We Want You, Babe!

Clinton: photo by Barbara Kinney/Flickr.com; Cher: Getty

"I have only one firm belief about the American political system, and that is this: God is a Republican and Santa Claus is a Democrat," said P. J. O’Rourke.

——————————

What has happened on the pre-convention scene since last Wednesday has set political junkies on their ear! After he won the primary, Barack Obama looked like an unbeatable Democratic candidate. But, Sen. Hillary Clinton, who fought the good fight and emerged as an ever-more important and dynamic persona, would still not be his choice for vice president. Those of us Democrats who were for her — that is, the rational ones among us — accepted this fact and turned our support to Obama. He has many appealing qualities and his election is important to anyone who has their mind on the far right drift of the Supreme Court.

But then matters began to slide and this columnist has said on a number of recent occasions that if Obama wants to ensure his election, he needs to look again at Hillary. (I said this last Tuesday on CNN’s "American Morning" with John Roberts. Click here to watch the clip.) I also remarked on the unpleasant reality — to many — of Sen. Clinton’s famous husband’s omnipresence. But I believe it won’t be a factor. I think she would force him to butt out! Her loss in the primary taught her a great lesson and I know this for a fact.

——————————

Nobody paid a bit of attention to my chiding Obama to take Hillary as a precaution, if not as the best of a lot of dreary choices. Then Wednesday night, following Ralph Nader’s astonishing prediction that just what we’ve said here should happen, would  happen —  all the talking heads on TV began a drumbeat — it should be, it will be Hillary, Hillary, Hillary!  And as Obama’s polls shortened the distance between him and John McCain, people said this more and more.

So you won’t be surprised to learn that one of the most famous superstars the ’60s, ’70s, ’80s, ’90s — now on her eternal comeback career — telephoned us entirely on her own initiative to have her say.

If you don’t care about celebs endorsing politicians, then so be it. If you are curious — read on.

——————————

My phone rings midday Wednesday. A slightly hoarse, husky woman’s voice says, "Liz? Do you know who this is?" The voice is familiar, but I can’t be sure. Am I in an old American Express commercial? I hate guessing games. "No, who is this?" I reply with more acerbity than intended. "Oh, I love when people don’t know. Liz, it’s Cher!" Indeed it is Cher, fighting a strained throat, courtesy of her ongoing Las Vegas gig.

Cher says, "I have something I want to tell you." Visions of wedding invitations or a Korean baby adoption dance through my head. "Yes?" Cher gives with the big reveal, with no preamble: "If Barack Obama does not pick Hillary Clinton as his running mate, he is going to lose this election." I start to respond, but Cher is on a roll "I think millions won’t vote. And not just the ‘uneducated, blue-collar women,’ as the media condescendingly refers to Hillary supporters."

Cher, it seems, has decided to take no prisoners on this one. She is certainty itself. "He can’t win without her. No other running mate can help him. He needs her. She is formidable in ways he is not — at least not yet." I venture then the caution that Republicans have a standing "Get Hillary" campaign ready to go. Cher snorts: "There is nothing more to be said about her. She and Bill Clinton have been the victim of every ghastly accusation. They have
survived."

Of Obama, Cher says: "I like him. He is a good person. Intelligent and thoughtful. But he comes off as too thoughtful. We don’t need a verbose and contemplative president. We need  a roll-up-your-sleeves-get-down-there kind of person. Hillary was and is that kind of person. She was the best choice to be president. But that’s not gonna’ happen right now. So the next best thing is she’s gotta’ be there to help him. You can’t win an election on a bumper sticker about ‘change.’ Every politician
promises change! What’s new?"

