Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 08/22/2008 9:00 am

Cher To Hillary: We Want You, Babe!

Clinton: photo by Barbara Kinney/Flickr.com; Cher: Getty

"I have only one firm belief about the American political system, and that is this: God is a Republican and Santa Claus is a Democrat," said P. J. O’Rourke.

——————————

What has happened on the pre-convention scene since last Wednesday has set political junkies on their ear! After he won the primary, Barack Obama looked like an unbeatable Democratic candidate. But, Sen. Hillary Clinton, who fought the good fight and emerged as an ever-more important and dynamic persona, would still not be his choice for vice president. Those of us Democrats who were for her — that is, the rational ones among us — accepted this fact and turned our support to Obama. He has many appealing qualities and his election is important to anyone who has their mind on the far right drift of the Supreme Court.

But then matters began to slide and this columnist has said on a number of recent occasions that if Obama wants to ensure his election, he needs to look again at Hillary. (I said this last Tuesday on CNN’s "American Morning" with John Roberts. Click here to watch the clip.) I also remarked on the unpleasant reality — to many — of Sen. Clinton’s famous husband’s omnipresence. But I believe it won’t be a factor. I think she would force him to butt out! Her loss in the primary taught her a great lesson and I know this for a fact.

——————————

Nobody paid a bit of attention to my chiding Obama to take Hillary as a precaution, if not as the best of a lot of dreary choices. Then Wednesday night, following Ralph Nader’s astonishing prediction that just what we’ve said here should happen, would  happen —  all the talking heads on TV began a drumbeat — it should be, it will be Hillary, Hillary, Hillary!  And as Obama’s polls shortened the distance between him and John McCain, people said this more and more.

So you won’t be surprised to learn that one of the most famous superstars the ’60s, ’70s, ’80s, ’90s — now on her eternal comeback career — telephoned us entirely on her own initiative to have her say.

If you don’t care about celebs endorsing politicians, then so be it. If you are curious — read on.

——————————

My phone rings midday Wednesday. A slightly hoarse, husky woman’s voice says, "Liz? Do you know who this is?" The voice is familiar, but I can’t be sure. Am I in an old American Express commercial? I hate guessing games. "No, who is this?" I reply with more acerbity than intended. "Oh, I love when people don’t know. Liz, it’s Cher!" Indeed it is Cher, fighting a strained throat, courtesy of her ongoing Las Vegas gig.

Cher says, "I have something I want to tell you." Visions of wedding invitations or a Korean baby adoption dance through my head. "Yes?" Cher gives with the big reveal, with no preamble: "If Barack Obama does not pick Hillary Clinton as his running mate, he is going to lose this election." I start to respond, but Cher is on a roll "I think millions won’t vote. And not just the ‘uneducated, blue-collar women,’ as the media condescendingly refers to Hillary supporters."

Cher, it seems, has decided to take no prisoners on this one. She is certainty itself. "He can’t win without her. No other running mate can help him. He needs her. She is formidable in ways he is not — at least not yet." I venture then the caution that Republicans have a standing "Get Hillary" campaign ready to go. Cher snorts: "There is nothing more to be said about her. She and Bill Clinton have been the victim of every ghastly accusation. They have
survived."

Of Obama, Cher says: "I like him. He is a good person. Intelligent and thoughtful. But he comes off as too thoughtful. We don’t need a verbose and contemplative president. We need  a roll-up-your-sleeves-get-down-there kind of person. Hillary was and is that kind of person. She was the best choice to be president. But that’s not gonna’ happen right now. So the next best thing is she’s gotta’ be there to help him. You can’t win an election on a bumper sticker about ‘change.’ Every politician
promises change! What’s new?"

189 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

sibelle daubigne
If you agree, it’s all good!
By sibelle daubigne on 08/22/2008 6:42 pm
Sharon Belko
De - I always enjoy reading your posts but the above one takes the cake!! You hit the nail on the proverbial head - wish everyone in the country could/would read it and ponder their scary futures if McCain (God forbid) wins!!!
By Sharon Belko on 08/22/2008 9:20 pm
~ countrywoman ~
Excellent reference, as usual, DeBúrca.
Thanks!
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 08/22/2008 11:28 pm
DeBúrca obj
You’re welcome!
By DeBúrca obj on 08/23/2008 7:59 am
Mr. Wow
No where in Liz Smith’s talk with Cher, does Liz interject—“isn’t this brilliant political theory?!” Indeed Liz warned us—if you don’t like celebrity endorsement of politicians, stop reading now. Liz brought up the correct questions—will you vote for McCain…isn’t Obama the better choice no matter his “flaws”…was it REALLY sexism that did Hillary in? And she let Cher talk. I’m old enough to remember how long Liz Smith has been writing and how far back her firendship with Cher goes and how typical this IS of Cher—this sudden spouting off. Relax, everybody! It’ll be be Biden, and Hillary will do her duties. He won’t win, but I doubt he could even with Hillary. We’ll all have to be brave and suck it up when McCain gets in, and hope that nothing happens to him and we end up with Morman cult leader Mitt Romney as President.
By Mr. Wow on 08/22/2008 7:52 pm
Maizie James
Denis, Really!!! “We’ll all have to be brave and suck it up when McCain gets in, and hope that nothing happens to him and we end up with Morman cult leader Mitt Romney as President.” Oh! Now, that really sends shivers up my back!
By Maizie James on 08/22/2008 9:06 pm
Buh- Bye
This whole “suck it up” and “get over it thing” reminds me of when Bush stole the election from Gore. The GOP kept telling us to get over it. No self-respecting, flag waving American gets over corrupt elections where certain states have suspect voting or are eliminated altogether from the decision. It’s an Obamanation.
By Buh- Bye on 08/23/2008 12:15 am
Marjorie C.
My Alias: “It’s an Obamanation.” Ain’t it though. And the good people here on WoW think it’s all about the Clintons when it’s truly all about a corrupt primary process. My hat is off to the 3,000,000 voters who are having trouble falling in line behind the Dems who care so little for them. The ugly photos of Hillary still burn in my mind.
By Marjorie C. on 08/23/2008 9:23 am
Linda Mason
Marjorie and My Alias: you both continue to mention a “Corrupt” and “rigged” primary process (although there is a real question if Marjorie even participated in it). If either of you has any bona fide evidence of any rigging, or corruption, please assure us that you have taken that evidence to the federal election authorities.
By Linda Mason on 08/23/2008 10:28 am
Marjorie C.
Linda, I voted in the primaries — it was not a caucus. It was Super Tuesday and I cast my ballot for Hillary. As for the caucuses, there is someone who has gathered evidence through interviews, etc. Don’t know how far they’ll go — probably write a book about it. Might be too little, too late. There are coalitions upon coalitions of voters who are trying to pull Obama off the ballot. Some are questioning his citizenship. Obama is a favorite on this site, but not everywhere.
By Marjorie C. on 08/23/2008 11:58 am
K O
When anyone says “get over it” to me, I think, “Oh, okay. Since YOU say I should not feel the way I do, I’ll stop - immediately.” What delusions of power must exist in the minds of people who think that they can order someone to how to feel Machiavelli would never have had to resort to cruelty or treachury had he been surrounded with such pliable minds. The piece de resistance is generally in the form of a banner of wanting “unity.” The day I unify with people who tell me “Get over it” is the day I embrace mind control.
By K O on 08/23/2008 9:57 am
Linda Mason
Denis — I’m calling you out on this one. If you don’t want to end up with McCain as Pres., and the possibility of Romney as Pres., then why don’t you work to elect Obama??? Don’t wimp out—don’t sit here and complain and talk about how we’ll have to “suck it up!” If such a travesty happens, I will have the right to complain and castigate those who let it happen, because I am working to elect Obama! What side will you be on? Please advise. And God bless!
By Linda Mason on 08/22/2008 9:15 pm
Mr. Wow
The right side—Obama. I’ll vote for him. I don’t think he’ll win. And I don’t really think Hillary could have won, either. America is still not ready for a man of color or a woman. But I wouldn’t just give up and vote for McCain or “sit it out.” If you do that, you really have NO right to complain. And I have a feeling I’ll have plenty to complain about the next four to eight years.
By Mr. Wow on 08/22/2008 9:43 pm
Linda Mason
Denis —Guess I misunderstood where you were coming from. I just go a little bonkers at the notion of a McCain presidency, and I hate to see the threat of a Romney presidency resurrected. I really want to get people involved. Maybe we will run into each other during the campaign!
By Linda Mason on 08/23/2008 10:34 am