189 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
Do you realize that simply by filling our tires to the correct weight the US would save as much on gas as we would get from drilling ANWAR in 15 years? It may sound simple but it’s a fact.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 3:49 pm
James the Game
Nothing simple about it, DeB’. Under-inflated tires reduce gas mileage dramatically on any vehicle. Cheers.
By James the Game on 08/22/2008 4:21 pm
C Hardy
Ok but that is assuming we already dont have them at the correct weight…I know I do on mine b/c I drive an hour one way to work each day & so saving on gas is one of my main priorities, other than getting there safely. But Im sorry its not something that is going to happen overnight if everyone ran out now to make their tires the correct size…it would take years for it to save as much gas as we would get from drilling….
By C Hardy on 08/22/2008 8:42 pm
DeBúrca obj
CO this is just a statistical fact. Some people may have them at the correct weight, but as a whole if the entire country, tomorrow, checked their tires and filled them to the correct weight and kept them there, our gas consumption would decrease as a country the same percentage, as our oil production would increase from drilling ANWAR in FIFTEEN YEARS. So, I don’t understand how anyone could suggest that doing so is a joke. And you do realize, that if we were to give the ok to drill ANWAR tomorrow , the crude could begin flowing by 2013 and reach a peak of 876,000 barrels a day by 2025… which would provide us only approx. 3.5% more oil.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/22/2008 8:59 pm
Suzanne O
I now believe that although we all have the right to vote, enough procedures have been put in place to elect the candidate the individual party wants in office. I think voting is simply an excercise to make us feel like we have a choice. Too many people vote on the candidate they ” like” because of something they see or hear on TV or something a celebrity says or their friend told them, etc. Between the delegate votes, the caucases and the electoral college. Do ” we the people ” really decide who wins in a presidential election ?
By Suzanne O on 08/22/2008 3:07 pm
Marjorie C.
Suzanne, we suggest, that’s about it.
By Marjorie C. on 08/22/2008 5:26 pm
Linda Mason
There are things people can do to help their preferred candidate win besides voting. Marjorie: did your state hold a Democratic caucus? If so, did you participate and vote for HRC? Did you work on HRC’s primary campaign? How often? Did you donate to her campaign? Did you work on it weekly, since April of 2007 through the entire primary season, as I did for Obama’s campaign? Please, I’m very interested.
By Linda Mason on 08/22/2008 8:52 pm
~ countrywoman ~
Linda Mason, More power to you, and your ability to boil the issue right down to its essence! (I have been fairly active too, but your level of dedication puts me to shame.) The reason Obama won the primary is revealed in your post. A HUGE thank you for all you have done in this campaign. I bet every WowSister who feels invested our candidate will read your post and feel a surge of respect, gratitude, and inspiration. I sure did!
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 08/22/2008 10:05 pm
Marjorie C.
Linda, I’ll answer your questions, but I’ll also remind you that I’m a registered independent voter — I have no party affiliation. 1. did your state hold a Democratic caucus? no 2. Did you work on HRC’s primary campaign? no 3. Did you donate to her campaign? no 4. Did you work on it weekly, … no Of the three contenders (Hillary, McCain, Obama), I felt Hillary was the best candidate for the presidency. I was leery of McCain and downright leery of Obama. I’m not a Hillary hugger, per se. Now that she’s eliminated, I’ve moved on the the next guy who happens to be McCain.
By Marjorie C. on 08/23/2008 9:06 am
Linda Mason
Marjorie—Well, the you lack any cred to complain about the outcome of the primaries, despite being an “Independent.” That would not prohibit you from working on HRC’s campaign, or donating to it. Trust me — the HRC campaign was not turning away any $ or warm bodies who were willing to work for her just because the donor or worker happened to be “Independent.” If you thought she was the best candidate, and concerned at the prospect that Obama would win, you should have been involved. Instead you prefer to sit at your computer and talk trash about Obama. Well, if you are dissatisfied with the nominees, you have yourself to blame.
By Linda Mason on 08/23/2008 10:18 am
Marjorie C.
Linda, okay you can blame me. I voted for Hillary on Super Tuesday and that’s it. I watched with horror how she was treated by the media, sometimes even PBS. Not sure what I could have done to change anything because once she turned things around (and the caucuses were behind her) she did very well on her own. One correction, I do not trash talk Obama. And all the insults you toss at me will not change my mind: I will vote for McCain.
By Marjorie C. on 08/23/2008 12:19 pm
~ countrywoman ~
Marjorie C…….Obviously you have a different definition of “trash talk” than some of us. It appears that you were being challenged and questioned, and considered that to be insulting. Apparently we all have a different idea of what constitutes an insult too. I found it unequivocally insulting when you declared all who put our faith in Obama to be “pathetic.” (07/26/2008) Trash talk? Did this Obama supporter misinterpret your intention and feel offended in error?
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 08/23/2008 1:36 pm
Buh- Bye
Hang in there, Marjorie. There’s quite a stream of personal attacks coming from a few of the Obama followers. Sometimes they post a quickie apology right after they slash you so they don’t get booted from the site. But you have the right to voice your opinions, and I pretty much agree with all of yours. You are in good company from the other posts I’ve read around the site too. You have to have a thick skin with this group. This week alone Linda Mason has informed me that she and her 85 yr. old mother have “better creds” than I in the feminist movement (and she has never met me.) She also told me I was using Obama as a “surrogate target” for my apparent “anger against men.” DeBurca was also on that bandwagon referring to me as bitter and saying “Wherever your anger comes from, you’d better be careful what you wish for…” Boy, sure ain’t the old Democratic Party of the past, is it?
By Buh- Bye on 08/23/2008 8:53 pm
Susan Gabriel
Hi all, This topic certainly gets a lot of people riled up, myself included. I think Obama needs to choose a woman as a running mate, Hillary or someone else, or there is no true hope for change. I also think that women need to see themselves reflected in the highest office of the country before they can even catch a glimpse of what equality is. Hence the reason so many of us feel passionately about this issue. We’ve been waiting in line forever. It’s time to be admitted to the biggest ticket in town.
By Susan Gabriel on 08/22/2008 3:19 pm
Lorraine Bates
See, now, Susan, I think the biggest issue with the whole HRC/Obama debate and who women vote for is that many women - this one included - see more of themselves reflected in Obama than in Hillary.
By Lorraine Bates on 08/22/2008 9:34 pm